Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark II!


55528 réponses à ce sujet

#38301
TSA_383

TSA_383
  • Members
  • 2 013 messages

WandySilva wrote...

hey everyone,
I apologize if this has already been discussed, but before the extended cut, there was an overturned mako(or kodiak) in the breath scene, is it still there post ec?

It's completely unchanged.


Schachmatt wrote...

EpyonX3 wrote...

Schachmatt wrote...

The argument wasn't about someone senses indoctrination on Shepard. It was about if someone senses if there is something different about Shepard. And there certainly is.


What's different about Shepard?

Ask Joker. Or Anderson [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wink.png[/smilie]
They
are the ones noticing it - and this is what the whole argument is
about. So we are talking about established lore in this case.


...Or Liara, or Ashley, or Garrus, or Javik....

#38302
smokingotter1

smokingotter1
  • Members
  • 735 messages
I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?

#38303
Rosewind

Rosewind
  • Members
  • 1 801 messages

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Booze solves all problems, or shooting somthing.

#38304
FellishBeast

FellishBeast
  • Members
  • 1 689 messages
Any recent developments?

#38305
lex0r11

lex0r11
  • Members
  • 2 190 messages

Rosewind wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Booze solves all problems, or shooting somthing.



Posted Image

#38306
L0NEWOLF25

L0NEWOLF25
  • Members
  • 177 messages
I'm back, so what have I missed.

#38307
Headbutters inc

Headbutters inc
  • Members
  • 25 messages

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Maybe Leviahan DLC will give an option to break free of indoctrination to which the efuse ending could be built upon?!?

This Leviathan thing can just kick you out of your own head?

#38308
BansheeOwnage

BansheeOwnage
  • Members
  • 11 290 messages

Headbutters inc wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Maybe Leviahan DLC will give an option to break free of indoctrination to which the efuse ending could be built upon?!?

This Leviathan thing can just kick you out of your own head?



Leviathan seems to point to an anti-indoctrination process actually. The people mentioned in it don't all die. They "wake up" after losing 10 years of their life. No longer indoctrinated.

#38309
Turbo_J

Turbo_J
  • Members
  • 1 217 messages

Headbutters inc wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Maybe Leviahan DLC will give an option to break free of indoctrination to which the efuse ending could be built upon?!?

This Leviathan thing can just kick you out of your own head?


2175 AEIA :whistle:

Even looks like the dream planet - maybe a little subconscious clue.

Modifié par Turbo_J, 03 juillet 2012 - 06:45 .


#38310
Rosewind

Rosewind
  • Members
  • 1 801 messages

lex0r11 wrote...

Rosewind wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Booze solves all problems, or shooting somthing.



Posted Image


LEX0R!!!!! *pounce*

#38311
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages
Tequila Se'lai! is the funniest motivational so far. Posted Image

Modifié par paxxton, 03 juillet 2012 - 06:48 .


#38312
llbountyhunter

llbountyhunter
  • Members
  • 1 646 messages

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Grayson was able to resist the effect of indoctrination indefinitely,  until he was dosed with red sand. And he was directly injected with reaper nanites too.

Shayla was completely indoctrinated,  and was still able to break free, yeah it was thanks to the thorian, but it shows that it is possible.

#38313
Headbutters inc

Headbutters inc
  • Members
  • 25 messages

Turbo_J wrote...

Headbutters inc wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Maybe Leviahan DLC will give an option to break free of indoctrination to which the efuse ending could be built upon?!?

This Leviathan thing can just kick you out of your own head?


2175 AEIA :whistle:

Even looks like the dream planet - maybe a little subconscious clue.


Yup. It's the only planet with the same look as the jungle planet in the end. Why would Hackett have that as a rendezvous point? Also why are no other ships there from the Alliance since they all seem to head out at the same time?

'Asides from the Normandy being the fastest ship in the galaxy'

Modifié par Headbutters inc, 03 juillet 2012 - 07:01 .


