BleedingUranium wrote...
Starbuck8 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
Starbuck8 wrote...
BleedingUranium wrote...
If anyone wants to be, umm, entertained, check this out
http://masseffect.wi...rybody_Shut_Up.The Milkman wrote...
Seriously, stop saying this is true beyond any shadow of a doubt.ALL of the evidence in favour of the IT is circumstantial.
Lol really? I don't think I've ever seen an ITer say that IT is true beyond a shadow of a doubt. We generally are careful to qualify our statements as speculation, our "proof" as possibilities or clues.
That and he says there's a lot of counter evidence, but I have yet to see something other than "Bioware is lazy/sucks at writing". I mean, I kind of want to see something, just for the novelty of it
Ugh, I know, sorry if I refuse to believe that BioWare is that bad, and choose to give them the benefit of the doubt until EC is released.
Honestly the only counter-IT I've been able to think of myself would be a few times in the game it felt to me like it was ever-so-slightly foreshadowing the 3-choice ending in a literalist way. Even if it was, still doesn't preclude IT imo.
Well, Vendetta kind of foreshadowed Starbinger, but I don't believe anything Vendetta says, other than Kai Leng is indoctrinated
Mostly because they found a Prothean Beacon which is completely unrelated to a Prothean VI. It was made very clear in ME1 what both of those were and how they worked. They have nothing in common.
Shepard never actually used the Beacon!
Also how did the Protheans reach the conclusion that the Reapers were a part fo the cycle, but not the creators fo it? Liara in ME1 specifically adresses how hard it is to find anything on prevuis cycles, saying we know little of the Protheand and practically nothing of those before.
How did the Protheans, if vendetta speaks the truth, reach this conclusion?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




