Sareth Cousland wrote...
Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...
Refusal is a definite choice. Shepard chooses to fight the Reapers without comprimising with the Catalyst. All of the other choices are compromises. Refusal isn't.
I understand where you're coming from. I agree that refusal is a little slippery IT-wise. Still, as much of the EC was added to please literalists, I'd say that the refusal ending itself is such a nod to that part of the fan community. For IT adherents, destroy always was a logical choice. So maybe we shouldn't try to press refusal too much into IT when it was not planned at first. The whole extensive dialogue with the kid makes far less sense than the barely-able Shepard of the original ending under IT circumstances as well - one of the reasons why I prefer the original version.
This is my stance as well.
Though I expand a bit more, like this;
I'm currently in the camp that says "Destroy is Shepard sticking to his guns and choosing to slog on with what was his original motive from the beginning, since he has the stones to keep fighting, even if he has to sacrifice some things."
Rejection, well that's Shepard trying to play Captain Kirk, choosing not to stick to what he has been going for since the beginning since something unappealing was tacked on, but not completely breaking and going over to Control and remaining canny enough not to be tricked by Synthesis, basically demanding a third option, only to discover there isn't one.
In "Reject" Shepard is canny and wise enough not to fall for indoctrination, but not determined enough to break free, and so Harbinger kills him.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





