Massa FX wrote...
Why didn't the prothean VI detect that Shepard was indoctrinated on Thessia and later on Cronos? Why didn't Javik, who has a lifetime experience dealing with indoctrinated friend, crew, and enemies.
Everything else fits IT except this.
I also agree that Shepard should have realised she might be under Reaper influence from Arrival forward. In Arrival she stood next to a Prothean artifact and the black swirly mist came around her. She fell to the floor fighting it. But... damage was done. At the end of Arrival, Hackett asks Shepard how she feels. She says headaches are better or something along those lines.
>Prothean VIs can detect indoctrination. We don't know how.
>Prothean Crucible effort sabotaged by indoctrinated agents. VIs are not infallible then.
>Vigil detected Saren. Vendetta detected Kai Leng. Both had
reaper implants. Obvous sign of indoctrination.
>Shepard was
being indoctrinated, but wasn't
actually indoctrinated. (i.e. a similar difference to "dying" and "dead")
>Shepard is then very likely under the limit for indoctrination detection.
VIs still fit within IT. Case closed.
Also, Javik had to find and murder his indoctrinated squad. He couldn't see the signs before it was too late. No reason to believe he would detect indoctrination in a person he barely knows, from a species he barely knows.
Javik still fits within IT. Case closed.
The only actual discrepencies I know of are...
>The Crucible's true nature. It's a complete unknown. Even the Catalyst's explanation of it being a giant battery is suspect as it implies that Space Magic is a function of the Citadel, not the Crucible, and thus raises the question why the reapers didn't build a crucible themselves.
>The scenes in space with Hacket/Normandy when the Crucible is 'triggered', and the Normandy scenes that follow. Unlikely to be part of the hallucination. But if they're real, what just happened with the Crucible then? Only possible explanation is that Shepard somehow remotely triggered the Crucible, and although there is precedent that such a thing is possible (Sarenbot, Geth Concensus), it's still a stretch.
The epilogues don't need to be hallucinations, by the way.
>Synthesis shows an indoctrinated future.
>Control shows a cycle under reaper tyranny.
>Reject shows the council cycle destroyed and a new cycle having faced the reapers. We don't know for certain if they were truly succesful or not.
>Destroy shows the reapers defeated and the galaxy rebuilding.
These are all actually consistent with what IT postulates. Indoctrinated Shepard ends the war in the reapers' favour. Rejecting Shepard cannot beat the reapers, so the council cycle gets eliminated. Destroy Shepard either actually finished the fight, or will live to finish the fight. Just because the destroy epilogue didn't specifically show that last fight doesn't mean it didn't/won't happen.
You guys just need to let go of the idea that the story is told in strict chronological progression.
Modifié par Simon_Says, 28 juillet 2012 - 06:39 .