WolfyZA wrote...
Last Night I was browsing on Youtube looking at The IT forthe billionth time when I cam across this "beings of light theory" WTF?!?!?! Had to be the biggest hunk of junk i've ever seen... Sore the ME1 Lore mentions it but the guy failed to explain why Shepard still lived in the Destroy ending.. The noob.
It makes me lol that the literalists think Klencory supports their side. Attention literalists: The reason that sounds like what Shepard sees is because pudgy little bastard was indoctrinated.
Duh.snfonseka wrote...
But the important question is, will BW embrace the IT?
Warning: Witcher 2 spoilers to follow. Do not read if you haven't played it yet but intend to.I would imagine so since that was their intent to begin with. And I must comment on your sig. Witcher 2, where your choices matter. How is it then that things work out pretty much the same no matter what? You fight Saskia in the end regardless of drastically different relationships to her, the Romans always invade, the Order of the Flaming Hitlers always goes Vlad the Impaler with an unhealthy side helping of rape, Triss is fine even if you totally abandon her... The few choices you do get are almost certainly purely cosmetic because things like Henselt's life or who rules the Pontar means almost nothing when the Rom--sorry, the "Nilfgaardians" are swarming like darkspawn during a blight. Don't believe me? Ask yourself how much the choice to save Princess Adda in Witcher 2 mattered when a major part of the next game was the Temerian nobility bickering over who gets the throne that would default to her without question if the story was written on the guarantee she be alive. Instead they just handwave her entire existence. She doesn't even appear with King Douchebag of Redania.
Don't get me wrong. Witcher 2 was an excellent game, as was 1. But don't tell me our choices actually make a difference there and not in ME. That's crap.
End spoilers.FellishBeast wrote...
I am wondering if anyone has any thoughts about the conversation with the Reaper on Rannoch, because what it says matches up with what Starbinger says at the end of the game. I think we can be pretty sure that Rannoch was not a hallucination, so does that mean that Reaper was lying and planting the idea into Shepard's mind for later, or was what it said true?
I hope what I'm saying makes sense; I'm about to go to sleep x]
There's a weird screen pulse effect seen only there that's got no good (legitimate) reason for being there. The Reaper also talked about synthetics and organics not being able to co-exist while Tali and Legion stand by and don't say a word. Tali and Legion don't have anything to add to that topic? I call shenanigans. No, we definitely cannot be pretty sure the Rannoch conversation wasn't in Shepard's head.
MaximizedAction wrote...
that's youalreadytoldmethat-shadowing.
Have I ever told you I was born in London?
TSA_383 wrote...
Does it have to be 100% one way or the other?
The way I see it, Cronos probably happened in some form, but by that point your grip on reality is collapsing fast, and so everything you see should be taken with a pinch of salt...
'course not. Personally I'm not a fan of the "waking nightmare" theory but it's certainly a valid one.
ivenoidea wrote...
Holy ****. There i go on holidays once and this thread grows from 750 to 946.
I know it's a lot to ask but was there anything major that happened in the last week?
Nothing major. HellishFiend became a legend by ending the literalist threat.
... Did you know I was born in London?
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
Then I would have to check for Harbinger under my bed everytime I go to sleep.
