Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark II!
#34351
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 05:54
#34352
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 05:55
I also told you what they changedAndromidius wrote...
So the EC changed some of the dream sequences?
Can't find anything on youtube yet...
It's probably not on YT because no one noticed it.
#34353
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 05:57
I smell denial.
#34354
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 05:58
Shepard is lying on his back, albeit on an inclined plane, which, come to think of it, is a position that would be very hard to get to unless someone had dragged/lifted him up there. It may just be for dramatic purposes, but then again, it might not.
#34355
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 05:58
#34356
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 05:59
MegumiAzusa wrote...
I also told you what they changedAndromidius wrote...
So the EC changed some of the dream sequences?
Can't find anything on youtube yet...
It's probably not on YT because no one noticed it.
Yeah, I'm just curious what it looks like. I installed the EC just before doing Cronos, so I guess I missed it.
#34357
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:04
Might do a before/after video later, haven't installed the EC on my other PC yet.Andromidius wrote...
MegumiAzusa wrote...
I also told you what they changedAndromidius wrote...
So the EC changed some of the dream sequences?
Can't find anything on youtube yet...
It's probably not on YT because no one noticed it.
Yeah, I'm just curious what it looks like. I installed the EC just before doing Cronos, so I guess I missed it.
#34358
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:07
masster blaster wrote...
Guys it's like I said in the last page the only reason there is even a breath scene it's because the war assets are holding the reapers off and Harbinger off so Shepard can wake up. Did any of us ever thought the reason why the catalyst ever leaves early because it's going to go kill Shepard before Shepard wakes up.
Also when you stop and think for a sec. In the new EC Shepard can refuse the Indcotrination bd the catalyst goes into a reaper voices that has both Shepard's voice the childs voices and Harbingers voices appifled so that some people may think it's just a reaper.
And it also makes sense with the breath scene after the epilogue because Shepard is starting to feel that he/she is alive, and that all because of the war assets we have collected because it's bying time for Shepard to wake up.and could explain why it took so much in the original content ending in which Shepard can wake up after you unlock Synthesis, which is funny because you would think that it would be the best ending if it would be unlocked after you unlock the breath scene.
And finaly we get to the part were the god child lies to Shepard about EDI and the geth dying because if Shepard did survive the destroy ending you bet your a.. that they also did to because If the endings are Inoctrination attemptes then every thing we see is wrong.
Mmmh, but if you choose "Destroy" ending, you'll see EDI's name on the memorial...
#34359
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:12
#34360
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:17
#34361
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:19
I've a question instead: if Hackett says that we will rebuild everything has been destroyed (or damaged, like the Mass Relays) why they can't "repair" EDI?
Last question: if EDI's dead, the Normandy should work no longer, or I'm wrong?
masster blaster wrote...
Also otreblA Shepard already knew
that they were EDI and the geth were going to die including Shepard
himself/herself, and Shepard already knew that Anderson was dead. So if
IT is true then after the Normandy leaves in Destroy Shepard wakes up
after they show the breath scene and from there we pick up were we left
off.
Yeah but if the IT is true...Why then Bioware didn't confirm this theory with the EC DLC?
Modifié par otreblA_SNAKE_ITA, 29 juin 2012 - 06:20 .
#34362
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:21
the normandy would work just fine, it would be as the first normandy.otreblA_SNAKE_ITA wrote...
Yeah but EDI was on the Normandy and our teammates watched her dying!
I've a question instead: if Hackett says that we will rebuild everything has been destroyed (or damaged, like the Mass Relays) why they can't "repair" EDI?
Last question: if EDI's dead, the Normandy should work no longer, or I'm wrong?masster blaster wrote...
Also otreblA Shepard already knew
that they were EDI and the geth were going to die including Shepard
himself/herself, and Shepard already knew that Anderson was dead. So if
IT is true then after the Normandy leaves in Destroy Shepard wakes up
after they show the breath scene and from there we pick up were we left
off.
Yeah but if the IT is true...Why then Bioware didn't confirm this theory with the EC DLC?
#34363
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:21
Victus- "You never asked to be a leader (Shepard), but if you refuse all of your people will die."
Might lend some credence as to why Shepard would see or think his people lose the war and die after choosing refusal. Just a thought.
