Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark II!
#47626
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:30
I'm pretty sure it's a face - but if anybody is particularly talented with Photoshop and similar programs, how about you help clear up the image...?
#47627
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:30
To what end? If Indoctrination Theory is false then why are you here? If we are 'obviously' wrong, what do you stand to gain by proving us right? We're not your responsibility. You're not doing us a service. You'd be just another person trying to teach the other fools of their own foolishness, revealing to the world that they're a fool themself for undertaking such sisyphean endeavour. And what if, in the insane and unlikely scenario, Bioware unequivocally endorses Indoctrination Theory? Who'd be the fool then?
Why do you want to be here? Because there's absolutely no obligation, moral or otherwise, for you to stay. By all means go elsewhere and share your beliefs with people who won't be insulted, who'll actually take you seriously. But please, please stop provoking us into wasting time responding to your griefing. Because that's what it is. We were having so much fun building sandcastles, but you're trying your best to kick them down for some reason. It's obnoxious.
If you think we're fools, cultists, childish, whatever, then be sensible and let us go. Move on. Leave us to our la-la land. Let our whoops of joy and sighs of relief and declarations of 'victory!' when you finally leave fade away into the distance and away from memory as stupid, worthless things should. Let Bioware and History sort out who is in the right, because you sure as hell can't convince us that it isn't us.
TLDR: ****** off you nonce.
Modifié par Simon_Says, 16 juillet 2012 - 09:11 .
#47628
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:30
I dont think you know what that word really means...Rosewind wrote...
Let me guess we were un pinned and the trolls thought it would be funny to come in and annoy us?
#47629
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:30
No...this is the internet. Where emotions go off to die. [/Edi: That was a Joke]ll PAYASO323 ll wrote...
Jesus, no one here can take a joke huh? LolGethPrimeMKII wrote...
ll PAYASO323 ll wrote...
"Damn IT-ers are a bunch of blind stubborn morons!"D.Sharrah wrote...
"Bad writing, I thought we had dismissed that claim"
Calling them morons is uncalled for. Before dismissing them as morons, maybe take the time to learn about the theory and then make your conclusions.
#47630
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:31
ll PAYASO323 ll wrote...
Might i suggest lightening up? ******GethPrimeMKII wrote...
ll PAYASO323 ll wrote...
Jesus, no one here can take a joke huh? LolGethPrimeMKII wrote...
ll PAYASO323 ll wrote...
"Damn IT-ers are a bunch of blind stubborn morons!"D.Sharrah wrote...
"Bad writing, I thought we had dismissed that claim"
Calling them morons is uncalled for. Before dismissing them as morons, maybe take the time to learn about the theory and then make your conclusions.
You're not much of a comedian. Might I suggest not quitting your day job.
Might I suggest getting back on topic?
#47631
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:31
lol ever heard of confirmation bias?Andromidius wrote...
alienatedflea wrote...
IT is based on spectulation...Thats the only fact that IT has going for itself....
Speculation, thematic evidence, visual clues, plotholes...
There's a lot more to it then you're making out. And I expect you know this as well.
#47632
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:31
#47633
Guest_ll PAYASO323 ll_*
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:32
Guest_ll PAYASO323 ll_*
All i see is rubblemasster blaster wrote...
PatheticMan wrote...
Does anybody else see it?
I do. It looks like the face to me. But I could be wrong.
#47634
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:32
alienatedflea wrote...
lol ever heard of confirmation bias?Andromidius wrote...
alienatedflea wrote...
IT is based on spectulation...Thats the only fact that IT has going for itself....
Speculation, thematic evidence, visual clues, plotholes...
There's a lot more to it then you're making out. And I expect you know this as well.
Lol have you ever considered that you're just as succeptible to it as we are?
Lol you are so ****ing funny.
Lol, go soak your head.
Yes I am highly annoyed right now and I'm going to share it. Enjoy mother****ers.
#47635
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:32
Modifié par masster blaster, 16 juillet 2012 - 03:36 .
#47636
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:34
ll PAYASO323 ll wrote...
All i see is rubblemasster blaster wrote...
PatheticMan wrote...
Does anybody else see it?
I do. It looks like the face to me. But I could be wrong.
Yes.
Specifically concrete.
From London.
