Ce sujet est fermé
Unfortunately, Estebanus probably can't tell us anything until monday or tuesday :/masster blaster wrote...
byne has Estebanus made contact with you or anyone else about SDCC, or his he waiting to report everything on Saturday?
That makes sense though. Besides, we all know about the IT interpretation.paxxton wrote...
Is it just me or since the EC was released we've been discussing the literal sense of the ending more often than the IT interpretation?
Why? Is it because the EC expanded ending makes more sense than the original? Or has people's belief in IT weakened?BansheeOwnage wrote...
That makes sense though. Besides, we all know about the IT interpretation.paxxton wrote...
Is it just me or since the EC was released we've been discussing the literal sense of the ending more often than the IT interpretation?
Modifié par paxxton, 12 juillet 2012 - 11:43 .
Well, it expands upon why they make no sense, so we can figure out why they make no sense and talk about that. That helps IT. It also makes sense because they're new material, and we haven't had as much time to go through them as the original endings.paxxton wrote...
Why? Is it because the EC expanded ending makes more sense than the original? Or has people's belief in IT weakened?BansheeOwnage wrote...
That makes sense though. Besides, we all know about the IT interpretation.paxxton wrote...
Is it just me or since the EC was released we've been discussing the literal sense of the ending more often than the IT interpretation?
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 12 juillet 2012 - 11:45 .
paxxton wrote...
Why? Is it because the EC expanded ending makes more sense than the original? Or has people's belief in IT weakened?BansheeOwnage wrote...
That makes sense though. Besides, we all know about the IT interpretation.paxxton wrote...
Is it just me or since the EC was released we've been discussing the literal sense of the ending more often than the IT interpretation?
LOL. You're right. It's been only 2 weeks since the EC was released.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Well, it expands upon why they make no sense, so we can figure out why they make no sense and talk about that. That helps IT. It also makes sense because they're new material, and we haven't had as much time to go through them as the original endings.paxxton wrote...
Why? Is it because the EC expanded ending makes more sense than the original? Or has people's belief in IT weakened?BansheeOwnage wrote...
That makes sense though. Besides, we all know about the IT interpretation.paxxton wrote...
Is it just me or since the EC was released we've been discussing the literal sense of the ending more often than the IT interpretation?
I don't know of one, but the answer is quite obvious. The reapers are not gods, they can be defeated conventionally.FreddyCast wrote...
Hey guys, do you know a thread that explains whether defeating the Reapers is possible through conventional and/or unconventional means.
What do you mean "is now"?Salient Archer wrote...
Been awhile since I posted anything (lurking is a new pass-time for me) but I figured i'd just post this for ****s and giggles.
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 13 juillet 2012 - 12:09 .
definately not. its stated several times throughout the series that the reapers cannot be defeated conventionally, and in every reaper engagement we see, the organic forces get crushed. remember the casualty report from the FOB? it was like that everywhere, and that was with a united galaxyBansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't know of one, but the answer is quite obvious. The reapers are not gods, they can be defeated conventionally.FreddyCast wrote...
Hey guys, do you know a thread that explains whether defeating the Reapers is possible through conventional and/or unconventional means.
Modifié par jgibson14352, 13 juillet 2012 - 12:15 .
Chriz Tah Fah wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Those 2 are cool. Someone stated though that they are inconsistent with the messages presented during those endings.TJBartlemus wrote...
Okay. Synthesis and Control seems to have tech/machine like soundtrack. Interesting...Control also seems pretty menacing.
Control -
Synthesis -
I mentioned this. I don't believe at all that the songs are consistant with the message of control and synthesis. BUT, the message of renegade control is partly consistant with the song because it sounded like Shepard was vying for power. This would make my previous theory about Harbinger being like Shep (trying to save the galaxy) and eventually losing himself in the power of the reapers and therefore wiping out life every 50,000 years.
Also, about losing your gun in the endings. I looked over the Rejection ending just now and saw the gun in Shepard's hand if you SHOT the kid. I didn't notice one if you rejected through chat options though.
No. They can be defeated conventionally. Period. By our forces? Probably not, but the reapers are just more advanced versions of our ships, and our ships can be defeated conventionally. (Some extragalactic species would probably be more advanced that the reapers and therefore could defeat them conventionally.)jgibson14352 wrote...
definately not. its stated several times throughout the series that the reapers cannot be defeated conventionally,a nd in every reaper engagement we see, the organic forces get crushed. remember the casualty report from the FOB? it was like that everywhereBansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't know of one, but the answer is quite obvious. The reapers are not gods, they can be defeated conventionally.FreddyCast wrote...
Hey guys, do you know a thread that explains whether defeating the Reapers is possible through conventional and/or unconventional means.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
I don't know of one, but the answer is quite obvious. The reapers are not gods, they can be defeated conventionally.FreddyCast wrote...
Hey guys, do you know a thread that explains whether defeating the Reapers is possible through conventional and/or unconventional means.
Modifié par marcelo_sdk, 13 juillet 2012 - 12:23 .
It's probably negative because Bioware doesn't approve our defiance against their "artistic vision".Chriz Tah Fah wrote...
Chriz Tah Fah wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Those 2 are cool. Someone stated though that they are inconsistent with the messages presented during those endings.TJBartlemus wrote...
Okay. Synthesis and Control seems to have tech/machine like soundtrack. Interesting...
Control -
Synthesis -
I mentioned this. I don't believe at all that the songs are consistant with the message of control and synthesis. BUT, the message of renegade control is partly consistant with the song because it sounded like Shepard was vying for power. This would make my previous theory about Harbinger being like Shep (trying to save the galaxy) and eventually losing himself in the power of the reapers and therefore wiping out life every 50,000 years.
Also, about losing your gun in the endings. I looked over the Rejection ending just now and saw the gun in Shepard's hand if you SHOT the kid. I didn't notice one if you rejected through chat options though.
Actually, going back to this I forgot to mention that you shoot the Catalyst with the CARNIFEX. We talked about earlier how the Carnifex is used for negative things. It could be negative because Shepard is condemning the entire galaxy to death?
Thoughts?
Makes me want to 
.
Retour en haut