Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark II!


55528 réponses à ce sujet

#54651
Nightingale

Nightingale
  • Members
  • 756 messages
Reposting since it seems it was missed and it's relevant :P

DrTsoni wrote...

I'm not sure if it's what he's talking about, but if you have the extended clip, for example, it'll change the colour of the gun. This carries over to change the colour of the Predator part of it during this..."glitch" if you have it equipped, regardless of whether you were using the Predator prior to being hit by Harbinger and being forced to use the Carnifex.



#54652
prettz

prettz
  • Members
  • 240 messages

Dwailing wrote...



Oh, now that you mention it,
I MIGHT have been using the Predator during regular gameplay...  Give mea minute to check.  Darn, and here I thought I found something awesome.  Although... did anyone ever bring an upgraded Predator to that
scene pre-EC and see the upgrades on it?

Edit: OK, as of the quick save I made 30 minutes before the Restart Mission save for Citadel: The Return, I had a Carnifex equiped with the capacity and stunner mods attached.  The mod I saw on the Carnipredifexator in
Destroy was the barrel mod.  Maybe that's what I have attached to the Predator currently even though I don't have it equiped...



I have upgrades show up when I auto save glitch it.  this if before EC. It would be what I had equipped for the gun. from my view it seem more of a loading glitch since I never had it happen if I played the game normally.

RavenEyry wrote...

Eryri wrote...

Dam0299 wrote...

snip


There's a regular poster on these boards calles Pretzz who's done a whole video about it -  

Most of the video is pretty superflous so TL;DW: The body is of Major Coates. EC also adds a scene of Coates alive after this scene, making it way more suspicious.

:( Is it really to long ?

Modifié par prettz, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:26 .


#54653
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

DrTsoni wrote...

Reposting since it seems it was missed and it's relevant :P

DrTsoni wrote...

I'm not sure if it's what he's talking about, but if you have the extended clip, for example, it'll change the colour of the gun. This carries over to change the colour of the Predator part of it during this..."glitch" if you have it equipped, regardless of whether you were using the Predator prior to being hit by Harbinger and being forced to use the Carnifex.


Soooooo I'm right that it's weird compared to what usually happens when it gives you a Predator during cutscenes?

Edit: What I mean is, are the upgrades you have equiped on the Predator even when you don't have it equiped for use ONLY reflected in this one particular cutscene that it gives you the Predator in?

Modifié par Dwailing, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:27 .


#54654
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages
Hello. What have I missed today?

#54655
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

#54656
MegumiAzusa

MegumiAzusa
  • Members
  • 4 238 messages
No additional comments about my last post? sadface.jpg
^^

#54657
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

prettz wrote...

RavenEyry wrote...

Eryri wrote...

Dam0299 wrote...

snip


There's a regular poster on these boards calles Pretzz who's done a whole video about it -  

Most of the video is pretty superflous so TL;DW: The body is of Major Coates. EC also adds a scene of Coates alive after this scene, making it way more suspicious.

:( Is it really to long ?

Don't listen to them, prettz. You've done a great job with the videos on your channel. You further our cause and thank you for that. I'd suggest making a 2h-long movie about IT, something like Clevernoob's docu. Enjoyed watching the one above.

Modifié par paxxton, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:35 .


#54658
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details? Posted Image

Modifié par paxxton, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:36 .


#54659
smokingotter1

smokingotter1
  • Members
  • 735 messages

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details?


Well I did propose that all theories have something similar to an event horizon; when a theory like IT reachs critcal mass we begin to approach what I call the "lesbian sigularity." Ladies and gentleman, we have reached critical mass.

#54660
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

MegumiAzusa wrote...

No additional comments about my last post? sadface.jpg
^^

The line between friend and foe becomes blurry. On one picture the Reapers devastate a Prothean City, on the other they rebuild London.

Modifié par paxxton, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:41 .


#54661
Humakt83

Humakt83
  • Members
  • 1 893 messages

prettz wrote...

RavenEyry wrote...

Eryri wrote...

There's a regular poster on these boards calles Pretzz who's done a whole video about it -  

Most of the video is pretty superflous so TL;DW: The body is of Major Coates. EC also adds a scene of Coates alive after this scene, making it way more suspicious.

:( Is it really to long ?


Nope, it was well-made and fairly entertaining. I don't remember seeing that Cerberus symbol on the shuttle before. Also the TIM's expression gave me the creeps.

Modifié par Humakt83, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:41 .


#54662
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

smokingotter1 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details?


Well I did propose that all theories have something similar to an event horizon; when a theory like IT reachs critcal mass we begin to approach what I call the "lesbian sigularity." Ladies and gentleman, we have reached critical mass.

"Lesbian Singularity"? I do not comprehend, could you elaborate?

#54663
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

Humakt83 wrote...

prettz wrote...

RavenEyry wrote...

Eryri wrote...

