55528 réponses à ce sujet

[masster blaster]

paxxton wrote...

So what's the current on-topic topic?

paxxton do you have a theory that you were trying to say the same thing as I did, only a little bit diffrent?

Modifié par masster blaster, 15 juillet 2012 - 11:54 .

[niravital]

paxxton wrote...

Do you think that maybe it was a quick message to those who saw it but they had to unpin the thread because IT being true is their secret? Like "So be IT."

lol 

[paxxton]

masster blaster wrote...

paxxton wrote...

So what's the current on-topic topic?

paxxton do you have a theory that you were trying to say the same thing as I did, only a little bit diffrent?

Not yet. Be patient.

[smokingotter1]

JasonSic wrote...

Simon_Says wrote...

Okay, back to the topic at hand. Again. Hopefully.

So a lot of us are of the opinion that the crucible chamber bears too much resemblance to the beam shuffle. And that Shepard is waltzing around dazed during the crucible choice.

Except then what's going on in the beam shuffle? Is Shepard shuffling around in front of the beam or are they in a coma or what?

If Shepard is derping around in reality, that means choosing systhesis would be shepard walking into the beam to the Citadel. This is interesting.

Or walking into Harbingers beam. Harbinger's laser is going diagonally from the right, the only way to dodge that is to jump to the right.

[Priss Blackburne]

I find it weird that the screen dims right before the cinematic of jumping into the beam. Almost like a fade to black transition. Irks me every time it happens.

[masster blaster]

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

paxxton wrote...

So what's the current on-topic topic?

paxxton do you have a theory that you were trying to say the same thing as I did, only a little bit diffrent?

Not yet. Be patient.

Okay, because right now I have to polls about the Combining of Theory's. So ya.

[estebanus]

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

paxxton wrote...

So what's the current on-topic topic?

paxxton do you have a theory that you were trying to say the same thing as I did, only a little bit diffrent?

Not yet. Be patient.

You can't be serious. Trying to merge Pro-IT theories with non-IT theories is like trying to merge evolution with creationism. It just doesn't work. They're both mutually exclusive.

[masster blaster]

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

paxxton wrote...

So what's the current on-topic topic?

paxxton do you have a theory that you were trying to say the same thing as I did, only a little bit diffrent?

Not yet. Be patient.

You can't be serious. Trying to merge Pro-IT theories with non-IT theories is like trying to merge evolution with creationism. It just doesn't work. They're both mutually exclusive.

But not all Literalist are like that Estebanus. You of all people no
that there are some literalist, that think the endings are just plain
stupid and think Bioware sucks, but some of them put up good arguments
to IT. 

[paxxton]

Actually my new theory states that the ending was an indoctrination attempt but it happened in real life. It was not a dream.

[paxxton]

The theory assumes everything we see in the ending of Mass Effect 3 happened in reality. It was not a dream. Shepard was indoctrinated by Harbinger all the time. Remember that TIM had been heavily augmented with Reaper tech and thus (as he acknowledges himself) was controlled by the Reapers. The black tendrils are easily explained using the Unified Nanide-based Indoctrination Theory (UNIT). Shepard is made to betray a friend (Anderson). He dies for real.

Modifié par paxxton, 16 juillet 2012 - 12:04 .

[Turbo_J]

Just reporting in. Took a break from ME1 data mining to play some MP Gold. Got 2 gold extractions, 5 silver and about 20 bronze on the books for the weekend so I think I did my part for the galaxy. Now I've got a million creds just waiting for Tuesday.

So, how's everyone holding up?

I see some good speculation happening again. Just like it should be.

[masster blaster]

paxxton wrote...

Actually my new theory states that the ending was an indoctrination attempt but it happened in real life. It was not a dream.

Well mine is like a Walking night mer Theory, but with the Literalist, and ITers being right.

[estebanus]

paxxton wrote...