#38314
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

masster blaster wrote...

Paxxton yor a genues.

*snip*

Well, thanks, I guess. Posted Image

EpyonX3 wrote...

*snip*

Synergics (Thanks Paxxton!)

*snip*

You're welcome.

@all: Synergic is the name for life after Synthesis (like organic or synthetic).

Modifié par paxxton, 03 juillet 2012 - 07:52 .


#38315
MegumiAzusa

MegumiAzusa
  • Members
  • 4 238 messages

MaximizedAction wrote...

Simon_Says wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

twitter.com/JessicaMerizan/status/220013144565751808
"it's assumed that the Catalyst is appearing as something familiar to Shepard because it's an AI and likely has no form."

If the Catalyst hasn't been inside of Shepard's head, then at least some Reaper must've observed them interacting at some point.

Besides, out of all the things familiar to Shepard it could've appeared as, it's this damn kid.

You mean the reapers saw that one interaction between Shepard and Ventboy, despite the fact that they were both indoors and one was in a vent? And they managed to see this, but not gift them a thanix beam? Riiight.


No, I agree! No matter how you twist or turn this, it always comes down to the AI/Reapers being in Shepard's head, no matter if you're literalist or ITist.

The more interesting thing is that when entering the Geth consensus:
Legion: We have installed filters to allow you to make visual sense of this server's raw data. Your mind perceives our world as something familiar.

Geth needed a new software to work as a filter, the Reapers seem content without/already use something like that. This confirms at any point of the game you can't know if something is real.
If it's a projection in her mind why is it not displayed as a Reaper.

On another note:
When asking about Synthesis:
"It is the ideal solution. Now that we know it is possible, it is inevitable we will reach synthesis."
It seems it actually doesn't care what you choose, this statement completely contradicts the other choices.

#38316
BansheeOwnage

BansheeOwnage
  • Members
  • 11 290 messages

MegumiAzusa wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

Simon_Says wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

twitter.com/JessicaMerizan/status/220013144565751808
"it's assumed that the Catalyst is appearing as something familiar to Shepard because it's an AI and likely has no form."

If the Catalyst hasn't been inside of Shepard's head, then at least some Reaper must've observed them interacting at some point.

Besides, out of all the things familiar to Shepard it could've appeared as, it's this damn kid.

You mean the reapers saw that one interaction between Shepard and Ventboy, despite the fact that they were both indoors and one was in a vent? And they managed to see this, but not gift them a thanix beam? Riiight.


No, I agree! No matter how you twist or turn this, it always comes down to the AI/Reapers being in Shepard's head, no matter if you're literalist or ITist.

The more interesting thing is that when entering the Geth consensus:
Legion: We have installed filters to allow you to make visual sense of this server's raw data. Your mind perceives our world as something familiar.

Geth needed a new software to work as a filter, the Reapers seem content without/already use something like that. This confirms at any point of the game you can't know if something is real.
If it's a projection in her mind why is it not displayed as a Reaper.

On another note:
When asking about Synthesis:
"It is the ideal solution. Now that we know it is possible, it is inevitable we will reach synthesis."
It seems it actually doesn't care what you choose, this statement completely contradicts the other choices.

We'll add it to the list of things it says that condradict (someone should actually make one).

#38317
Rosewind

Rosewind
  • Members
  • 1 801 messages

MegumiAzusa wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

Simon_Says wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

twitter.com/JessicaMerizan/status/220013144565751808
"it's assumed that the Catalyst is appearing as something familiar to Shepard because it's an AI and likely has no form."

If the Catalyst hasn't been inside of Shepard's head, then at least some Reaper must've observed them interacting at some point.

Besides, out of all the things familiar to Shepard it could've appeared as, it's this damn kid.

You mean the reapers saw that one interaction between Shepard and Ventboy, despite the fact that they were both indoors and one was in a vent? And they managed to see this, but not gift them a thanix beam? Riiight.


