Lokanaiya wrote...
Iconoclaste, the only objects in Shepard's dreams are trees, shadows/shades, and, in the first one, the boy's toy.... And a bench. Seems a little weird, don't you think?
And for both you and Subastris, what would you call yourselves then?
He might as well have dreamt of a desert, that wouldn't mean much either, and it's ok to interpret these "dreams" as anyone wishes. But if we were to make a poll about the dream's purpose, since that was adressed on a few threads, it could point a bit more towards Shepard's guilt and despair than towards a Reaper deed. Since these dreams happen without the presence of some "big Reaper device", I wonder how some simpler "reaper tech" could have the means to show "elaborate thoughts / dreams" in Shepard's mind. I agree that, to some amount, "Reaper tech" can induce indoc-related effects, but I doubt that a simple set of chips or valve-like apparatus as seen in the Prothean Beacon vision can do such advanced "Indocrination" effects as a whole Reaper would.
As for what to call Subastris and I, frankly, just keep in mind that, even here on the IT thread, people are taking things at face value a lot more than "literalists" are, since most "literalists" won't make a big fuss around small things seen in the game. That is IT's way of bringing up "evidence", not the "literalist's" way! To support IT, "hints" have to be gathered and tied together with some logical thread. So if one brings up a "strange texture", just for the sake of an example, then this is game content taken "at face value" from an IT supporter, and this "hint" will simply go unnoticed by casual players not supporting IT, because those small bits of "evidence" are much harder to integrate in the larger corpus of evidence "supporting IT" (eg plot holes and cutscenes).