CoolioThane wrote...
Heretic...you seem to be going on a rant again.
You're right. I really should not get worked up over something so insignificant and silly.
I believe it's dangerous to hold that view about religion because it would offend a **** load of people! Which is a bad thing obviously.
The bible and the quran also offend a ton load of people. They are among the most offensive books I've ever read. Not to mention that these same religious people try to take away the rights of gay people and try to oppress anyone who doesn't believe in their silly book, even going so far as to contracticing science with their own silly "theory" and demanding that their "theory" also gets taught at schools. Imagine the horror if that would truly happen. I don't want my children to be taught about "the controversy". There is no controversy. Intelligent Design is bullcrap and the Theory of Evolution is the only valid explanation science has found to the diversity of life.
But lets stop about this. This is getting off-topic and I'm sure religious discussions are not allowed on BSN. So this is the last thing I'll say about this. Hopefully you understand where I'm coming from.
Hmm, Mass Effect 3 is full of deep writing, especially if you look at all of the tiny details, msot of these are on the Tv Tropes page if you fancy a look, like the Quarian orphan, and Joker's sister etc. It's very, very deep there. Thus it's hard to believe they would screw up the ending...ergo IT.
That's not deep, it's just some nice extra details. If we look at the general plot of Mass Effect we see a lot of silly and cheap plot devices, rectons, screw-ups, specially in ME3. Cerberus must have been the most shallow and stupid antagonist ever, not to mention that it plain didn't make any sense. And how BioWare turned TIM, my favorite ME2 character, into a shallow, cliche, cardboard-cutout villain who's basically just a copy of Saren's character and plot (Saren 2.0) just plain pissed me off.
Bioware would do this. Think og the publicity thus money. Perfection, and bridges the gap between gaming and real life...unprecedented. Fantastic, make the player feel what Shepard feels 
No one is going to buy an incomplete game. Do you honestly think people will attempt at buying Mass Effect 3 now after hearing that the game is incomplete and the real ending has to be bought seperately in DLC? Yeaaahhhhhhhno. And people who already have Mass Effect 3 will only get pissed off. Most of us won't buy an IT ending DLC because it would be cheap, not to say just plain bad and horrible game-design-wise.
The EC was unplanned. They didn't expect such an outcry. It has worked in satiating the angry, let's wait for the IT.
People were already talking a lot about the IT before the EC. BioWare said they won't change their endings several times. When the EC was announced, they still said they won't change the endings, only enhance them, make them longer. Now the EC is released and BioWare kept true to their word. Enhanced endings and no sign of the IT. You know, if BioWare wanted to use the IT (planned or not), then the EC would have been the perfect opportunity to reveal a bit about the truth of the IT. They didn't. There is nothing in the EC that really adds to the IT, only more straw grasping from the IT believes, but no clear hint, clue or indication that the IT is true. This to me made it obvious that he IT is never going to happen.
Besides, didn't BioWare themselves say that they're not going to comment on whether the IT is true or not? They want to leave it open to our interpetation. I don't think that's ever going to change with any DLC. So don't get your hopes up for a IT DLC, just don't and spare yourself the agony.
Mate, whatever Bioware does in the ME Universe after ME3 will invalidate three choices...Indoctrination doesn't invalidate any, it explains them, why you were wrong...or they could go the way of other games where the choice changes the end mission for you or whatevs. I believe Destroy is the only option though. Control/Synthesis indoc, refuse is a mystery.
Which is exactly my point. The IT invalidates my ending by flat out telling me I was wrong and I should feel bad. Now I'm forced ot pick Destroy if I want to continue Shepard's journey. What kind of bullsh*t is that?!?!? Don't you see how incredibly retarded that is? Why not just get rid of the entire Catalyst and just simply retcon the ending completely? That would make even more sense than the IT, which would render the entire final decision completely pointless. Not to say that it's completely against the established gameplay mechanics of Mass Effect, where basically there are no bad choices,
every choice is equally vadid. You can be who you want to be
without being told outright that you're wrong. THAT is the basic premise of Mass Effect and BioWare should NEVER break that.
Modifié par Heretic_Hanar, 13 juillet 2012 - 03:35 .