Well, how about you tell your father that he's a big stupid jellyfish!Heretic_Hanar wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Ha, joke is on you. The only practice we do is comment on a forum, which you do so that means you are-
"One of us, one of us, one of us!"
Commenting on forums, I think you're confusing cult with "internet generation"... which than I would concede that as a whole the internet generation is very cult like, and very very very very very strange.
Reddit. Enought said.
Oh but I've never denied that I'm strange. This one is indeed strange, very very strange.
You know, I can actually relate to cult people. Most of my friends believe I'm into occult because I don't worship the same gods as they do. They even call me a heretic. My father doesn't want to see me anymore ever since I told him I do not worship the same gods as he does. He's very mad at me now. I think he's just crazy though. He's always wasting all his time preaching his stupid gospel at the presidium.The police told hem several times that he's not allowed to preach in public, but he just doesn't listen. <_<
Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark II!
#46051
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:00
#46052
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:10
estebanus wrote...
Well, how about you tell your father that he's a big stupid jellyfish!Heretic_Hanar wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Ha, joke is on you. The only practice we do is comment on a forum, which you do so that means you are-
"One of us, one of us, one of us!"
Commenting on forums, I think you're confusing cult with "internet generation"... which than I would concede that as a whole the internet generation is very cult like, and very very very very very strange.
Reddit. Enought said.
Oh but I've never denied that I'm strange. This one is indeed strange, very very strange.
You know, I can actually relate to cult people. Most of my friends believe I'm into occult because I don't worship the same gods as they do. They even call me a heretic. My father doesn't want to see me anymore ever since I told him I do not worship the same gods as he does. He's very mad at me now. I think he's just crazy though. He's always wasting all his time preaching his stupid gospel at the presidium.The police told hem several times that he's not allowed to preach in public, but he just doesn't listen. <_<
If I was to tell my fataher that, the implications would be... problematic.
#46053
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:18
#46054
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:23
#46055
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:29
#46056
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:31
#46057
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:31
Hey estebanus and every one! Haven't been here for a while... How is it going ?estebanus wrote...
Well, how about you tell your father that he's a big stupid jellyfish!
Speaking of stupid jellyfish there is a big one hanging around here...
#46058
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:33
You know how it is. They gained courage and appetite after the EC...Rifneno wrote...
IT thread: Troll Buffet.
#46059
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:38
Any further attempt to mock or insult people based on their position in this thread, may it be blunt or hidden in ambiguity, will surely lead to reports in the near future.
It happened before and accounts were banned. So stop pissing on each others legs.
Jebus..
Modifié par lex0r11, 14 juillet 2012 - 08:39 .
#46060
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:39
This is too Uncle Jo.
#46061
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:41
#46062
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:51
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
HellishFiend wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
So, how is my sign offensive to you?
Why should it not be offensive to me?
Because it's just a silly blue banner based on a Mass Effect ending?
No but in all seriousness (super serious this time, not trolling), why do you think control and synthesis banners are offensive?
Interesting. What is your definition of silly? I'm curious as to how it applies in this context. Please elaborate.
#46063
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:53
I support Destroy and Rejection too. IT FTW !!! But does IT really exclude Control and Synthesis from being valid choices? Not necessarily. IT simply states that the ending is an indoctrination attempt. It doesn't say you can't or shouldn't become indoctrinated.
Modifié par paxxton, 14 juillet 2012 - 09:01 .
#46064
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 08:55
HellishFiend wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
HellishFiend wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
So, how is my sign offensive to you?
Why should it not be offensive to me?
Because it's just a silly blue banner based on a Mass Effect ending?
No but in all seriousness (super serious this time, not trolling), why do you think control and synthesis banners are offensive?
Interesting. What is your definition of silly? I'm curious as to how it applies in this context. Please elaborate.
You first. I asked you a question first, twice. I already answered your previou question, it's only polite if you answer my questions now.
#46065
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:00
Also does anyone think that If you become a Reaper you are missing the point that you don't just become a Reaper with one push of a bottun. It takes years to build a Reaper, and we all know that in control Bioware said Shepard becomes a Reaper.
#46066
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:01
#46067
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:02
Never went to any thread just to shove the IT down the throat of everyone, nor to bash any theory. Always spoke about the threads topics. But okay, I'll stay quiet.masster blaster wrote...
Well let's not go down their level about going to every forum and just disproving any speculastions on the endings, which was Biowares plain even before EC.
This is too Uncle Jo.
Modifié par Uncle Jo, 14 juillet 2012 - 09:03 .
