Ce sujet est fermé
They "stopped the reaper threat" supposedly. That's not equivilent to destroying them.RavenEyry wrote...
Because they defeated the reapers.SubAstris wrote...
How exactly did you get from "used Crucible" to "choosing destroy"?
RavenEyry wrote...
Because they defeated the reapers.SubAstris wrote...
How exactly did you get from "used Crucible" to "choosing destroy"?
True.RavenEyry wrote...
At least it thanks you for playing now instead of asking for more money.BansheeOwnage wrote...
Also, when I did refuse and the same pop-up message you get for all endings I was like OMGWTFBBQ? "Commander Shepard has become a legend by ending the reaper threat"? Orly? Could've sworn I just lost!
SubAstris wrote...
RavenEyry wrote...
Because they defeated the reapers.SubAstris wrote...
How exactly did you get from "used Crucible" to "choosing destroy"?
But that could equally apply to control, because you have "defeated" the Reapers by ending their threat and Shepard controlling them
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 29 juillet 2012 - 07:14 .
Threat's not ended permanantly. They're still there, ready to restart the cycle.SubAstris wrote...
But that could equally apply to control, because you have "defeated" the Reapers by ending their threat and Shepard controlling them
Literalist interpreation: Future cycle defeats reapers with either destroy, control, synthesis.RavenEyry wrote...
Threat's not ended permanantly. They're still there, ready to restart the cycle.SubAstris wrote...
But that could equally apply to control, because you have "defeated" the Reapers by ending their threat and Shepard controlling them
Or that scene is in Shepard's head, and therefore doesn't have to make any sense, like most of Shep's other hallucinations.Simon_Says wrote...
Literalist interpreation: Future cycle defeats reapers with either destroy, control, synthesis.RavenEyry wrote...
Threat's not ended permanantly. They're still there, ready to restart the cycle.SubAstris wrote...
But that could equally apply to control, because you have "defeated" the Reapers by ending their threat and Shepard controlling them
IT: Future cycle could destroy and thus defeat reapers. Or think they pick control/synth and think they defeated the reapers.
Please keep an open mind.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Read my more recent post. What advances did they make to help someone in 50000 years?Mister Mexican wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
They're clearly alien, but the idea that they could beat the reapers is a fallacy, and therefore makes no sense out of Shepard's head. That seems to be a recurring theme...Mister Mexican wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
A lot of differing opinion about refuse. We can't really say for sure. I think it was added to give players with low EMS and a saved collector base an option to break free. BleedingUranium suggested that refuse and destroy are akin to a standard paragon response and a charm response, respectively. So basically, if you pick refuse, you say pretty much the same thing, but with much less effect = maybe Shepard would die in refuse or something.Mister Mexican wrote...
I feel that Shepard does make it to the Crucible but from the moment TIM appears the Reapers are attempting to indoctrinate him. When Shep gets to the catalyst the star child is Harbinger taking the form of the child because Shep is sympathetic because he represents humanity that Shep couldn't save. If refusal is chosen the star child reveals its true form because Shep has rejected indoctrination. So (for me) refusal is the most logical or truest ending.
It seems to be the only option where Shepard still acts like Shep for me. I think he does die in refuse and the stargazers are a different type of alien rather than humans.
Could it not be that Shepard knew he would lose if he refused but that the advances they had made would help one of the next cycles to win.
RavenEyry wrote...
Threat's not ended permanantly. They're still there, ready to restart the cycle.SubAstris wrote...
But that could equally apply to control, because you have "defeated" the Reapers by ending their threat and Shepard controlling them
They're wrong. Dead reapers is how we win this!RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
I'm also open to many interpretations, but none of them include having some ugly supermutants and savages roaming my nuclear wasteland.RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.They'reHe's wrong. Dead reapers is how we win this!
I'm a bit lost here. The protheans built the crucible but were missing the catalyst (at least according to out favourite tampered-with VI). Information about a seperatist group wouldn't really help much either; they'd still be a seperatist group. Can't control the reapers. Finally, "They also could leave a record of how hard the final battle is."Mister Mexican wrote...
They managed to build the Crucible (whereas the Protheans just went around trying to destroy everything). Sure it said in the game that no-one had managed it before. Plus Liara knows about Cerberus attempting to control the Reapers (could be used in the next cycle to turn Reaper forces against themselves). They also could leave a record of how hard the final battle is.
It would be interesting to know which species the Reapers let live to start the next cycle.
estebanus wrote...
I'm also open to many interpretations, but none of them include having some ugly supermutants and savages roaming my nuclear wasteland.RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
Thanks, but I know the quote. I changed it because I was impying that "they" are the other interpretations which involve living reapers not being a threat. Soestebanus wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.They'reHe's wrong. Dead reapers is how we win this!
Fixed.
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 29 juillet 2012 - 07:31 .
Malcolm McDowell thinks he's really the president, kidnapped Estabanus and started posting with his account.MaximizedAction wrote...
Is...is that code for something?
MaximizedAction wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I'm also open to many interpretations, but none of them include having some ugly supermutants and savages roaming my nuclear wasteland.RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
Is...is that code for something?
How dare you insult the great president Eden! He's America's savior!RavenEyry wrote...
Malcolm McDowell thinks he's really the president, kidnapped Estabanus and started posting with his account.MaximizedAction wrote...
Is...is that code for something?
To us, of course. To the Stargazer?RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
No idea what you're on about here, but I know one thing for sure:estebanus wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I'm also open to many interpretations, but none of them include having some ugly supermutants and savages roaming my nuclear wasteland.RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
Is...is that code for something?
That sounds extremely unpatriotic of you. It's your duty to America and the enclave to destroy these savages and mutants!
All hail president Eden!
estebanus wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I'm also open to many interpretations, but none of them include having some ugly supermutants and savages roaming my nuclear wasteland.RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
Is...is that code for something?
That sounds extremely unpatriotic of you. It's your duty to America and the enclave to destroy these savages and mutants!
All hail president Eden!
Modifié par MaximizedAction, 29 juillet 2012 - 07:34 .
http://social.biowar...tegory/13/indexestebanus wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I'm also open to many interpretations, but none of them include having some ugly supermutants and savages roaming my nuclear wasteland.RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
Is...is that code for something?
That sounds extremely unpatriotic of you. It's your duty to America and the enclave to destroy these savages and mutants!
All hail president Eden!
Then I'm glad I've never been within 1000 miles of America.estebanus wrote...
How dare you insult the great president Eden! He's America's savior!
How can you not know President Eden? He's the savior of the wasteland! He has ascended every american in D.C. to a higher form of existence!BansheeOwnage wrote...
No idea what you're on about here, but I know one thing for sure:estebanus wrote...
MaximizedAction wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I'm also open to many interpretations, but none of them include having some ugly supermutants and savages roaming my nuclear wasteland.RavenEyry wrote...
I am open minded. I'm open to many different interpretations, but none of them include living reapers not being considered a threat.
Is...is that code for something?
That sounds extremely unpatriotic of you. It's your duty to America and the enclave to destroy these savages and mutants!
All hail president Eden!
It's nowhere near as entertaining as discussing your sexual ambiguity.
Retour en haut