Darth_Trethon wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
"our"???
You best believe it's our game.....it's how they always advertised it and should the EC flop the initial outrage will seem like a minor issue in comparison....that's when things get even more serious....Mass Returns and their fan base essentially gone.
I disagree. Clearly it's Bioware's game- we just enjoy the fruits of their labor.
UrgedDuke wrote...
does anyone else find the lack of info Bioware has given us disturbing, and what I mean by that is the cryptic answers they give us when asked about IT. Also the lack of confirmation/disapproval of IT
This feels to me like something Bioware HAS to do in order for IT to work. If they confirmed it OR denied it, the EC would be severly crippled. Enjoy it, folks- it's a genuine mystery.
legaldinho wrote...
just replayed tuchanka, third time. This time with the music off, and wandering around changing the settings on my headphones to hear the sounds, especially as I approach the starchild. No way anyone can convince me this isn't supposed to indicate the process of indoctrination is under way... and the child is a sinister character as the sounds escalate as you get closer, with the- super clear- harbinger filter being used for the low murmurs.
Sorry, can you clarify what you mean- do you encounter the child in Tuchanka, or are you referring to the linked dream sequence?
liggy002 wrote...
Hey all, take a look at the image posted in this thread by Bill Casey. New IT implications:
http://social.biowar...5495/4#12175467
Bioware is indeed hinting at it.
Where does this image take place? At the start of the game? Do we have the sequence on youtube for further analysis?
JasonSic wrote...
My friend found something. In the Voice Cast Reveal trailer, at 3:36, Martin Sheen says:
"Stay tuned, heh... I'm not done yet, LOL!"
I'm guessing this video was made after all the Voice Work was recorded. He's gotta be hinting towards something, since the Illusive Man is 'dead'.
Video
I noticed this also- I think it's a definite clue. We'll know for sure once he comes back for VO work (gasp! Unless they did it already to be sneaky!)- keep your scanners peeled.
dmay7 wrote...
If the Indoctrinated theory is true, then my opinion on the ending completely changes. After I head the theory, I immediately played all the endings. During control and synthesis, Shepard 'dissolves', but look at his eyes, they turn blue. My characters is brown. He gets the same eyes that TIM has. He's turning into a husk. Whereas in Destroy, he stops limping halfway through shooting the conduit, and the catylist fades out of existence. Not to mention that it is clearly London rubble that Shepard wakes up to. AND the fact that Andersons wound suddenly winds up on Shepard.
BTW, am I the only one who thought that TIM was like all half-husk in the end? I mean look at his skin.
Welcome to the wonderful world of IT. What's amazing is that literalists IN THIS VERY THREAD have complained that if IT was true, there would be more obvious clues. Really?!? More obvious than the breath scene, and the Normandy dream scene, and the tree reflections in the crucible room, and turning into a husk?!? By this stage I feel like we are being bombarded with clues, ALL of which point to IT! How can people still not believe?
Makrys wrote...
Not sure if this has been mentioned at all, but even if so, its worth throwin out there again for anyone who hasn't seen it. A couple tweets were discovered a while back that were pretty revealing... then were later deleted. Intriguing? Here they are:
First one - @masseffect @PatrickWeekes did you feel pressured to change the ending, Isn't it important to stick to your guns on some things?
@satootaku We never said we were changing it
We have ALWAYS had big plans for ME3. It isn't a response-It's been in the works
Second - @masseffect Whats with the ending? It was confusing and very dreamlike was it supposed to be like that?
Mass Effect Mass Effect ‏ @masseffect
@kaladur The ending was as we intended, so yes? 
I didn't post the link because it just goes to a discussion board where the quotes are simply posted. But I would like to give a shout out to Mr. Bill Casey who posted the link a few days ago on another thread which is where I found it. Always on top of your evidence, Mr. Casey.
So... what do you guys think of that? Seems pretty revealing to me. And Priestly's response was laughable. Just a pure cover up, nothing more.

This is a great find, and in my eyes totally validates the IT/EC was planned perspective. Q: Who are @satootaku and @kaladur?
I appreciate the lengths they have gone to to keep this covered up. It's certainly providing a lot of...
....SPECULATION FOR EVERYONE!
Modifié par Destructorlio, 22 mai 2012 - 06:24 .