Ce sujet est fermé
Jade8aby88 wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Have I missed any announcements?gunslinger_ruiz wrote...
@Jade8aby88
I like it. Think most of us can at least agree Bioware is up to something with all that marvelous DLC planned.
Leviathan will be announced over the next 48 hours.
lex0r11 wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Have I missed any announcements?gunslinger_ruiz wrote...
@Jade8aby88
I like it. Think most of us can at least agree Bioware is up to something with all that marvelous DLC planned.
Leviathan will be announced over the next 48 hours.
Rosewind wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Why is Arian Dyna's avatar Matthew Broderick btw? I mean the character looks like Matthew Broderick
Apprently Arian made it to look like him self lol.
smokingotter1 wrote...
Did anyone ever discuss Freud and IT? I see a lot of similarities between the encounter with TIM, Anderson and the Freudian trio (ID, Superego, Ego). Being that IT states that it's all happening in Shepard's mind/brain there are a lot of hints. The superego is usually stated as the "father figure." I think it's safe to say that (at least for my Shepard, the orphan) that Anderson is in a lot of ways a father figure to Shepard. The superego is also supposed to be the conscience, to the very end Anderson was all about one thing: stopping the reapers at all cost.
TIM would make sense as the ID, the driving force driven by desires, in this case the desire to control, "I only wanted to protect humanity." There is also the death instinct...the task of which is to lead organic life back into the inanimate state" in which case no matter what dialogue options you choose TIM dies, or he kills Anderson, kills Shepard and all parts of his mind including TIM (ID) die.
Shepard would obviously represent the ego. The part that tries to reconcile the two, but fails.
Tl;Dr Reapers take over Shepards ID, Shepard-TIM-Anderson meeting is a representation of Shepard different parts of his mind battling it out.
EDIT: the reason I also mention this is Freudian Trio is a popular tool still used by writers-
http://tvtropes.org/...in/FreudianTrio
Ive also had a similar theory in wich most dlc will lead up into a new ending.Jade8aby88 wrote...
Many of you have probably seen this, but Arian Dynas recommended I put it here also.
It's my new theory I've formed based on information gathered between now and when the EC was released.
This theory is born out of Shepard's marvelous speech about freedom and the right to choose our own fate. And also the Catalyst's puberty taking it's toll when it says "so be it."
The reason being because after such an awesome speech and the catalyst's line, the game just pauses for a bit focusing on Shepard, like something is meant to happen, right around the point the Catalyst says "the cycle continues" with the camera zoomed back. Then the game just kind of drops it on your head that you lost (via Liara's time capsule).
Wouldn't it be cool, if these base 3 endings were because we didn't have all the pieces to the puzzle yet. And so dlc, Omega, Leviathan, other?... adds to it and helps shape better endings.
When I say better, I mean "more win."
We already have the fourth one, which could be acting as a vent for the next one.
So for example..
-|D|-|C|-|S|-
------|---/---
--|Refuse|--
-----/--------
---|S|-|F|---
Success and Fail.
We've already received the fail one being Liara's time capsule. This could be subjugated to just a really low EMS refuse ending cut off line. Then every ending above this line is formed into a single ending (still based on EMS : Success rate) that varies in many different choices from across the three games.
Because Mass Effect is meant to be all about roleplaying and choices. The base endings we got are still endings. What I mean is, because people play their Shepard's differently, they might want a playthrough to compromise with the Catalyst and become a Reaper, Change the galaxy, or if they don't care about the Geth, get a decent ending in itself. Which would be the genius thing as well, because it allows them to see what we'd pick with our canon playthrough, had we only had those options. Then also because it has less to do with the lore and people that didn't play ME1&2 before 3 aren't missing out on things. For instance, our choices from previous games.
This theory also disproves people that complain they sold a game without an ending. Because we did receive "some" of them.
Basically, if this dlc theory holds weight, we could still get astounding endings where we can 'win'.
This theory also assumes they left the Leviathan leaks in the EC on purpose to give us something to hold onto, give us faith something is coming. Because with all the media/consumer outrage that's been going on, to do this by accident would be very slack and lazy, hence a testament to why fans are upset in the first place.