It matches the crumbling patterns, it LOOKS like concrete, and it has the same pattern the concrete in the forward base did, as well as the same spacing between the places where the concrete joined.
#47637
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:34
There is a reason the ending is as it is. If Bioware had "done right" the first time around, then starchild wouldn't exist. We would have had a completely different ending where you don't get to choose what coulour the crucible should fire. We would have a completely different ending. The endings as we have now are intentionally ambiguous.alienatedflea wrote...
lol yes that is exactly it otherwise...if bioware did all 16 endings PERFECT, Indoctrination theory would not exist...are you telling me that IT would still exist if the endings were done right the first time around? bullsh@testebanus wrote...
So you think that the only reason people like the IT is because they don't like the endings, not because the theory in itself is very compelling?
All Right then. Why are you here if that is all you can add? Is it fun insulting people? Does it make you feel like a big man? Trying to make up for something?
But according to the IT, Bioware did in fact "do right."
#47638
Guest_ll PAYASO323 ll_*
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:34
Guest_ll PAYASO323 ll_*
Apparently these are words of wisdom, my friend.Either.Ardrey wrote...
No...this is the internet. Where emotions go off to die. [/Edi: That was a Joke]ll PAYASO323 ll wrote...
Jesus, no one here can take a joke huh? LolGethPrimeMKII wrote...
ll PAYASO323 ll wrote...
"Damn IT-ers are a bunch of blind stubborn morons!"D.Sharrah wrote...
"Bad writing, I thought we had dismissed that claim"
Calling them morons is uncalled for. Before dismissing them as morons, maybe take the time to learn about the theory and then make your conclusions.
#47639
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:34
Simon_Says wrote...
Alienated, this is our time and our space you're treading upon. For the vast majority of the IT camp, outside of this thread we may invite attention and speculation, but we will not tread on everyone else's beliefs and attempt to replace their opinions with our own. You are here doing exactly that: you've marched right into the pagan camp, trying to convert the misguided heathens. The simple fact is that you're spending significant time and effort insulting us.
To what end, Hanar? If Indoctrination Theory is false then why are you here? If we are 'obviously' wrong, what do you stand to gain by proving us right? We're not your responsibility. You're not doing us a service. You'd be just another person trying to teach the other fools of their own foolishness, revealing to the world that they're a fool themself for undertaking such sisyphean endeavour. And what if, in the insane and unlikely scenario, Bioware unequivocally endorses Indoctrination Theory? Who'd be the fool then?
Why do you want to be here? Because there's absolutely no obligation, moral or otherwise, for you to stay. By all means go elsewhere and share your beliefs with people who won't be insulted, who'll actually take you seriously. But please, please stop provoking us into wasting time responding to your griefing. Because that's what it is. We were having so much fun building sandcastles, but you're trying your best to kick them down for some reason. It's obnoxious.
If you think we're fools, cultists, childish, whatever, then be sensible and let us go. Move on. Leave us to our la-la land. Let our whoops of joy and sighs of relief and declarations of 'victory!' when you finally leave fade away into the distance and away from memory as stupid, worthless things should. Let Bioware and History sort out who is in the right, because you sure as hell can't convince us that it isn't us.
TLDR: ****** off you nonce.
yup...so the way to strengthen IT is to outcast all those who oppose you? lol NICE WORK
#47640
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:35
#47641
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:35
Rosewind wrote...
Let me guess we were un pinned and the trolls thought it would be funny to come in and annoy us?
no that's my fault. i was at "' Why do people hate IT" and I said if you like IT, and want to learn more about IT then come by [thread name] and join the family.
#47642
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:35
lol so you are suggesting that EC was Bioware's version of trolling IT?estebanus wrote...
There is a reason the ending is as it is. If Bioware had "done right" the first time around, then starchild wouldn't exist. We would have had a completely different ending where you don't get to choose what coulour the crucible should fire. We would have a completely different ending. The endings as we have now are intentionally ambiguous.
But according to the IT, Bioware did in fact "do right."
#47643
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:35
I don't think you know what the words "sensible" and "respectful" mean.alienatedflea wrote...
I dont think you know what that word really means...Rosewind wrote...
Let me guess we were un pinned and the trolls thought it would be funny to come in and annoy us?
#47644
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:36
alienatedflea wrote...
