Makrys wrote...
Guys, entire DLCs for ME2 were crafted in the time its taking them to make the EC. And those DLCs obviously had gameplay. OF COURSE the EC will be big. It will not just be cutscenes. Seriously, it don't take no 3 or more months to do a few cutscenes. Gamble himself said at PAX that it will be a considerable amount.
Take hope my friends. Don't get your hopes up, per se. But be hopeful. You have a reason to be. The EC will be awesome. I know it. And it will be somewhat lengthy. Trust me.
Kasumi's DLC was the first post release DLC for ME2 and it was released just 2 1/2 months after ME2's launch.
Overlord was the next, and followed just 2 months later. Once again, it does not take 3 to 4 months (assuming they started beginning of April as Gamble said, and finish at the end of july) to make some cutscenes. For God's sake, that is LONGER than the previous ME2 DLC I just talked about! So, rest assured, the EC will be plentiful. I gaurantee you.
Also, just for another point of reference, LOTSB, ME2's lengthiest and meatiest DLC took around 2 1/2 months to develop as well. So, be encouraged.
EDIT: Also, finally caught up from yesterday! After like 15 pages... *strained eyes*
Reposting after edit.
EDIT: TOPS! Good, people need to see this and be encouraged. Whether or not the IT is true (it is, don't worry), the EC will be substantial. So, that is definitely a good thing. If they were going to explain the BS that is the ending, it would have to be lengthy.
But I'm fairly sure we are instead getting a 'real'/extended ending revealing IT and what happens next. The strongest evidence in my mind that I'm always reminded of? The growls at the beginning of the game when Anderson interrupts Shepard talking to the child. And then the child just vanishes. Sorry, but that SCREAMS hallucinations, and the Reaper 'growls' are a direct reference from one of the novels which you all know explained them happening when a Reaper could not maintain control over a victim's mind.
That has always been one of the strongest pieces of evidence in my mind, and I have never heard someone realistically dispute it, or explain it without IT. It's seemingly obvious.
Modifié par Makrys, 14 juin 2012 - 05:07 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