The theory assumes everything we see in the ending
of Mass Effect 3 happened in reality. It was not a
dream. Shepard was indoctrinated by Harbinger all the
time. Remember that TIM had been heavily augmented with
Reaper tech and thus (as he acknowledges himself) was
controlled by the Reapers. The black tendrils are easily
explained using the Unified Nanide-based Indoctrination
Theory (UNIT). Shepard is made to betray a friend
(Anderson). He dies for real.

But that's not what Blaster wants.

[estebanus]

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

paxxton wrote...

So what's the current on-topic topic?

paxxton do you have a theory that you were trying to say the same thing as I did, only a little bit diffrent?

Not yet. Be patient.

You can't be serious. Trying to merge Pro-IT theories with non-IT theories is like trying to merge evolution with creationism. It just doesn't work. They're both mutually exclusive.

But not all Literalist are like that Estebanus. You of all people no
that there are some literalist, that think the endings are just plain
stupid and think Bioware sucks, but some of them put up good arguments
to IT. 

But Blaster, they're both mutually exclusive theories. It doesn't matter what kind of people believe in them.

[paxxton]

The Catalyst is a being of light (from Klencory) indoctrinated by the Reapers to serve as their spiritual representation during the final stages of the indoctrination process.

Modifié par paxxton, 16 juillet 2012 - 12:09 .

[masster blaster]

paxxton wrote...

The Catalyst is a being of light (from Klencory) indoctrinated by the Reapers to serve as their spiritual representation during the final stages of the indoctrination process.

They will most likly be the next antagonest in the next trilogy for sure.

[paxxton]

masster blaster wrote...

paxxton wrote...

The Catalyst is a being of light (from Klencory) indoctrinated by the Reapers to serve as their spiritual representation during the final stages of the indoctrination process.

They will most likly be the next antagonest in the next trilogy for sure.

No because they are the good guys in Mass Effect.

[masster blaster]

paxxton wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

paxxton wrote...

The Catalyst is a being of light (from Klencory) indoctrinated by the Reapers to serve as their spiritual representation during the final stages of the indoctrination process.

They will most likly be the next antagonest in the next trilogy for sure.

No because they are the good guys in Mass Effect.

Um maybe if we pick Control, they mite, but Synthesis ya they are.

Since they wanted to bring order to the cycles but they never did.

Modifié par masster blaster, 16 juillet 2012 - 12:14 .

[paxxton]

The choices are a lie! Shepard will be absorbed by the Reaper Collective or Harbinger's mind in Control and Synthesis and the Reapers' purpose will become his purpose. But he will think the choices really happened.

Modifié par paxxton, 16 juillet 2012 - 12:16 .

[smokingotter1]

Here is another thing that bothers me. Reaper lasers whenever they hit the ground always have that black oily effect which you also see in the destroy ending.

Might be nitpicking.

[masster blaster]

paxxton wrote...

The choices are a lie! Shepard will be absorbed by the Reaper Collective or Harbinger's mind in Control and Synthesis and the Reapers' purpose will become his purpose. But he will think the choices really happened.

And in Refuse they kill Shepard, but in Destroy they try, but fail.

[paxxton]

Even Destroy isn't safe. Only refusing to play a guinea pig can save Shepard.

[masster blaster]

smokingotter1 wrote...

Here is another thing that bothers me. Reaper lasers whenever they hit the ground always have that black oily effect which you also see in the destroy ending.

Might be nitpicking.

Yep it does.

Now if only we can find a place where teh breath scene is at then we can seal the deal.

[estebanus]

masster blaster wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

Here is another thing that bothers me. Reaper lasers whenever they hit the ground always have that black oily effect which you also see in the destroy ending.

Might be nitpicking.

Yep it does.

Now if only we can find a place where teh breath scene is at then we can seal the deal.

How does this "seal the deal?" The only thing that will seal the deal is the word of Bioware.

[Simon_Says]

I-I...

I don't know how to respond to this silliness. I have no sympathy for any of you feculent maggots and no more patience to pretend otherwise. Gentlemen, I wash my hand of this weirdness.