Personal: If this theory is true, and it affects the refuse ending, then it could still be an astounding ending. If not, then I think it's safe to say these endings are permanent. And only then can I have closure.
This idea also dabbles into "speculation" quotes from BioWare, why seek speculation if there's nothing to speculate for? And also the whole thing about closure, and not being able to receive any until we know (for certain) how to view these endings.
ALSO, if there's anything that has been discussed in IT that can relate to this, It would be very welcomed =)
What do you think?
Let the ****storm begin.
Arian Dynas wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Why is Arian Dyna's avatar Matthew Broderick btw? I mean the character looks like Matthew Broderick
Apprently Arian made it to look like him self lol.
I'm vaguely insulted.
My avatar looks only vaguely like me.
I made an effort to make him resemble the Cousland line, I made a distinct effort to make him look like the sort of person who could be related to Fergus, Bryce and Elanora.
I personally look more like this (two years ago at least)
*Snip*
Rosewind wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Why is Arian Dyna's avatar Matthew Broderick btw? I mean the character looks like Matthew Broderick
Apprently Arian made it to look like him self lol.
I'm vaguely insulted.
My avatar looks only vaguely like me.
I made an effort to make him resemble the Cousland line, I made a distinct effort to make him look like the sort of person who could be related to Fergus, Bryce and Elanora.
I personally look more like this (two years ago at least)
*Snip*
Hey you said it not me lol
The only film with him in I like is The Lion King, and you don't have to see his gormless face in that.Arian Dynas wrote...
Yes but, being compared to Matthew "That's Alot of Fish" Broderick, the most boring and uninteresting human being to ever walk this planet is an insult in several cultures. This being one of them.
Modifié par RavenEyry, 14 juillet 2012 - 10:28 .
Arian Dynas wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Why is Arian Dyna's avatar Matthew Broderick btw? I mean the character looks like Matthew Broderick
Apprently Arian made it to look like him self lol.
I'm vaguely insulted.
My avatar looks only vaguely like me.
I made an effort to make him resemble the Cousland line, I made a distinct effort to make him look like the sort of person who could be related to Fergus, Bryce and Elanora.
I personally look more like this (two years ago at least)
*Snip*
Hey you said it not me lol
Yes but, being compared to Matthew "That's Alot of Fish" Broderick, the most boring and uninteresting human being to ever walk this planet is an insult in several cultures. This being one of them.
You leave faris buler out of this!Arian Dynas wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Why is Arian Dyna's avatar Matthew Broderick btw? I mean the character looks like Matthew Broderick
Apprently Arian made it to look like him self lol.
I'm vaguely insulted.
My avatar looks only vaguely like me.
I made an effort to make him resemble the Cousland line, I made a distinct effort to make him look like the sort of person who could be related to Fergus, Bryce and Elanora.
I personally look more like this (two years ago at least)
*Snip*
Hey you said it not me lol
Yes but, being compared to Matthew "That's Alot of Fish" Broderick, the most boring and uninteresting human being to ever walk this planet is an insult in several cultures. This being one of them.
I know, that wasn't directed at you *HUG*Rosewind wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
Arian Dynas wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Why is Arian Dyna's avatar Matthew Broderick btw? I mean the character looks like Matthew Broderick
Apprently Arian made it to look like him self lol.
I'm vaguely insulted.
My avatar looks only vaguely like me.
I made an effort to make him resemble the Cousland line, I made a distinct effort to make him look like the sort of person who could be related to Fergus, Bryce and Elanora.
I personally look more like this (two years ago at least)
*Snip*
Hey you said it not me lol
Yes but, being compared to Matthew "That's Alot of Fish" Broderick, the most boring and uninteresting human being to ever walk this planet is an insult in several cultures. This being one of them.
I never said you looked like him the other person did I said it looked like you not him ><
RavenEyry wrote...
The only film with him in I like is The Lion King, and you don't have to see his gormless face in that.Arian Dynas wrote...
