BansheeOwnage wrote...
Go to page 1, read the evidence. If it has little supporting evidence it shouldn't take too long huh?memorysquid wrote...
I refuse to accept that the ending was so bad it justifies approaching 2000 pages of posts on a theory that had little supporting evidence to begin with and was completely destroyed by the EC. Let's exercise a little self-control, people.
It shouldn't take too long, you're right. It does because people talk a lot. Even in the first post-EC IT support video linked there, the commentator immediately grants that IT is not the route BW went, but maybe IT can be salvaged as an interpretation. The point is that literally anything can be salvaged if you are willing to take a loose enough interpretation. At some point, certainly the point after which the writer says you are all wrong, your interpretation becomes simple invention.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut









