Unschuld wrote...
A WITCH! A WITCH! A WITCH!! We have found a witch, may we burn her?
Yes please, it tickles
Unschuld wrote...
A WITCH! A WITCH! A WITCH!! We have found a witch, may we burn her?
dreamgazer wrote...
Lat2oo5 wrote...
http://social.biowar...ndex/10592642/1
I think it's worth taking a look if someone missed it out.
The fact that they've got that much going on in the catalyst's vocal registry really shouldn't be ignored.
dmay7 wrote...
Corik wrote...
bigstig wrote...
Corik wrote...
I don't fully understand the second reply from Jessica. Could any of you rewrite it with other words?
Interesting, the way I read it is:
There will be parts of the expansion that can be considered as post ending. i.e. The EC will include events after the choices.
However, the stargazer scene could be considered POST ending so it could just be an expansion of that.
I don't know who I hate more, Stargazer or Rieperbieber...
What kills me the most about Stargazer is that he says "many of the details got lost in time". Like WHICH details? Does that mean we are missing something (an ending?), or is the Mass Effect series just one of those games you played in first grade where you tell the student behind you a phrase and you get to the end and the last phrase is no where close to the original phrase.
your theory that the kid represents us is supported even more by the fact that the kid actually has shepard's body I like it a lotHellishFiend wrote...
dmay7 wrote...
Corik wrote...
bigstig wrote...
Corik wrote...
I don't fully understand the second reply from Jessica. Could any of you rewrite it with other words?
Interesting, the way I read it is:
There will be parts of the expansion that can be considered as post ending. i.e. The EC will include events after the choices.
However, the stargazer scene could be considered POST ending so it could just be an expansion of that.
I don't know who I hate more, Stargazer or Rieperbieber...
What kills me the most about Stargazer is that he says "many of the details got lost in time". Like WHICH details? Does that mean we are missing something (an ending?), or is the Mass Effect series just one of those games you played in first grade where you tell the student behind you a phrase and you get to the end and the last phrase is no where close to the original phrase.
See my thread for my opinion on the Stargazer scene.
MaximizedAction wrote...
dreamgazer wrote...
Lat2oo5 wrote...
http://social.biowar...ndex/10592642/1
I think it's worth taking a look if someone missed it out.
The fact that they've got that much going on in the catalyst's vocal registry really shouldn't be ignored.
yet...reading all these youtube comments after spending time on this thread...problematic.
yeah it is normally one of the things that people use to say bioware is lazy, but it always seemed odd to me as if they were really trying to reuse materials they could have gone with anybody, why shepard instead of for instance the child from the game himself? I think you've really got something thereHellishFiend wrote...
plfranke wrote...
your theory that the kid represents us is supported even more by the fact that the kid actually has shepard's body I like it a lotHellishFiend wrote...
See my thread for my opinion on the Stargazer scene.
He does?? Did not know that...
plfranke wrote...
yeah it is normally one of the things that people use to say bioware is lazy, but it always seemed odd to me as if they were really trying to reuse materials they could have gone with anybody, why shepard instead of for instance the child from the game himself? I think you've really got something thereHellishFiend wrote...
plfranke wrote...
your theory that the kid represents us is supported even more by the fact that the kid actually has shepard's body I like it a lotHellishFiend wrote...
See my thread for my opinion on the Stargazer scene.
He does?? Did not know that...
Yup. Just didn't read underneath the pic.balance5050 wrote...
Paxxton, learn to read, it says that zero is the O
Oh right, at least it's the body of an adult, the head is way too small for a child.MaximizedAction wrote...
plfranke wrote...
yeah it is normally one of the things that people use to say bioware is lazy, but it always seemed odd to me as if they were really trying to reuse materials they could have gone with anybody, why shepard instead of for instance the child from the game himself? I think you've really got something thereHellishFiend wrote...
plfranke wrote...
your theory that the kid represents us is supported even more by the fact that the kid actually has shepard's body I like it a lotHellishFiend wrote...
See my thread for my opinion on the Stargazer scene.
He does?? Did not know that...
Ok, call me stupid, but can one see that it's Shepard's body?
plfranke wrote...
yeah it is normally one of the things that people use to say bioware is lazy, but it always seemed odd to me as if they were really trying to reuse materials they could have gone with anybody, why shepard instead of for instance the child from the game himself? I think you've really got something thereHellishFiend wrote...
plfranke wrote...
your theory that the kid represents us is supported even more by the fact that the kid actually has shepard's body I like it a lotHellishFiend wrote...
See my thread for my opinion on the Stargazer scene.
He does?? Did not know that...
Look at the power they wield. Look at what they can do. Resurrect Shepard's mom.pirate1802 wrote...
Heh, I've almost always played as colonist Shepard, so when I played as Spacer and Hackett mentioned her mother, it was almost as if I was dropped in a different universe O_O
Modifié par paxxton, 30 mai 2012 - 06:04 .
MegumiAzusa wrote...
Oh right, at least it's the body of an adult, the head is way too small for a child.MaximizedAction wrote...
plfranke wrote...
yeah it is normally one of the things that people use to say bioware is lazy, but it always seemed odd to me as if they were really trying to reuse materials they could have gone with anybody, why shepard instead of for instance the child from the game himself? I think you've really got something thereHellishFiend wrote...
plfranke wrote...
your theory that the kid represents us is supported even more by the fact that the kid actually has shepard's body I like it a lotHellishFiend wrote...
See my thread for my opinion on the Stargazer scene.
He does?? Did not know that...
Ok, call me stupid, but can one see that it's Shepard's body?
Modifié par MaximizedAction, 30 mai 2012 - 06:04 .
It's logical. At the beginning there's order (or infinitesimal chaos). Then through the principle of enthropy chaos appears and grows. Then Reapers come, restore order and everything starts again.MegumiAzusa wrote...
Another point in the talk with the child:
"The created will always rebel against their creators. But we found a way to stop that from happening. A way to restore order for the next cycle."
Didn't every Reaper you've met say something like "You are chaos, we represent order." which has nothing to do with anything being wiped out?
Modifié par paxxton, 30 mai 2012 - 06:12 .
paxxton wrote...
It's logical. At the beginning there's order (or infinitesimal chaos). Then through the principle of enthropy chaos appears and grows.MegumiAzusa wrote...
Another point in the talk with the child:
"The created will always rebel against their creators. But we found a way to stop that from happening. A way to restore order for the next cycle."
Didn't every Reaper you've met say something like "You are chaos, we represent order." which has nothing to do with anything being wiped out?
I was talking figuratively.MaximizedAction wrote...
paxxton wrote...
It's logical. At the beginning there's order (or infinitesimal chaos). Then through the principle of enthropy chaos appears and grows.MegumiAzusa wrote...
Another point in the talk with the child:
"The created will always rebel against their creators. But we found a way to stop that from happening. A way to restore order for the next cycle."
Didn't every Reaper you've met say something like "You are chaos, we represent order." which has nothing to do with anything being wiped out?
By your analogy the Reapers reduce entropy, thus violating the second law of thermodynamics (assuming it's indeed a principle of nature and not a postulate). Hence, crime against nature (in the literal sense).
Modifié par paxxton, 30 mai 2012 - 06:25 .
paxxton wrote...
I was talking figuratively.MaximizedAction wrote...
paxxton wrote...
It's logical. At the beginning there's order (or infinitesimal chaos). Then through the principle of enthropy chaos appears and grows.MegumiAzusa wrote...
Another point in the talk with the child:
"The created will always rebel against their creators. But we found a way to stop that from happening. A way to restore order for the next cycle."
Didn't every Reaper you've met say something like "You are chaos, we represent order." which has nothing to do with anything being wiped out?
By your analogy the Reapers reduce entropy, thus violating the second law of thermodynamics (assuming it's indeed a principle of nature and not a postulate). Hence, crime against nature (in the literal sense).
I'm not saying anything against the logic behind it but how it's worded. It sounds like the ones that created the Reapers also created organics, then organics always at some point rebel against them so they created the Reapers to hold organics in check while not completely destroying organics.paxxton wrote...
It's logical. At the beginning there's order (or infinitesimal chaos). Then through the principle of enthropy chaos appears and grows. Then Reapers come, restore order and everything starts again.MegumiAzusa wrote...
Another point in the talk with the child:
"The created will always rebel against their creators. But we found a way to stop that from happening. A way to restore order for the next cycle."
Didn't every Reaper you've met say something like "You are chaos, we represent order." which has nothing to do with anything being wiped out?
Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 30 mai 2012 - 06:26 .