CanadianGunshy wrote...
On my first playthrough - when I was presented by the choices, I couldn't decide what to do. Eventually the game ended with a critical mission failure saying "The crucible has been destroyed" and I had to start over again.
Synthesis imo was the worst of the choices, basically sacrificing all sentient life to become "tiny reaper-like beings". Control was very much alike the choice to rewrite the Geth in ME2. And Destroy was genocide, not only to the Reapers - but also to EDI and the Geth.
In ME2 I chose to destroy rather then rewrite. I considered it (ironically) to be the lesser of two evils. In ME3 I found if only the reapers were affected, I would have done the same. However EDI and the Geth were a part of that choice. For some reason I consider controlling the reapers the lesser of two evils then sacrificing a allies that trusted me to do the "right" thing. Thus I was paralyzed with indecision at the final moments of the game.
What I don't follow is how Control = Indoctrination.
If Shepard is choosing it not to control the Reapers, but to save lives (synthetic as they may be) instead. He is essentially rejecting the starchild's (as well as the reapers) reasons.
Maybe someone can clear this up?
Because so far the only reasons I've heard that control is indoctrination is because TIM wanted it and his eyes are blue when he is being evaporated by a blue beam.
You can think of it this way;
Saren wanted
Synthesis, he believed he could form a pact between machines and organics, the strengths of both, the weaknesses of neither, all organics everywhere would be improved and saved by him, "I will save more lives than have ever existed." Sound familiar?
Control was The Illusive Man's own philosophy, he possessed the arrogance to believe he could control a being with a mind beyond anything he would even be capable of comprehending, something so vast as to give even the Geth Consensus a feeling of awe being touched by it.
Synthesis appeals to Shepard's heroism, he falls for the same trap Saren did, trying to be the hero, trying to save everyone, and in the end saving no one, becase he chose to do so by way of the Reaper philosophy. Because that is precisely what it is, accepting that the Reapers are a necessity and that things must be done their way,
Control and
Destroy on the other hand are more opposed to one another.
Control is giving in.
Control is what trapped The Illusive Man, he belived he could
Control his controllers. "You will lose everything you have." The Guardian explicitly tells Shepard this, he will lose everything if he choses
Control, he even has it pointed out to him that by choosing
Control, he is surrendering his body, to whom or what, the Guardian has no words to say.
Control is accepting the idea that the Reapers exist, and that allowing them to continue to exist would benefit you, Shepard is betraying his principles in the name of power, just as The Illusive Man did.
Destroy is standing by a diamond hard core of mental anathema. At the Crucible choice, you aren't summoned there to create anything or
Control anyone. You are summoned there to reject the Reapers, to push them out of the gates of your mind. Destroy is the choice that has to be made, even with consequences, because Shepard himself knows that this is a war, and that means that not necessarily everyone will survive. "Victory through Sacrifice" is one of the themes.
Modifié par Arian Dynas, 07 juin 2012 - 11:03 .