There's a regular poster on these boards calles Pretzz who's done a whole video about it -  

Most of the video is pretty superflous so TL;DW: The body is of Major Coates. EC also adds a scene of Coates alive after this scene, making it way more suspicious.

:( Is it really to long ?


Nope, it was well-made and fairly entertaining. I don't remember seeing that Cerberus symbol on the shuttle before. Also the TIM's expression gave me the creeps.


It's not too long.  A more accurate statement would be, "Most of the video is pretty superflous for the couple of Coats's oddities that we're discussing at the moment."  Better? Posted Image

#54664
Nightingale

Nightingale
  • Members
  • 756 messages

smokingotter1 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details?


Well I did propose that all theories have something similar to an event horizon; when a theory like IT reachs critcal mass we begin to approach what I call the "lesbian sigularity." Ladies and gentleman, we have reached critical mass.


...I am utterly lost now.

Dwailing wrote...

DrTsoni wrote...

Reposting since it seems it was missed and it's relevant Posted Image

DrTsoni wrote...

I'm
not sure if it's what he's talking about, but if you have the extended
clip, for example, it'll change the colour of the gun. This carries over
to change the colour of the Predator part of it during this..."glitch"
if you have it equipped, regardless of whether you were using the
Predator prior to being hit by Harbinger and being forced to use the
Carnifex.


Soooooo I'm right that it's weird compared to what usually happens when it gives you a Predator during cutscenes?

Edit: What
I mean is, are the upgrades you have equiped on the Predator even when
you don't have it equiped for use ONLY reflected in this one particular
cutscene that it gives you the Predator in?


No, it seems to be unique to this. Even modded, if forced to use a Predator in cutscenes, it remains unmodded when not equipped. Though there may have been a scene with a modded Avenger when I wasn't using it...I may have to check on that, though.

#54665
smokingotter1

smokingotter1
  • Members
  • 735 messages

paxxton wrote...

MegumiAzusa wrote...

No additional comments about my last post? sadface.jpg
^^

The line between friend and foe becomes blurry. On one picture the Reapers devastate a Prothean City, on the other they rebuild London.


Interesting post, didn't comment because I don't know what to think at the moment... whiskey is not helping.:wizard: Could have commented "derp" but probably would not have helped conversation Also derp.

#54666
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 811 messages

paxxton wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details?


Well I did propose that all theories have something similar to an event horizon; when a theory like IT reachs critcal mass we begin to approach what I call the "lesbian sigularity." Ladies and gentleman, we have reached critical mass.

"Lesbian Singularity"? I do not comprehend, could you elaborate?


Its like the technological singularity, but with lesbians.

#54667
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

paxxton wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details?


Well I did propose that all theories have something similar to an event horizon; when a theory like IT reachs critcal mass we begin to approach what I call the "lesbian sigularity." Ladies and gentleman, we have reached critical mass.

"Lesbian Singularity"? I do not comprehend, could you elaborate?


I too wish to learn certain details about what brought about this particular phrase.  Did it have something to do with the inbalance between the heterosexual and homosexual romances available to ManShep vs. FemShep?  Or was it an all together different topic that spawned this most interesting of expressions?

To put it in plain English, what the heck are you talking about mate? Posted Image

#54668
MegumiAzusa

MegumiAzusa
  • Members
  • 4 238 messages
Again some stuff:
Posted Image
this is how the Citadel looks in destroy
Posted Image
this is control
so now why is the beam active in destroy
Posted Image
but not in control
Posted Image

It's also interesting that in Control and Destroy for these pictures Earth is named, but in Synthesis it's not.

Than for the Coates stuff:
His videos are named:
End03_S_CoatesReb
End03_D_CoatesRebHi
End03_D_CoatesRebMin

The Reb could stand for Rebuild, but that would be inconsistent with other occurrences like End03_D_TutCT_TutRebuild where Rebuild is always a full word. Because of that, and we know he is dead on the Citadel it maybe should be something else? Like rebirth? Rebuild also wouldn't fit with the Min version as there is nothing rebuilt.

Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:48 .


#54669
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

Dwailing wrote...

paxxton wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details?


Well I did propose that all theories have something similar to an event horizon; when a theory like IT reachs critcal mass we begin to approach what I call the "lesbian sigularity." Ladies and gentleman, we have reached critical mass.

"Lesbian Singularity"? I do not comprehend, could you elaborate?


I too wish to learn certain details about what brought about this particular phrase.  Did it have something to do with the inbalance between the heterosexual and homosexual romances available to ManShep vs. FemShep?  Or was it an all together different topic that spawned this most interesting of expressions?

To put it in plain English, what the heck are you talking about mate? Posted Image


None of the above.

#54670
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 811 messages
Megumi, I'm still trying to figure out what the **** I'm looking at in this picture:

Posted Image

I know you said it is named future city or something, but I dont see how that could possibly be a city.