Yes but, being compared to Matthew "That's Alot of Fish" Broderick, the most boring and uninteresting human being to ever walk this planet is an insult in several cultures. This being one of them.
EDIT: Oh wait, The Cable Guy too, but that was a Jim Carrey vehicle.
UltimateTobi wrote...
Good morning ladies and gentlemen.
Damn time zones, eh? ;DDam0299 wrote...
UltimateTobi wrote...
Good morning ladies and gentlemen.
Its evening for me here, though nevertheless. Good morning Tobi
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
Jade8aby88 wrote...
*snip*
What do you think?
Let the ****storm begin.
Sorry, but I think:
As in its too high or too low?Arian Dynas wrote...
I gotta say. Going and having a look at the ME3 metacritic score hurts.
No way in hell it deserves that 4.
That's a bit harsh, he knows what he's talking about despite being very rude. Kinda like you actually.Rifneno wrote...
Don't lie to us. We both know you don't think.
Rifneno's lost brother. Black & White, good and evil.RavenEyry wrote...
That's a bit harsh, he knows what he's talking about despite being very rude. Kinda like you actually.Rifneno wrote...
Don't lie to us. We both know you don't think.
Arian Dynas wrote...
I gotta say. Going and having a look at the ME3 metacritic score hurts.
No way in hell it deserves that 4.
Modifié par lex0r11, 14 juillet 2012 - 10:50 .
Jade8aby88 wrote...
Many of you have probably seen this, but Arian Dynas recommended I put it here also.
It's my new theory I've formed based on information gathered between now and when the EC was released.
This theory is born out of Shepard's marvelous speech about freedom and the right to choose our own fate. And also the Catalyst's puberty taking it's toll when it says "so be it."
The reason being because after such an awesome speech and the catalyst's line, the game just pauses for a bit focusing on Shepard, like something is meant to happen, right around the point the Catalyst says "the cycle continues" with the camera zoomed back. Then the game just kind of drops it on your head that you lost (via Liara's time capsule).
Wouldn't it be cool, if these base 3 endings were because we didn't have all the pieces to the puzzle yet. And so dlc, Omega, Leviathan, other?... adds to it and helps shape better endings.
When I say better, I mean "more win."
We already have the fourth one, which could be acting as a vent for the next one.
So for example..
-|D|-|C|-|S|-
------|---/---
--|Refuse|--
-----/--------
---|S|-|F|---
Success and Fail.
We've already received the fail one being Liara's time capsule. This could be subjugated to just a really low EMS refuse ending cut off line. Then every ending above this line is formed into a single ending (still based on EMS : Success rate) that varies in many different choices from across the three games.
Because Mass Effect is meant to be all about roleplaying and choices. The base endings we got are still endings. What I mean is, because people play their Shepard's differently, they might want a playthrough to compromise with the Catalyst and become a Reaper, Change the galaxy, or if they don't care about the Geth, get a decent ending in itself. Which would be the genius thing as well, because it allows them to see what we'd pick with our canon playthrough, had we only had those options. Then also because it has less to do with the lore and people that didn't play ME1&2 before 3 aren't missing out on things. For instance, our choices from previous games.
This theory also disproves people that complain they sold a game without an ending. Because we did receive "some" of them.
Basically, if this dlc theory holds weight, we could still get astounding endings where we can 'win'.
This theory also assumes they left the Leviathan leaks in the EC on purpose to give us something to hold onto, give us faith something is coming. Because with all the media/consumer outrage that's been going on, to do this by accident would be very slack and lazy, hence a testament to why fans are upset in the first place.
Personal: If this theory is true, and it affects the refuse ending, then it could still be an astounding ending. If not, then I think it's safe to say these endings are permanent. And only then can I have closure.
This idea also dabbles into "speculation" quotes from BioWare, why seek speculation if there's nothing to speculate for? And also the whole thing about closure, and not being able to receive any until we know (for certain) how to view these endings.
ALSO, if there's anything that has been discussed in IT that can relate to this, It would be very welcomed =)
What do you think?
Let the ****storm begin.
Modifié par Eryri, 14 juillet 2012 - 10:54 .
Retour en haut
