El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...
Nah...
Omnisexual is the right word, if it has a hole... Go in!
Should I start calling you Captian Jack? (Doctor Who/Torchwood refference for anyone reading who is unfamiliar with those shows.)
El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...
Nah...
Omnisexual is the right word, if it has a hole... Go in!
CrystalCircuit wrote...
Vorcha
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Sheep, furniture, cows, trees, birds, cars, corpses, abstract concepts (why limit myself)...I'm open to possiblities.
...
...
But seriously...NO.
The only "alien" I'd ever possibly consider even for a nano-second are Eldar. But they are basicly elves in space, so nto relly aline anywhoo.
Modifié par Sgt Stryker, 15 mai 2012 - 07:44 .
KDD-0063 wrote...
You can't call yourself Xenosexual if the partner is so near human in looks.
Let's see how well you do ... with a hanar.
Here is the thing about non human genitalia. YOU ARE NOT DESIGNED FOR IT! You're trying to insert an american plug into a european socket. It's just not going to work. Unless they do it like Asari, but they are a special case. Also I am actually curious if this is how most of the native species on Thessia mate in such a way and if the entire planet is monogendered. That would mean the Thessian equivalent of a dog would mate like an asari, implications squicky.Maria Caliban wrote...
I'm open to any sufficiently humanoid species.
Modifié par Harbinger of your Destiny, 15 mai 2012 - 08:18 .
Bestiality is with lower animals. You'd have to regard life with intelligence around the level of humans in very low esteem (namely being bigoted and prejudiced against them) to define it as bestiality or zoophilia. Xenosexuality is the most appropriate (or at least eloquent) term on the table right now.Seboist wrote...
Nope, I'm not into bestiality.
Modifié par Blacklash93, 15 mai 2012 - 08:26 .
Great. Fine reading for those of us with a wicked spider phobia. Not cool!Zolt51 wrote...
You do know that the whole thing about Tali's face is a hoax, right? Mike Gamble has confimed that all Quarians were in fact just suits full of spiders.
...niiiiice! It's his ass isn't it.Blacklash93 wrote...
Strong, elegantly-designed
robots whose bodies shine like a knight in glistening armor ready
to sweep you off your feet... With those serene, synthesized voices that
send chills of wonder and excitement down your spine... And a
beautiful thought processing unit that can conclude solely by logic that
you're the only one for them... Damn, did I just write that? Stupid
sexy Legion...
Modifié par Dont Kaidan Me, 15 mai 2012 - 08:20 .
Dont Kaidan Me wrote...
Great. Fine reading for those of us with a wicked spider phobia. Not cool!Zolt51 wrote...
You do know that the whole thing about Tali's face is a hoax, right? Mike Gamble has confimed that all Quarians were in fact just suits full of spiders.
My faith in humanity is so degraded, I might just run full speed to the first species available. Although any species that can elicit hallucinatory responses is at the top of the list.
And what if that whole is a food procesor basically? Or what if that pipe is covered in spines like a cat? Lovemaking would not be called lovemaking it would be called Dialing911.El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...
Nah...
Omnisexual is the right word, if it has a hole... Go in!
Or elcor.KDD-0063 wrote...
You can't call yourself Xenosexual if the partner is so near human in looks.
Let's see how well you do ... with a hanar.
Guest_simfamUP_*
Modifié par Shajar, 15 mai 2012 - 09:24 .
Pinkflu wrote...
If humanity ever encounters another sapient species of approximately equal intelligence to ourselves, it's inevitable that there will be cross-species relationships.
The 'bestiality/zoophilia' argument wouldn't apply in a Turian/Human relationship any more than it applies to a same sex relationship, despite the argument often being used by anti-gay marriage campaigners. The argument is based on a prejudiced, gut reaction analogy of 'it's wrong', without exploring why bestiality is wrong.
Bestiality is wrong because of issues of consent - animals lack our intelligence. They don't have the intellectual maturity to give reliable consent. This is why nations have the legal age of consent; to protect children, as they are not yet mature enough to give proper consent.
With that in mind, sexual contact with another species would not be immoral in any way, provided that the individual of the species in question is a grown adult and intelligent enough to give reliable consent.
Of course, whether 'cross-species liaisons ', as Garrus puts it, become commonplace is another matter entirely. It would depend on how physically similar to us this species is, as we as humans have evolved to be sexually attracted solely to other humans, after all.
Matt Rhodes talks about this issue in designing the Asari, at 1 minute in to this video:
Modifié par Zkyire, 15 mai 2012 - 09:29 .
Playing D&D in high school ensures that inter-species sexual liasons are the only ones you get.Zaxares wrote...
Playing D&D since childhood meant that I was already well-schooled in the beauty and delight of inter-species sexual liaisons.
Guest_simfamUP_*
Zkyire wrote...
Pinkflu wrote...
If humanity ever encounters another sapient species of approximately equal intelligence to ourselves, it's inevitable that there will be cross-species relationships.
The 'bestiality/zoophilia' argument wouldn't apply in a Turian/Human relationship any more than it applies to a same sex relationship, despite the argument often being used by anti-gay marriage campaigners. The argument is based on a prejudiced, gut reaction analogy of 'it's wrong', without exploring why bestiality is wrong.
Bestiality is wrong because of issues of consent - animals lack our intelligence. They don't have the intellectual maturity to give reliable consent. This is why nations have the legal age of consent; to protect children, as they are not yet mature enough to give proper consent.
With that in mind, sexual contact with another species would not be immoral in any way, provided that the individual of the species in question is a grown adult and intelligent enough to give reliable consent.
Of course, whether 'cross-species liaisons ', as Garrus puts it, become commonplace is another matter entirely. It would depend on how physically similar to us this species is, as we as humans have evolved to be sexually attracted solely to other humans, after all.
Matt Rhodes talks about this issue in designing the Asari, at 1 minute in to this video:
Consent is the only problem to you?
So if your neighbour's dog had a human intellect.. you'd be up for ****ing it?
..wow.
Guest_simfamUP_*
Lee T wrote...
As a human nope. As a player, definitely as the human squadmates were way too boring for me.