GethPrimeMKII wrote...
Id like a literalist's take on this question: Why does the catalyst, a several billion year old AI, come in the form of a child seen only by Shepard?
If the events inside the citadel were real, there would be absolutely no reason for the AI to appear as that child. The AI could have appeared in any form and still convinced Shepard it was an AI. After all, whose to say what this AI looks like?
The fact that this AI, who claims to be the collective intelligence of the reapers, appears as a boy Shepard saw, should raise a lot of suspicion. It's proof that the reapers are in Shepard's head, screwing with her thoughts.
To me, assuming a literalist's take on the EC footage, it's no problem that the Catalyst is in Shepard's head, since technically, he's a Reaper, if you pick the Refuse ending, it even sounds like one. So to me, indoctrination is very present, if you trust the Catalyst (=literalist to me). So, the AI must be in Shepard's head. I think he chose the form of an innocent child, thus making it easier for Shepard to trust him and to speed up the process of getting Shepard to make a decision. Again, this is where I trust the Catalyst and assume that his only goal is, indeed, to make peace between organics and synthetics.
No matter how I twist this, to me the EC made it very clear that the Catalyst is a Reaper, hence indoctrination is present in any case. And by that it is in Shep's head, anyways.