For a bit of fun from the Youtube front;
Then I'll say this, Antagonists are not wrong or evil by definition. They simply oppose the PROtagonist. However, TIM and Saren are not just antagonists, thy're Villains, with a capital V, they commit horrendous crimes, the Reapers commit horrendous warcrimes and slaughter trillions of innocent beings. Them having a reason that seems logical to them does not excuse that. Far be it for me to invoke Godwin's law, but Hitler thought the Final Solution was pretty logical too, doesn't make him right.
ariandynas in reply to NoobOfLore 4 days ago
Reply
I don't think they're doing things as they should.
Their motivations, on the other hand, are hardly ignoble. That said, they all definitely need to be stopped.
I don't claim that I should follow the orders of these antagonists, but doing what they were intending to, WITHOUT the violent subjugation and sustained unethical experimentation, was not wrong.
So they were not wrong in what they were trying to do, they were wrong in what they were willing to sacrifice to their utopia.
NoobOfLore in reply to ariandynas 4 days ago
The best villains always have the best of intentions. Well, for the most part anyway.
In fact, I hear the road to this lovely little place called Hell is paved with them.
ariandynas in reply to NoobOfLore 3 days ago
Cliches don't count as arguments. I addressed the problems with what TIM and Saren did, and bypassed the overtly oppressive and violent methods they require to get there with the Space Baby's other options.
TIM wanted to control, but he was indoctrinated and his original plan needed him to fatally experiment on millions/billions.
Saren's plan for unification needed the forcible subjugation of all organic races, with the help of the Heretic Geth.
Control and Synthesis did not have those problems.
NoobOfLore in reply to ariandynas 3 days ago
Control and Synthesis do have those problems.
You are choosing between altering an entire galaxy of beings without their consent. EDI and the Geth would not be pleased, Javik would sooner throw himself out the airlock than become what we see in Synthesis, and many others would feel the same.
In control, you become a dictator in command of an army of the dead, placed in perpetual torment. Every Reaper was an individual at one point. Would YOU want that fate?
ariandynas in reply to NoobOfLore 3 days ago
I think I can handle EDI's and the Geth's scorn for the chance to not kill all of them and to set technology forwards hundreds of years instead of backwards.
I do recognize that there are some invasive issues with Synthesis. I know what Javik would think, I disagree with him on many points. I pity the people who would be unable to cope, but these sorts of people exist during all types of technological and historical revolutions, and I'm not going to let them keep me from saving the Geth.
CONT--
NoobOfLore in reply to ariandynas 2 days ago
Just want you to know; " Humanity will advance more than the last 10,000 years combined!"
"Listen to yourself! You're indoctrinated!"
You are believing exactly what they want you to believe. You say the Catalyst has no reason to make you not trust him. But he doesn't have anything to make you trust him either!
ariandynas in reply to NoobOfLore 2 days ago
Suggesting that I am literally indoctrinated is conspiracy theorizing to the highest degree, and really has no basis in logic. I didn't make the decision as Shepard, I made the decision as myself.
I don't have reason to trust Space Baby over there. However, he is the ONLY SOURCE of information regarding what the options do, and as demonstrated in the EC, he was not wrong. He implied, of course, that I would die upon destroy (which is still likely) but this is the only discrepancy.
NoobOfLore in reply to ariandynas 2 days ago
Indoctrinate - Verb 1. To teach a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically.
He is not the only source of information. There's Javik, who flat out tells you that attempting to Control the Reapers will only be met with failure, and we have seen on two occasions where Synthesis and Control have failed spectacularly.
Either way, type in SentraMaster and Choose Wisely into your Google box and watch his video for a more eloquent explanation about Control and Synthesis.
ariandynas in reply to NoobOfLore 19 hours ago
I've given an entire plethora of reasons, literally zero of which have been refuted by you. I don't need to be indoctrinated to hold any view other than your own personally preferred one.
Space Baby was the only source of information on what each of the mechanisms actually did. Javik could not have told me "jumping into the glowey beam would turn all organics into synthetics, that's bad!" Nobody was there to actually tell me what all the things were SUPPOSED to do, other than Space Baby.
--CONT
NoobOfLore in reply to ariandynas 14 hours ago
Look buddy.
1). Calm the **** down. It's a videogame.
2). It was a joke. But you can't deny that the viewpoint you're touting is remarkably close to the enemy's. An enemy know for being subversive and deleterious by their very nature.
3). I'm not going to give you a point by point simply because it is a conversation I am not involved in, and not genuinely worth my time.
4). Stop using "propaganda" it is not appropriate for what we are talking about.
5). You didn't read the annotations.
ariandynas in reply to NoobOfLore 13 hours ago
You are either involved in this discussion or not. If "not being involved" is your excuse for dodgy and ineffectual reasoning, then there is no merit to hearing your arguments.
The annotations didn't bring me anything that I didn't understand from watching the videos. I recognized the themes as they came up and disagreed for already stated reasons.
As a rhetorical tool, my use of the word "Propaganda" works just fine.
I'm plenty calm, your disingenuous accusations have been taken in stride.
NoobOfLore in reply to ariandynas 13 hours ago
Very well then. I am not involved in this farce (as a rhetorical tool, my use of the word face works just fine.) You already made your decision, which you are not changing, nor will you allow to be changed. There is no conversation to be had when the parties are not open to oneanother. And before you say I am being hypocritical (which, I am sure you were about to) I am open, as loathe as I am to admit it, that the ending may be literal. However, I prefer to consider a different turn of events.
See what I have to put up with?