No, I agree! No matter how you twist or turn this, it always comes down to the AI/Reapers being in Shepard's head, no matter if you're literalist or ITist.

The more interesting thing is that when entering the Geth consensus:
Legion: We have installed filters to allow you to make visual sense of this server's raw data. Your mind perceives our world as something familiar.

Geth needed a new software to work as a filter, the Reapers seem content without/already use something like that. This confirms at any point of the game you can't know if something is real.
If it's a projection in her mind why is it not displayed as a Reaper.

On another note:
When asking about Synthesis:
"It is the ideal solution. Now that we know it is possible, it is inevitable we will reach synthesis."
It seems it actually doesn't care what you choose, this statement completely contradicts the other choices.


Yeah but everything Starbinger says contradicts all the time.

#38318
Simon_Says

Simon_Says
  • Members
  • 1 164 messages

niravital wrote...

What about the new memorial scene at the end of EC DLC?

In both control and synthesis, Shepard's LI puts his name on the wall, but in the destroy ending, LI holds on to it and looks up as refusing to believe Shepard is dead.

If the IT isn't true, it doesn't make sense. How do they know at this point that Shepard is dead? in these two options, the Reapers stop their attack, there is no further destruction. In destroy option, stuff blows up (at least Reaper creatures do). The Normandy acts the same in all of the three options, why in only one of them does the LI seem to believe Shepard is alive, and in the other two they think he's dead?

Or it could just be a reflection of EMS. With enough preparation it becomes plausible to the LI and Normandy crew that Shepard survived another Suicide Mission. In lower EMS there are likely too many losses sustained in the battle to think that Shepard wasn't one of the casualties. As for synthesis and control, it's probably just that the reapers communicated what happened.

I'd actually start questioning why Shepard has 'visions' in low/mid EMS destroy. If Shepard broke through the indoctrination, why is the mid-range EMS destroy epilogue mournful yet ultimately hopeful? We thought pre-EC that the epilogue cutscenes in destroy were a final message to spite Shepard. EC debunked that much I think.

My own take is that all of the epilogues do not occur in-universe. Like the crawling text that opens each game, like Shep standing triumphantly before a blue/red background in the last shot of ME1, the ME3 epilogues are meant as narration to serve the player of how things stand in the ME universe. Remember, if Bioware intended/intends IT as canon, the point was to indoctrinate the player as well as Shepard.

And there are plenty of other instances in the series where the perspective of the plot shifted away from Shepard's own. Saren's freakout on Sovereign, Miranda talking with TIM at the start of ME2, even playing as Joker when the collectors abduct Normandy's crew. If we see something in the games it's not neccesarily true that Shepard saw it as well.

Then again...

niravital wrote...

TSA_383 wrote...
You're missing the point somewhat.

The point is that whatever you choose, Shepard believes his work is done and that he's saved the galaxy, and you get essentially a dream sequence showing what you'd see as the future of your chosen scenario... and then you die, or become a reaper slave, or something similar...

Yes, and it is even implied (at least) that "seeing the future" can happen inside indoctrinated people's minds: If you kill TIM by gunshot at the end, he says "Earth... I wish you could see it like I do, Shepard... It is perfect". Hmmm... and then we imagine that perfect future ourselves if we choose control, right before turning reaper-zombie (which also possible, it appears under the Indoc entry in the codex)

Nice catch. Saren also kept banging on about his glorious vision of the future in ME1.

Modifié par Simon_Says, 03 juillet 2012 - 07:30 .


#38319
smokingotter1

smokingotter1
  • Members
  • 735 messages

BansheeOwnage wrote...

Headbutters inc wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

I have a concern regarding Indoctrination Theory that just popped in my mind. From playing ME1-3 I got the impression that indoctrination was not something you could choose your way out of and was something you could snap out of... but only for a brief moment and those moments typically involve dying/suicide. From what I read it looks like the effects of indoctrination are both cumulative and permanent.

