Capeo wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
Capeo wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
MegaSovereign wrote...
And I think you're jumping to conclusions yourself. So stop being a downer
Funny statement considering IT is based on jumping to conclusions.
So is a literal view. We just don't know what is in the EC. So stop jumping to conclusions. We don't have enough data that goes either way.
Haha. No data? No, just repeated statements by the developers that the aren't changing the endings. Oh, and Walters just confirming it plainly in the podcast once again. That's actual data. How many times must they say they aren't changing the endings before people realize... they're not changing the endings.
IT doesn't change the endings. If you think it does, you fundamentally don't understand or comprehend IT.
Oh good God, this argument. I've heard it a million times before. I'm not arguing it again. It's ridiculous.
I'm at work, got photoshop in front of me, downloaded the pic of the Quarian and Geth labeled as image from an epilogue, zoomed in: lo and behold the geth has a shining green eye. That's an epilogue. After the end. Literal Synthesis as shown in the existing ending. No IT.
? Lol




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




