Ce sujet est fermé
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Why is she jet black?Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Hey Rose, I've been meaning to ask you: what's with your avatar?Rosewind wrote...
*snip*
What do you mean?
smokingotter1 wrote...
leonia42 wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
Hmm. Watching the conduit run with Shepard dodging beams on the run down, something occurs me....
Harbinger has reach, but Shepard has flexibility.
Made me giggle far more than it should have.
...which is why it's important to always establish a safeword. An example: "destroy"
Oh...Okay. She just looks a littleRosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Why is she jet black?Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Hey Rose, I've been meaning to ask you: what's with your avatar?Rosewind wrote...
*snip*
What do you mean?
Because it is a black and white picture taken from a screen in Shadow broker DLC, it is done on purpose to highlight the colour of her eyes and armour.
you know? Anyway 
b23h wrote...
One issue that I had noted from wandering the galaxy during the first Mass Effect is that it seemed that a lot of the planet destruction from earlier Reaper incursions seemed to be from orbital bombardment. Yet when ME3 rolls around we have a bunch of Reapers hanging around the surface of the planet for an extended period of time.
Modifié par Priss Blackburne, 10 juillet 2012 - 07:15 .
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Oh...Okay. She just looks a littleRosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Why is she jet black?Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Hey Rose, I've been meaning to ask you: what's with your avatar?Rosewind wrote...
*snip*
What do you mean?
Because it is a black and white picture taken from a screen in Shadow broker DLC, it is done on purpose to highlight the colour of her eyes and armour.
Lol.Rifneno wrote...
I found this on my hard drive the other day. I must've saved it from the old ME2 motivationals thread. It seems... apt.
Alien. That's the first thing I though when I saw it so it sticks in my mind unfortunately. Doesn't matter. It's a sweet picture.Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Oh...Okay. She just looks a littleRosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Why is she jet black?Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Hey Rose, I've been meaning to ask you: what's with your avatar?Rosewind wrote...
*snip*
What do you mean?
Because it is a black and white picture taken from a screen in Shadow broker DLC, it is done on purpose to highlight the colour of her eyes and armour.
Ummm okay.....
Well the orbital bombardment is the most obvious simply because its orbital bombardment. It stays after hundreds of thousands of years and he's surprised it's there? Plus it's stated multiple times in ME3 the reapers use orbital bombardment all the time!Priss Blackburne wrote...
b23h wrote...
One issue that I had noted from wandering the galaxy during the first Mass Effect is that it seemed that a lot of the planet destruction from earlier Reaper incursions seemed to be from orbital bombardment. Yet when ME3 rolls around we have a bunch of Reapers hanging around the surface of the planet for an extended period of time.
Well they are supposed to Harvest advanced species, not kill them. The bombardments afterwards would most likely be due to when they are erasing any traces of that species from planets.
edit : Even if it's not from aftwards it would be logical to assume they would bombard key startegic locations first then land on the surface to engage and harvest the remaining people.
LOL. First, I thought it was Jack.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Alien. That's the first thing I though when I saw it so it sticks in my mind unfortunately. Doesn't matter. It's a sweet picture.Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Oh...Okay. She just looks a littleRosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Why is she jet black?Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Hey Rose, I've been meaning to ask you: what's with your avatar?Rosewind wrote...
*snip*
What do you mean?
Because it is a black and white picture taken from a screen in Shadow broker DLC, it is done on purpose to highlight the colour of her eyes and armour.
Ummm okay.....
Actually, I never connected these orbital bombardments to the Reapers. I thought they were remains of wars between different organic/synthetic races in other cycles. As we learn in the series, there were several wars not involving the Reapers: the First Contact War, the Krogan Rebellion and the Rachni Wars are just a few examples from our cycle alone. Other Cycles would most likely had wars, too. Just think about the Protheans and what Javik tells you about their history - they were conquering(!) the galaxy, annihilating races who didn't want to join their empire. And they also had a conflict with a synthetic race, similar to the Geth/Quarian War.b23h wrote...
While I really enjoyed the Mass Effect series, I concur that there are a number of problems. One issue that I had noted from wandering the galaxy during the first Mass Effect is that it seemed that a lot of the planet destruction from earlier Reaper incursions seemed to be from orbital bombardment. Yet when ME3 rolls around we have a bunch of Reapers hanging around the surface of the planet for an extended period of time.
*snip*
Modifié par Riot86, 10 juillet 2012 - 07:25 .
paxxton wrote...
LOL. First, I thought it was Jack.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Alien. That's the first thing I though when I saw it so it sticks in my mind unfortunately. Doesn't matter. It's a sweet picture.Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Oh...Okay. She just looks a littleRosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Why is she jet black?Rosewind wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Hey Rose, I've been meaning to ask you: what's with your avatar?Rosewind wrote...
*snip*
What do you mean?
Because it is a black and white picture taken from a screen in Shadow broker DLC, it is done on purpose to highlight the colour of her eyes and armour.
Ummm okay.....
Priss Blackburne wrote...
b23h wrote...
http://masseffectind...n.blogspot.com/
Blog so far is still giving me the impression that people disliked the ending enought to dig through plot holes and inconsistencies and thereby created IT. There are issues there that I concur are problems; such as why the Catalyst seems to be the same boy who appears to be a theme throughout ME3.
However to repeat, for me IT has more negative consequences than the plot holes that it supposedly fixes.
Shrugging it off as plotholes and inconsistencies you have to consider the whole Mass Effect series and how the ending does not fit with the amount of background detail and little touches that Bioware puts into their games. Why would it only be the ending that had these problems. So many people have the automatic negative perception that, this is just Bioware dropping the ball. When everything leading up to that endings is pure gold ( in my mind at least).