#46068
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:03
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
HellishFiend wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
HellishFiend wrote...
Heretic_Hanar wrote...
So, how is my sign offensive to you?
Why should it not be offensive to me?
Because it's just a silly blue banner based on a Mass Effect ending?
No but in all seriousness (super serious this time, not trolling), why do you think control and synthesis banners are offensive?
Interesting. What is your definition of silly? I'm curious as to how it applies in this context. Please elaborate.
You first. I asked you a question first, twice. I already answered your previou question, it's only polite if you answer my questions now.
How do you mean?
#46069
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:04
Do you have any idea that who many
humans it took to make Shepard a Reaper. Billions no millions billion. And in Synthesis you are making everyone
live in a world that is not real. Everyone in the galaxy would
still hate the Reaper, unless the Reapers took over everyones
minds because we put the Reaper codes into everyone. Also
how do we know that Synthesis is all that
Well, I think if in Synthesis all people will get an understanding that Reapers were tools of the Catalyst all the time, and only after Synthesis they became fully sentient, where shouldn't be many haters. Because Reapers were victims of some sort.
P. S. Not trying to be offensive or trollish. Simply playing with ideas.
#46070
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:05
masster blaster wrote...
Heritc just stop. You out of everyone that comes here to this thread is just plain incorrect. IT is not a cult, and it's not some stupied idea. People think it is because they don't get it, or just hate that their Shepard could fall for that.
Okay, maybe IT is indeed not a cult, but I still think it's a stupid theory. That's just my opinion. I can have mine. You can have yours too. You probably think the IT isn't stupid. That's good, that's your opinion and you can have it.
My Shepard didn't fall for anything though. My Shep is the Reaper Overlord now, the God Emperor of Mankind.
Well you did by picking Control.
Please elaborate. How did my Shepard fall for anything when he picked Control? Please no baseless assumptions and speculation, I want in-game sources to back up your claims.
Do you have any idea that who many humans it took to make Shepard a Reaper. Billions no millions billion.
No it didn't. You see, my Shepard isn't a reaper, my Shepard is the Catalyst. Big difference. No humans had to die for that. If you think otherwise, please provide in-game sources to back up your claims.
And in Synthesis you are making everyone live in a world that is not real.
How is the world in synthesis not real? Again, please provide in-game sources to back up your claims.
Everyone in the galaxy would still hate the Reaper, unless the Reapers took over everyones minds because we put the Reaper codes into everyone.
Can you back this up with in-game sources?
Also how do we know that Synthesis is all that. For all we know they got Shepard hooked up to a mechian like Legion was by controling every thing in the galaxy buy using Shepard.
Perhaps, but that is just baseless speculation on your part. Until you have any in-game sources to back this up, your speculation is worthless to me.
#46071
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:05
#46072
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:06
Actually, the Catalyst is not a Reaper per se. It's a metabeing (collective intelligence).masster blaster wrote...
Yet Paxxton do remember that Shepard becomes a Reaper, in which case took like the whole population of Earth too make Shepard the Reaper king. Also If Leviathan can go rogue. I think a lot fo Reapers will side with Harbinger and the Catalyst if something new arises.
Also does anyone think that If you become a Reaper you are missing the point that you don't just become a Reaper with one push of a bottun. It takes years to build a Reaper, and we all know that in control Bioware said Shepard becomes a Reaper.
Also, Shepard isn't becoming a Reaper (despite what the enums in game files say). His thoughts are just made a blueprint for the new Catalyst (which is NOT a Reaper).
Of course, if the Catalyst manipulates Shepard, the above might turn out irrelevant.
Modifié par paxxton, 14 juillet 2012 - 09:10 .
#46073
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:06
And I am not calling you stupid Heritac, just your Avatar.
#46074
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:07
Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
Gonna repost my question again. Did the Catalyst in EC not refer to the Crucible as essentially simply beeing a giant Battery? I cant quite remember, so if anyone could answer it would be nice
It did, yes.
And some of us were guessing that it was that before anyway. Would explain why its able to do things that the makers had no clue about, and how it can be used in three very different ways.
Which means a fourth option of turning it into an actual weapon isn't out of the question.
#46075
Posté 14 juillet 2012 - 09:10
If I recall it good I think that the brat referred to a power source. I'll take a look on youtube and see if I can get a confirmation.Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
Gonna repost my question again. Did the Catalyst in EC not refer to the Crucible as essentially simply beeing a giant Battery? I cant quite remember, so if anyone could answer it would be nice




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