So even with a IT DLC Shepard will never be the same, even if the reapers are all destroyed. Unless they come up with some kind of anti indoctrination device that can undo the damage done to the brain. Alcohol maybe?


Maybe Leviahan DLC will give an option to break free of indoctrination to which the efuse ending could be built upon?!?

This Leviathan thing can just kick you out of your own head?



Leviathan seems to point to an anti-indoctrination process actually. The people mentioned in it don't all die. They "wake up" after losing 10 years of their life. No longer indoctrinated.


Post reaper war that's going to be #1 excuse for all bad things.

"Timmy, turn in your homework." "Uh, my dog ate- I mean I didn't do it because I was indoctrinated."

Bill Lumbergh: "Did you get the latest TPS report?"
Peter: "Sorry, I was indoctrinated last week."

Reapers: "So how's the work going on indoctrinating Shepard?"
Harbinger: "Uh... I didn't get that done because I was indoctrinated..."
Reapers: :huh:

#38320
Simon_Says

Simon_Says
  • Members
  • 1 164 messages

MegumiAzusa wrote...

On another note:
When asking about Synthesis:
"It is the ideal solution. Now that we know it is possible, it is inevitable we will reach synthesis."
It seems it actually doesn't care what you choose, this statement completely contradicts the other choices.

The reapers thought a lot of things were inevitable, yet Harbinger kept questioning why we resisted. Sure they may think such and such is inevitable, even though they were proven wrong time and again. Doesn't mean they don't prefer the path of least resistance.

#38321
Simon_Says

Simon_Says
  • Members
  • 1 164 messages

smokingotter1 wrote...

Reapers: "So how's the work going on indoctrinating Shepard?"
Harbinger: "Uh... I didn't get that done because I was indoctrinated..."
Reapers: :huh:

Actually, think about it. Indoctrination is about turning organic minds to align with those of the reapers, right? So basically, it causes the subjects to think like reapers. A reaper mind and a thoroughly indoctrinated one would be very, very similar, no?

And if the reapers are made by converting several million minds, probably based on organisms who didn't wish to be converted, then they have to figure a way to force all those minds to work together under the reaper's banner. In short, they have to be indoctrinated.

Basically, the reapers are indoctrinated. And like a virus epidemic, they parastically spread that indoctrination to reproduce. In a way, you could say then that the reapers are not the actual enemy. They're just another instrument of the real enemy. And that enemy is Indoctrination itself.

Can probably even link this idea with my Cosmic Imperative hypothesis. Indoctrination would be the galactic superorganism: the thinking system that sustains itself by harvesting lesser life.

Modifié par Simon_Says, 03 juillet 2012 - 07:51 .


#38322
Rosewind

Rosewind
  • Members
  • 1 801 messages

Simon_Says wrote...

MegumiAzusa wrote...

On another note:
When asking about Synthesis:
"It is the ideal solution. Now that we know it is possible, it is inevitable we will reach synthesis."
It seems it actually doesn't care what you choose, this statement completely contradicts the other choices.

The reapers thought a lot of things were inevitable, yet Harbinger kept questioning why we resisted. Sure they may think such and such is inevitable, even though they were proven wrong time and again. Doesn't mean they don't prefer the path of least resistance.


This probably why they indoctrinate because it has less resistance then brute force. It is easy to take down a place from with in then it is to throw rocks at it's walls.

#38323
lex0r11

lex0r11
  • Members
  • 2 190 messages

Rosewind wrote...

[...]

LEX0R!!!!! *pounce*



*pounces too, meeting Rose mid-air*

:D

#38324
Rosewind

Rosewind
  • Members
  • 1 801 messages

lex0r11 wrote...

Rosewind wrote...

[...]

LEX0R!!!!! *pounce*



*pounces too, meeting Rose mid-air*

:D


Ow my nose lol, I missed you :D I went dead when I plucked the guts up to see what the EC add, which was nothing but more confusion lol

#38325
Xavendithas

Xavendithas
  • Members
  • 268 messages
Anything fun being discussed today??