The shear amount of so called plotholes at the ending is very much out of character for a Bioware game. Yet people will take it at face value and just say Bioware are horrible writers and dropped the ball at the end. It's the perception that Bioware would intentionaly throw out all the lore and previous games themes.
This is the kind of detail Bioware puts into their games
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Fridge/MassEffect
It's a perception that can't really be easly removed from someone as it's seems to be the thing to do nowadays to the see the negative in everyone. And unfortunatly chances are your not going to see IT as being anything but wrong since your allready biased in your own perception against it, and it's something you have to keep a very open mind to consider.
ughh rant and typing cramp
Modifié par masster blaster, 10 juillet 2012 - 07:28 .
masster blaster wrote...
So do any of you know where I can go to the Literalyst tread because I want to see what they are up too, and no I won't talk to them about IT. So they won"t come here and desecrate the IT tread.
Also the anti IT tread would be nice too.
Don't worry I still am an ITer 110%, but I am curios about why they actually hate, hate, hate IT.
Also see what info they have on IT about disproving IT.
b23h wrote...
How did you like inventory control in the first Mass Effect? It was good considering it was desgined with consoles in mind.
Why can't one see the entire character information at one place in Skyrim? hmm again for the console side and people with smaller tv's
Why is relevant information in ME3 multiplayer spread out in several different screens? repeating myself but again a design limitation for the console sides.
However given all this, if one says that these plot holes are pointing towards the intent of Bioware to imply IT, then I suggest that you are replacing plot holes and inconsistencies with one of the MOST HACKNEYED DRAMATIC PLOTs EVER! The dream sequence that doesn't really happen or does not happen as shown.
That's the thing. I don't believe there is a thread for that. They're disorganized, and have no info.masster blaster wrote...
So do any of you know where I can go to the Literalyst tread because I want to see what they are up too, and no I won't talk to them about IT. So they won"t come here and desecrate the IT tread.
Also the anti IT tread would be nice too.
Don't worry I still am an ITer 110%, but I am curios about why they actually hate, hate, hate IT.
Also see what info they have on IT about disproving IT.
Dwailing wrote...
masster blaster wrote...
So do any of you know where I can go to the Literalyst tread because I want to see what they are up too, and no I won't talk to them about IT. So they won"t come here and desecrate the IT tread.
Also the anti IT tread would be nice too.
Don't worry I still am an ITer 110%, but I am curios about why they actually hate, hate, hate IT.
Also see what info they have on IT about disproving IT.
Literalists? Having information disproving IT? Uh, where have you been these past few days/weeks/months? If they had any SERIOUS evidence against us, you can be DARN sure they'd be in here rubbing it in our faces.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
That's the thing. I don't believe there is a thread for that. They're disorganized, and have no info.masster blaster wrote...
So do any of you know where I can go to the Literalyst tread because I want to see what they are up too, and no I won't talk to them about IT. So they won"t come here and desecrate the IT tread.
Also the anti IT tread would be nice too.
Don't worry I still am an ITer 110%, but I am curios about why they actually hate, hate, hate IT.
Also see what info they have on IT about disproving IT.
Modifié par paxxton, 10 juillet 2012 - 07:38 .
BansheeOwnage wrote...
That's the thing. I don't believe there is a thread for that. They're disorganized, and have no info.masster blaster wrote...
So do any of you know where I can go to the Literalyst tread because I want to see what they are up too, and no I won't talk to them about IT. So they won"t come here and desecrate the IT tread.
Also the anti IT tread would be nice too.
Don't worry I still am an ITer 110%, but I am curios about why they actually hate, hate, hate IT.
Also see what info they have on IT about disproving IT.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
That's the thing. I don't believe there is a thread for that. They're disorganized, and have no info.masster blaster wrote...
So do any of you know where I can go to the Literalyst tread because I want to see what they are up too, and no I won't talk to them about IT. So they won"t come here and desecrate the IT tread.
Also the anti IT tread would be nice too.
Don't worry I still am an ITer 110%, but I am curios about why they actually hate, hate, hate IT.
Also see what info they have on IT about disproving IT.
paxxton wrote...
http://social.biowar.../index/12598039
Modifié par Dwailing, 10 juillet 2012 - 07:42 .
paxxton wrote...
@masster blaster: http://social.biowar.../index/12598039
Modifié par masster blaster, 10 juillet 2012 - 07:45 .
Modifié par Priss Blackburne, 10 juillet 2012 - 07:47 .
Actually they are reaper-related. The rachni wars were started by Sovereign. The krogan rebellions were indirectly caused by the reapers, as they were caused by the rachni wars. The geth/quarian war was not started by the reapers but it was perpetuated by them. The Zha'til were taken over by the reapers in Javik's cycle. It is likely that most battles between synthetics and organics were actually caused by the reapers. How ironic...Riot86 wrote...
Actually, I never connected these orbital bombardments to the Reapers. I thought they were remains of wars between different organic/synthetic races in other cycles. As we learn in the series, there were several wars not involving the Reapers: the First Contact War, the Krogan Rebellion and the Rachni Wars are just a few examples from our cycle alone. Other Cycles would most likely had wars, too. Just think about the Protheans and what Javik tells you about their history - they were conquering(!) the galaxy, annihilating races who didn't want to join their empire. And they also had a conflict with a synthetic race, similar to the Geth/Quarian War.b23h wrote...
While I really enjoyed the Mass Effect series, I concur that there are a number of problems. One issue that I had noted from wandering the galaxy during the first Mass Effect is that it seemed that a lot of the planet destruction from earlier Reaper incursions seemed to be from orbital bombardment. Yet when ME3 rolls around we have a bunch of Reapers hanging around the surface of the planet for an extended period of time.
*snip*
Sorry, but I really don't think this is a plot hole.
Retour en haut