#34364
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:24
delldo wrote...
Probably already discussed, but I think I found some foreshadowing with the refuse ending...
Victus- "You never asked to be a leader (Shepard), but if you refuse all of your people will die."
Might lend some credence as to why Shepard would see or think his people lose the war and die after choosing refusal. Just a thought.
That's a fair point.
However, Refuse can still be good as an 'out' to escape Indoctrination if you only have the option to Control. Though it should definately not be as good as Destroy.
#34365
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:26
Also why didn't Hackett ever mention Shepard at all in the Destroy Epilogue when in synthesis and Control did.
#34366
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:27
delldo wrote...
Probably already discussed, but I think I found some foreshadowing with the refuse ending...
Victus- "You never asked to be a leader (Shepard), but if you refuse all of your people will die."
Might lend some credence as to why Shepard would see or think his people lose the war and die after choosing refusal. Just a thought.
T.E.N.U.O.U.S
#34367
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:30
SubAstris wrote...
delldo wrote...
Probably already discussed, but I think I found some foreshadowing with the refuse ending...
Victus- "You never asked to be a leader (Shepard), but if you refuse all of your people will die."
Might lend some credence as to why Shepard would see or think his people lose the war and die after choosing refusal. Just a thought.
T.E.N.U.O.U.S
It can be taken either way. Either its just a heroic statement, and a way to show personality growth between the characters, or its foreshadowing.
Regardless, it fits well with the theme. At face value, Refuse is the worst option - everyone dies.
#34368
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:30
#34369
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:31
Andromidius wrote...
delldo wrote...
Probably already discussed, but I think I found some foreshadowing with the refuse ending...
Victus- "You never asked to be a leader (Shepard), but if you refuse all of your people will die."
Might lend some credence as to why Shepard would see or think his people lose the war and die after choosing refusal. Just a thought.
That's a fair point.
However, Refuse can still be good as an 'out' to escape Indoctrination if you only have the option to Control. Though it should definately not be as good as Destroy.
I like refusal myself, I do not see it as Shepard giving up, in fact I think it is the best ending if he were to fight off indoctrination. Having the idea planted in his head by those words and all of the foreshadowing of not being able to win convintionaly gives him the vision of the possible loss of the war. Is refusal an option no matter how high your EMS is?
#34370
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:31
#34371
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:31
masster blaster wrote...
Well eid is apart of the ship but no joker can still fly the Normandy so ya I think they can, but Hackett never tells the Normandy crew about Anderson is dead or Shepard. So they only think that Shepard my be dead but if this is all in Shepard's head then Shepard believes that he/she may be alive and if Shepard was suppost to die in Destroy then what's to say that if Shepard survived then so could have the geth and EDI.
Also why didn't Hackett ever mention Shepard at all in the Destroy Epilogue when in synthesis and Control did.
Under IT, whether EDI and the geth died in destroy doesn't really matter, since, you know, it's all in Shepard's head.
#34372
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:32
#34373
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:33
#34374
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:34
Allen Spellwaver wrote...
So I guess an IT DLC is within fetch.
In that case I would be extatic to witness the poostorm on BSN
IT can exist besides the literal ending, but the literal ending would be screwed by any objective proof of IT.
#34375
Posté 29 juin 2012 - 06:36
Andromidius wrote...
SubAstris wrote...
delldo wrote...
Probably already discussed, but I think I found some foreshadowing with the refuse ending...
Victus- "You never asked to be a leader (Shepard), but if you refuse all of your people will die."
Might lend some credence as to why Shepard would see or think his people lose the war and die after choosing refusal. Just a thought.
T.E.N.U.O.U.S
It can be taken either way. Either its just a heroic statement, and a way to show personality growth between the characters, or its foreshadowing.
Regardless, it fits well with the theme. At face value, Refuse is the worst option - everyone dies.
Not necessarily. Many times in the ME series it has been referenced that one should not sacrifice their morals, even if that means dying (there is actually quite a good cutscene with EDI where they talk about such a matter). Only the refuse option means you don't deal with the Reapers and the Catalyst, and destroy could easily be seen as capitulation to the will of a Stalinist dictator in the form of the Catalyst




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





