HellishFiend wrote...
Arashi08 wrote...
Ok, Seriously, calm down and take a deep breath. I am NOT your enemy here! It was ME who came up with this NOT them, and I brought it up to strengthen IT's argument, not to mention I wanted to get an answer from people who would NOT flip out over it.
This is why I was hesitant about bringing it up...
I realize that now, and I apologize for overreacting in your direction... I put long hours into that vid and I think it drained me a bit more than I realized at first.
Here is a modified version of my original post:
If that's the best they can do, they might as well give up now.
That "hole" is entirely circumstantial and ultimately baseless.
It relies on a conclusion based on a misinterpretation of the wording used in the final hours app.
They would be labeling themselves as hypocrites and dismissing their own case in one fell swoop.
Theyre trying to shoot the evidence down by using circumstantial evidence based on a misinterpretation.They accuse us of employing circumstantial evidence that, while circumstantial, is based entirely on precedent, lore, and context.
Theyre trying to shoot down a strong piece of evidence by using a weaker version of that same type of evidence that is based on a misinterpretation.
I was very careful to be neutral and open minded in the wording in my video, but if theyre going to try to shoot it down with that, you can safely assume they arent putting enough thought into it to justify conversing with them.
Ya I gathered that you put alot ofwork into that video, and it shows. It was well thought out, well put together, and enjoyable, not to mention it gave me a great deal of hope for IT.
The Final Hours app just happened to cross my mind and I wanted to see what the counterpoint would be if someone were to bring it up. it is circumstantial of course and we don't know for sure what really happened during ME3's development and what they dropped or didn't drop. to be fair, I didn't entirely understand the story behind the Final Hours app controversy, so the point may have been moot, but it was something I was thinking about, since I try to be objective and think of counter arguments and see if the evidence can stand.
Still, I, a supporter for IT, thought of this baseless and circumstantial "hole" before the anti-ITers and trolls did, so maybe that is an even greater testament to how much thought they put into these things lol