Modifié par estebanus, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:30 .
Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark II!
#45601
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:30
#45602
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:33
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
#45603
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:35
Either.Ardrey wrote...
If anyone's on ME3 PC, I'm going to have a go at Reaper Gold in about an hour. I completed 3 out of 4 of my first intended Golds, so I feel ready to try Reaper for the weekend goal.
I'm on PC. I'm probably gonna play a ton after 9pm EST (in 1 and a half hours). If you want to play, hit me up. Name is the same on Origin BTW.
Edit: It might have underscores instead of spaces actually (Chriz_Tah_Fah)
Edit again: Actually, just message me when I sign onto Origin
Modifié par Chriz Tah Fah, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:37 .
#45604
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:35
It was also very fun! I'm glad we didn't get more than one invisible banshee, though. Saw that and just thought "NOPE. Nopenopenope."CoolioThane wrote...
Well done Maximized!![]()
Me, Banshee and Punny just about managed full extraction too! It was very difficult to say the least xD
#45605
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:38
That info is meaningless, knowing that the Starting point is the Apien Crest, not the Viper Nebula. Not being mean, just pointing out the obvious.Arian Dynas wrote...
FreddyCast wrote...
You're missing my point.Arian Dynas wrote...
WRONG.
The Viper nebula, aside from no longer even HAVING a Mass Relay since we blew it up, could go to ANY other relay in the entire Milky Way.
This was carefully described in The Arrival.
Yes, you can go to any other system using the Viper Nebula. But, in order to get to those locations, you MUST first jump through the Local Cluster Relay before reaching your desired destination.
This is how the Mass Effect 2 Galaxy Map works.
Yes, but they stated that the Alpha relay goes DIRECTLY to all other relays.
#45606
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:47
paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
That's exactly what it is. A role playing game.
If everyone chose Destroy then ME3 as such would've failed; and isn't it more fun that way?
#45607
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:50
Modifié par lex0r11, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:50 .
#45608
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:52
Yup, discussions are more interesting if people involved in them have different opinions. As long as everyone stays civil, of course.MaximizedAction wrote...
paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
That's exactly what it is. A role playing game.
If everyone chose Destroy then ME3 as such would've failed; and isn't it more fun that way?
Modifié par paxxton, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:57 .
#45609
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:53
paxxton wrote...
Yup, discussions are more interesting if people involved in them have different opinions. As long as everyone stays civil, of course.MaximizedAction wrote...
paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
That's exactly what it is. A role playing game.
If everyone chose Destroy then ME3 as such would've failed; and isn't it more fun that way?
Tzz, bunch of sissies.
#45610
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:54
Hey, you're back!estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
#45611
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:57
You changed your avatar. Now I'll never be able to recognize you. Everyone has changed their avatars since EC. Reborn from ashes. Also, (I needed an excuse to post this) this would make a good avatart for you.MaximizedAction wrote...
paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
That's exactly what it is. A role playing game.
If everyone chose Destroy then ME3 as such would've failed; and isn't it more fun that way?
http://desmond.image...png&res=landing
#45612
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:00
Damn, I should have probably written that it was sarcasm, right?paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
#45613
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:01
Modifié par estebanus, 14 juillet 2012 - 12:02 .
#45614
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:01
Yes, I am.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Hey, you're back!estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
#45615
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:02
#45616
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:03
I have one: We use the crucible.FreddyCast wrote...
Has anyone thought of writing a good and explanatory argument on how we can defeat the Reapers with unconventional means?
#45617
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:07
I think I read somewhere about an internet forum phenomenon. It's not always obvious what a person means if a post is smiley-free.estebanus wrote...
Damn, I should have probably written that it was sarcasm, right?paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
#45618
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:07
I agree, however, not in the way it was used in the current endings. Do you have an idea of what the Crucible could actually do? For example, a big EMP weapon meant to disable only the Reapers. What do you have in mind?estebanus wrote...
I have one: We use the crucible.FreddyCast wrote...
Has anyone thought of writing a good and explanatory argument on how we can defeat the Reapers with unconventional means?