Or really anything else for that matter.

Modifié par byne, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:51 .


#54671
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

DrTsoni wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

DrTsoni wrote...

Reposting since it seems it was missed and it's relevant Posted Image

DrTsoni wrote...

I'm
not sure if it's what he's talking about, but if you have the extended
clip, for example, it'll change the colour of the gun. This carries over
to change the colour of the Predator part of it during this..."glitch"
if you have it equipped, regardless of whether you were using the
Predator prior to being hit by Harbinger and being forced to use the
Carnifex.


Soooooo I'm right that it's weird compared to what usually happens when it gives you a Predator during cutscenes?

Edit: What
I mean is, are the upgrades you have equiped on the Predator even when
you don't have it equiped for use ONLY reflected in this one particular
cutscene that it gives you the Predator in?


No, it seems to be unique to this. Even modded, if forced to use a Predator in cutscenes, it remains unmodded when not equipped. Though there may have been a scene with a modded Avenger when I wasn't using it...I may have to check on that, though.


So I was right!  Now, as I said earlier, what could it mean?  Is it another hint that something is up with this scene?  Because if it's not, then I have no frakking clue why they would put in the extra work to reflect your mods for the Predator in a scene where the average gamer ISN'T EVEN GOING TO NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE.  If nothing else, this IS a strike against the BioWare is lazy argument that keeps popping up. 

#54672
smokingotter1

smokingotter1
  • Members
  • 735 messages

paxxton wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details?


Well I did propose that all theories have something similar to an event horizon; when a theory like IT reachs critcal mass we begin to approach what I call the "lesbian sigularity." Ladies and gentleman, we have reached critical mass.

"Lesbian Singularity"? I do not comprehend, could you elaborate?


Being an otter I don't fully understand human relationships, but the lesbian singularity is when intellegent people reach an impasse on a theory and being bored natually move the conversation to lesbians. How do I know this and am not totally BS-ing? Trust me I'm an otter.

#54673
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

estebanus wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

paxxton wrote...

smokingotter1 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Hello. What have I missed today?

Lesbian talk. Lots of lesbian talk.

Nice. Posted Image //Gamer Poop
Any details?


Well I did propose that all theories have something similar to an event horizon; when a theory like IT reachs critcal mass we begin to approach what I call the "lesbian sigularity." Ladies and gentleman, we have reached critical mass.

"Lesbian Singularity"? I do not comprehend, could you elaborate?


I too wish to learn certain details about what brought about this particular phrase.  Did it have something to do with the inbalance between the heterosexual and homosexual romances available to ManShep vs. FemShep?  Or was it an all together different topic that spawned this most interesting of expressions?

To put it in plain English, what the heck are you talking about mate? Posted Image


None of the above.


Then, as I said in the last statement of the previous comment, "What the heck are you talking about mate? Posted Image"

Modifié par Dwailing, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:54 .


#54674
Nightingale

Nightingale
  • Members
  • 756 messages

MegumiAzusa wrote...

Again some stuff:
Posted Image
this is how the Citadel looks in destroy
Posted Image
this is control
so now why is the beam active in destroy
Posted Image
but not in control
Posted Image

It's also interesting that in Control and Destroy for these pictures Earth is named, but in Synthesis it's not.

Than for the Coates stuff:
His videos are named:
End03_S_CoatesReb
End03_D_CoatesRebHi
End03_D_CoatesRebMin

The Reb could stand for Rebuild, but that would be inconsistent with other occurrences like End03_D_TutCT_TutRebuild where Rebuild is always a full word. Because of that, and we know he is dead on the Citadel it maybe should be something else? Like rebirth? Rebuild also wouldn't fit with the Min version as there is nothing rebuilt.


The beam being active in Destroy always confused me. Perhaps it's there for easy transportation from Earth onto the Citadel. Since the Relays are pretty much toast, they could have some of the soldiers and other races stay on the Citadel until they're completely rebuilt. I'd assume they'd move the Citadel back to where it originally was, though, once everything was put back together, which would make this obsolete.

Edit: By that I mean that it would take quite some time fixing the Citadel and reactivating the beam to work in the way they would want it to for this. In that time, surely they'd have made progress on the Relays. Obviously not enough to move the Citadel again, but enough that it would make having this beam useless....Also, they could just, you know, use their (somehow?) intact ships to simply fly there...:bandit:

You know, I'm getting nowhere talking circles around myself like this. Ignore me :whistle:

Modifié par DrTsoni, 28 juillet 2012 - 11:54 .


#54675
MegumiAzusa

MegumiAzusa
  • Members
  • 4 238 messages

byne wrote...

Megumi, I'm still trying to figure out what the **** I'm looking at in this picture:

Posted Image

I know you said it is named future city or something, but I dont see how that could possibly be a city.

Or relly anything else for that matter.

It's a flying City like the Citadel... just shaped like an Omni Blade :3