Simon_Says wrote...
Alienated, this is our time and our space you're treading upon. For the vast majority of the IT camp, outside of this thread we may invite attention and speculation, but we will not tread on everyone else's beliefs and attempt to replace their opinions with our own. You are here doing exactly that: you've marched right into the pagan camp, trying to convert the misguided heathens. The simple fact is that you're spending significant time and effort insulting us.
To what end, Hanar? If Indoctrination Theory is false then why are you here? If we are 'obviously' wrong, what do you stand to gain by proving us right? We're not your responsibility. You're not doing us a service. You'd be just another person trying to teach the other fools of their own foolishness, revealing to the world that they're a fool themself for undertaking such sisyphean endeavour. And what if, in the insane and unlikely scenario, Bioware unequivocally endorses Indoctrination Theory? Who'd be the fool then?
Why do you want to be here? Because there's absolutely no obligation, moral or otherwise, for you to stay. By all means go elsewhere and share your beliefs with people who won't be insulted, who'll actually take you seriously. But please, please stop provoking us into wasting time responding to your griefing. Because that's what it is. We were having so much fun building sandcastles, but you're trying your best to kick them down for some reason. It's obnoxious.
If you think we're fools, cultists, childish, whatever, then be sensible and let us go. Move on. Leave us to our la-la land. Let our whoops of joy and sighs of relief and declarations of 'victory!' when you finally leave fade away into the distance and away from memory as stupid, worthless things should. Let Bioware and History sort out who is in the right, because you sure as hell can't convince us that it isn't us.
TLDR: ****** off you nonce.
yup...so the way to strengthen IT is to outcast all those who oppose you? lol NICE WORK
We don't cast out those who oppose us.
We just cast out the people who can't avoid being ****s about their debates and are incapable of giving a well reasoned argument.
So I'll second Simon when I say, ****** off.
#47645
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:37
alienatedflea wrote...
lol so you are suggesting that EC was Bioware's version of trolling IT?estebanus wrote...
There is a reason the ending is as it is. If Bioware had "done right" the first time around, then starchild wouldn't exist. We would have had a completely different ending where you don't get to choose what coulour the crucible should fire. We would have a completely different ending. The endings as we have now are intentionally ambiguous.
But according to the IT, Bioware did in fact "do right."
No, the EC was Bioware's way of covering their ass and making it to where people like you would be less likely to burn them at the stake.
#47646
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:37
#47647
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:37
What?alienatedflea wrote...
lol so you are suggesting that EC was Bioware's version of trolling IT?estebanus wrote...
There is a reason the ending is as it is. If Bioware had "done right" the first time around, then starchild wouldn't exist. We would have had a completely different ending where you don't get to choose what coulour the crucible should fire. We would have a completely different ending. The endings as we have now are intentionally ambiguous.
But according to the IT, Bioware did in fact "do right."
And seriously, how about you actually start sounding like you're not flamebating and trolling, preferably by stopping saying "lol" constantly?
#47648
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:37
masster blaster wrote...
Rosewind wrote...
Let me guess we were un pinned and the trolls thought it would be funny to come in and annoy us?
no that's my fault. i was at "' Why do people hate IT" and I said if you like IT, and want to learn more about IT then come by [thread name] and join the family.
Why would you do that..... It was nice and peaceful in here.
#47649
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:38
masster blaster wrote...
Alienantedflea I am the only one that is trying to be nice to you, so you can at least repay me and give IT a try and if you don't like then oh well. I am not going to force you to believe in what you think is wrong. It's just that, it's not all that bad and it's been fun. Also these people are fun to hang around with once you get to know them so please give IT a shot. or just leave please.
#47650
Guest_ll PAYASO323 ll_*
Posté 16 juillet 2012 - 03:39
Guest_ll PAYASO323 ll_*
Actually thats exactly what i thought the first time around lolalienatedflea wrote...
lol so you are suggesting that EC was Bioware's version of trolling IT?estebanus wrote...
There is a reason the ending is as it is. If Bioware had "done right" the first time around, then starchild wouldn't exist. We would have had a completely different ending where you don't get to choose what coulour the crucible should fire. We would have a completely different ending. The endings as we have now are intentionally ambiguous.
But according to the IT, Bioware did in fact "do right."




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