#45619
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:08
Yeah, but I don't think I've ver before said that I despise controllers and synthesizers...paxxton wrote...
I think I read somewhere about an internet forum phenomenon. It's not always obvious what a person means if a post is smiley-free.estebanus wrote...
Damn, I should have probably written that it was sarcasm, right?paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
#45620
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:12
So you like destroyers. Reaper Destroyers...estebanus wrote...
Yeah, but I don't think I've ver before said that I despise controllers and synthesizers...paxxton wrote...
I think I read somewhere about an internet forum phenomenon. It's not always obvious what a person means if a post is smiley-free.estebanus wrote...
Damn, I should have probably written that it was sarcasm, right?paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
#45621
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:13
I have thought of an EMP device that could destroy the reapers, but then the problem would be that it could also destroy the allied ships. Maybe that can be used in a EMS case. If your EMS isn't good enough, it could possibly destroy both the reapers and all the allies. If it's high enough, it could only kill the reapers.FreddyCast wrote...
I agree, however, not in the way it was used in the current endings. Do you have an idea of what the Crucible could actually do? For example, a big EMP weapon meant to disable only the Reapers. What do you have in mind?estebanus wrote...
I have one: We use the crucible.FreddyCast wrote...
Has anyone thought of writing a good and explanatory argument on how we can defeat the Reapers with unconventional means?
Maybe the crucible could also be rigged in the fashion that it destroys the reapers' kinetic barriers? That way, they would pretty much be fish in a barrel. Then it could depend on your EMS if your war ssets actually could destroy the reapers, or if the reapers are still too powerful, even if their kinetic barriers were down.
#45622
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:14
#45623
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:14
I like destroyers more because I obviously can identify myself with them.paxxton wrote...
So you like destroyers. Reaper Destroyers...estebanus wrote...
Yeah, but I don't think I've ver before said that I despise controllers and synthesizers...paxxton wrote...
I think I read somewhere about an internet forum phenomenon. It's not always obvious what a person means if a post is smiley-free.estebanus wrote...
Damn, I should have probably written that it was sarcasm, right?paxxton wrote...
I don't. It's just a game. For fun.estebanus wrote...
Don't take it too personally, Paxxton. I generally despise control and its supporters besides of you and HagarIshay.
#45624
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:15
I'm starting to think it's neither.FreddyCast wrote...
That info is meaningless, knowing that the Starting point is the Apien Crest, not the Viper Nebula. Not being mean, just pointing out the obvious.Arian Dynas wrote...
FreddyCast wrote...
You're missing my point.
Yes, you can go to any other system using the Viper Nebula. But, in order to get to those locations, you MUST first jump through the Local Cluster Relay before reaching your desired destination.
This is how the Mass Effect 2 Galaxy Map works.
Yes, but they stated that the Alpha relay goes DIRECTLY to all other relays.
Also here, found this on ye olde thread.
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/9727423/2246#12012564
#45625
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 12:19
Interesting, is the Crucible a one shot deal that affects the entire galaxy like in the endings or could it be a weapon that can be used frequently in every battle against the Reapers. I personally don't like the first idea. The second idea seems more realistic to me.estebanus wrote...
I have thought of an EMP device that could destroy the reapers, but then the problem would be that it could also destroy the allied ships. Maybe that can be used in a EMS case. If your EMS isn't good enough, it could possibly destroy both the reapers and all the allies. If it's high enough, it could only kill the reapers.FreddyCast wrote...
I agree, however, not in the way it was used in the current endings. Do you have an idea of what the Crucible could actually do? For example, a big EMP weapon meant to disable only the Reapers. What do you have in mind?estebanus wrote...
I have one: We use the crucible.FreddyCast wrote...
Has anyone thought of writing a good and explanatory argument on how we can defeat the Reapers with unconventional means?
Maybe the crucible could also be rigged in the fashion that it destroys the reapers' kinetic barriers? That way, they would pretty much be fish in a barrel. Then it could depend on your EMS if your war ssets actually could destroy the reapers, or if the reapers are still too powerful, even if their kinetic barriers were down.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





