HellishFiend wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
Andromidius wrote...
I'd be okay if they did an unconventional victory DLC. Victory isn't impossible, but fighting it like a normal war won't work. Its the same deal with past conflicts - namely Vietnam, where conventional US tactics didn't work against the guerilla tactics of the Vietcong, or the American War of Independance where Washington rarely commited to pitched battles because he simply couldn't stand toe to toe with the British armies. You've got to think out of the box and adapt if you want to beat a technologically superior opponant.
NO.
People always quote those wars while not realizing the "slight" difference between a war that's about a resistance force trying to make an occupying army go "screw it, this place isn't worth it" and a war where the goal of both sides is complete extinction of the other.
Want to know how Vietnam would've gone if it was a war about extinction like the Reaper/everyone else war? America would've dropped thermonuclear bombs on Vietnam and it would've been over instantly. Ditto for Soviet Russia and Afghanistan. You know where the Statue of Liberty came from? The French. It was a giant middle finger to the English, whom they were fighting at the same time. See, we were an annoying little insect and our goal was "make it not worth the effort to re-claim the colonies" which is rather different from "face the full brunt of ALL their military forces who will kill every man, woman, and child on this continent without a second thought." Because if it was, the phrase "New England" would take on a whole new meaning. And we'd have a picture of the queen on our money.
I'm with Rifneno on this one. Simple way of looking at it is a bunch of kids playing with toys (ME organics/english colonies) vs a bunch of adults with real guns (ME reapers/European powers of the 1700s).
I re-state;
While I agree with you about conventional victory, YOU are forgetting one thing.
The goal is NOT extinction, extinction is the byproduct of "preserving" the unwilling species. They want us alive until they kill us.
It's the difference between slow indoctrination and fast indoctrination, yes they could wipe us out quickly completely and easily, but if they did they would not get what they want, they would destroy the very thing they are looking to capture in doing so, just like how Fast Indoctrination works quickly by definition, but destroy's the useful aspect of the subject, their mind.
They need to bide their time, take things slowly and not just drop a bomb on us if they are to get what they want out of it. If Extermination was the goal, there are far easier ways to go about it than slaughter ships.