Simon_Says wrote...
Vaya wrote...
Since we're short on speculation, let me ask, why does the guardian speak with Shepard's voice?
It's been pointed out that two of the channels are the male and female Shepard voices echoing the Guardian's conversation. It definately indicates that things are "not as they appear", and they made it clearer with the EC.
To me it suggests that the whole encounter isn't actually a conversation at all, but rather Shepard rationalizing the whispers from the reapers.
TRUST US
OBEY US
Saren didn't come to the conclusion that the reapers would let some of his poeple live on if he worked with them because Sovereign told him so, but rather because he convinced himself that Sovereign told him that.
One of the better arguments for the literal endings is that a power that controls the reapers is forshadowed by the Prothean VI. But what if it's the other way around? Shepard finds the Guardian because Shepard expects one to be there.
And if there was a higher power, it's not neccesarily an AI... (check sig hint hint)
I have, though I didn't have anything to add. It reminded me of the idea that language is a virus and a novel called Snowcrash by Neal Stephenson. Hmmph, maybe I did have something to add.
Simon_Says wrote...
But y'know, I like this idea actually. Except I'm not entirely sure why then there'd be two false leads if the choice is sorta-kinda self-imposed. Why not just the one?
-edit- Top o' de page to ye!
Synthesis strikes me as a curveball. If youre losing the argument, change direction. It dosen't have to make sense, it just has to throw the other person off balance. Which is why Synthesis makes the least sense under a rational eye. (space magic)
adding: It's not that Shepard is having the argument in a vacuum, its just that the other side is a bunch of reaper horns, not clear human thoughts.
Modifié par Vaya, 12 juillet 2012 - 01:53 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





