CoolioThane wrote...
No Hanar, they didn't keep true to their word. They added a new ending and changed the current ones...both things they stated they wouldn't do.
They only enhanced the current endings, not changing them fundamentally, which is eactly what they said they would do.
And the Refusal ending? I see that more a gag ending. A nod and wink towards the fanbase.
Your reason for hating IT is silly. No game released these days is released full. It's just the way it is (it's bad, yeah, but that's how it is)
BULLSH*T. Games that are released at least have all their fundamental parts complete, like a beginning, middle and end. That's as how it should be. Leaving out a certain mission or character to release it later as DLC is already borderline unacceptable, but I can still accept it. But releasing a game without the ending, only to release the ending later and charging us for it? Now THAT'S a ripoff.
EA especially. FIFA used to come with this live season thingy, where it would change stats weekly based on real life performance. in subsequent games they charge for this...it's just the way it it is
Which is nowhere near the same as to releasing an incomplete game without an actual ending.
All DLC proves a game is unfinished?
No it doesn't, only DLC that adds things to the game that already should have been there to begin with like... uhhh I don't know... the real ending?
Any game with post ending content surely proves the game was released unfinished?
No, because like you said, it's POST-ending, e.g. AFTER the ending. That means the ending itself is still in the core game, as it should be.
No, if IT DLC came out it would be an expansion of the ending, bro. you're wrong.
It would be the most retarded and game-breaking expansion ever, that's for sure.