464 réponses à ce sujet

[sAxMoNkI]

Pottumuusi wrote...

Oransel wrote...

sAxMoNkI wrote...

Miranda wants the best for humanity, if you listen to her throughout ME2 however she actually tones her more extreme views down regarding human dominance after spending time with Shepard.

You are a WHOLE different kettle of fish, the closest I can say is that you are a xeno-speciesist with overtones of fascist dictator thrown in.

It's sad you think this way. I want the best for Humanity as well and I am not extremist to the point of cold war with other species or something. You are overreacting about fiction/hypothesis.

Yeah, you're a reasonable guy and you draw the line at the total domination and subjugation of other species.

+1

[mauro2222]

...ok, what's next? The space hamster is an abomination 'cause the little thing is from space?

[AtlasMickey]

[Oransel]

mauro2222 wrote...

...ok, what's next? The space hamster is an abomination 'cause the little thing is from space?

I bought only Earth fish for my aquarium in ME2. What a discrimination!

[Pottumuusi]

Oransel wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

You are a terrible person. 

I'll take that as a compliment. I would not be surprised if you are anti-religion too, depending on your stance of creationalism. Who is more authoritan of us? Hmm...

Hmm indeed. Lets see. You apparently support the subjugation of sentient beings and I do not. I believe that everyone should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.


As for religion, I wouldn't say that I'm anti-religion. I don't give a **** what other people believe in the privacy of their own homes as long as they do the same for me. Creationists on the other hand I do have a problem with, since they often try to pretty much destroy everything good in the world by trying to force their three thousand year old mythology to be taugh as fact in schools.

[legion999]

mauro2222 wrote...

...ok, what's next? The space hamster is an abomination 'cause the little thing is from space?

Krogan, Geth and now EDI. I say the Volus.

[sAxMoNkI]

Pottumuusi wrote...

Oransel wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

You are a terrible person. 

I'll take that as a compliment. I would not be surprised if you are anti-religion too, depending on your stance of creationalism. Who is more authoritan of us? Hmm...

Hmm indeed. Lets see. You apparently support the subjugation of sentient beings and I do not. I believe that everyone should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.


As for religion, I wouldn't say that I'm anti-religion. I don't give a **** what other people believe in the privacy of their own homes as long as they do the same for me. Creationists on the other hand I do have a problem with, since they often try to pretty much destroy everything good in the world by trying to force their three thousand year old mythology to be taugh as fact in schools.

Make that another +1, Pottumuusi I think I may owe you a beer.

[Hadeedak]

All the abominating, shiny and trying to tell jokes.

[Lyrebon]

Pottumuusi wrote...

Oransel wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

You are a terrible person. 

I'll take that as a compliment. I would not be surprised if you are anti-religion too, depending on your stance of creationalism. Who is more authoritan of us? Hmm...

Hmm indeed. Lets see. You apparently support the subjugation of sentient beings and I do not. I believe that everyone should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.


As for religion, I wouldn't say that I'm anti-religion. I don't give a **** what other people believe in the privacy of their own homes as long as they do the same for me. Creationists on the other hand I do have a problem with, since they often try to pretty much destroy everything good in the world by trying to force their three thousand year old mythology to be taugh as fact in schools.

This is the problem I have with any religion. If you want to believe in it you have to have faith in an object that can't be proven to exist or not exist - it's intangible. And I'm not willing to subjugate myself to a supreme being that's as flawed as his creations.

Plus, if there was a god, does he not want us to believe in him in our own way, not the way of man? If I were to praise a god it doesn't mean I have to subscribe to Christianity, because that god is not the god I can envision (jealous, petty and homicidial).

By the way, I'm agnostic, I believe in the obervable.

[M Hedonist]

This thread was better when it was about Spiderman.

Taboo-XX wrote...

Oransel wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

I'm a leftist. Please enlighten me on how much you know about politics. I would love to talk with you about this.

Also you think that Avatar and Planet of the Apes are leftist films?

Do you understand that leftists hate liberals?

Do you know that Socialists and Communists are different?

Liberals
are moderate lefties. Socialists are less moderate, but tolerable.
Communists are extremists to the point of losing almost all connections
with liberals. Same with Right-wing. Conservatives are moderate while
fascists are extremists and should not be associated with conservatives
as there are too many differences and oddly, communists and
naz*s/fascists are much closer to each other than to their respective
moderate counterparts. I am hardcore Conservative and a Republican.

That is... accurate.

[Oransel]

Pottumuusi wrote...

Hmm indeed. Lets see. You apparently support the subjugation of sentient beings and I do not. I believe that everyone should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.

Who was talking about slavery? Dominance is about being above, being better, being strongest. It is not about taking freedom away from aliens.

Pottumuusi wrote...

As for religion, I wouldn't say that I'm anti-religion. I don't give a **** what other people believe in the privacy of their own homes as long as they do the same for me. Creationists on the other hand I do have a problem with, since they often try to pretty much destroy everything good in the world by trying to force their three thousand year old mythology to be taugh as fact in schools.

Your argument is invalid. Evolution is not a fact. Neither creationalism was proved false. Best solution would be to teach both theories, but, no, anti-creationists are always right, yeah, I see.

[Lyrebon]

Sauruz wrote...

This thread was better when it was about Spiderman.

[M Hedonist]

Seriously Oransel, why are you still around? Didn't multiple people already tell you to get help?

[Lyrebon]

Oransel wrote...

Who was talking about slavery? Dominance is about being above, being better, being strongest. It is not about taking freedom away from aliens.

It's arrogant to assume we're better than other intelligent lifeforms.

Oransel wrote...

Your argument is invalid. Evolution is not a fact. Neither creationalism was proved false. Best solution would be to teach both theories, but, no, anti-creationists are always right, yeah, I see.

This I can agree with.

[M Hedonist]

Oransel wrote...

Your argument is invalid. Evolution is not a fact. Neither creationalism was proved false. Best solution would be to teach both theories, but, no, anti-creationists are always right, yeah, I see.

Can you disprove the theory that the flying Spaghetti monster created life? No? Then it has to be taught in schools.
I'm happy to live in Europe where creationalism gets the 'respect' it deserves. Hint: It's none at all.

Edit: It's 'creationism' btw.

Modifié par Sauruz, 15 mai 2012 - 08:07 .

[legion999]

Oransel wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

Hmm indeed. Lets see. You apparently support the subjugation of sentient beings and I do not. I believe that everyone should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.

Who was talking about slavery? Dominance is about being above, being better, being strongest. It is not about taking freedom away from aliens.

Pottumuusi wrote...

As for religion, I wouldn't say that I'm anti-religion. I don't give a **** what other people believe in the privacy of their own homes as long as they do the same for me. Creationists on the other hand I do have a problem with, since they often try to pretty much destroy everything good in the world by trying to force their three thousand year old mythology to be taugh as fact in schools.

Your argument is invalid. Evolution is not a fact. Neither creationalism was proved false. Best solution would be to teach both theories, but, no, anti-creationists are always right, yeah, I see.

As a religious person I disagree with this. The evidence we have now points to evolution being fact if not highly likely unlike creationism whose arguement is destroyed by archaeology.

Unless you mean teaching Creationism in Religious Studies in which case I agree.

Modifié par legion999, 15 mai 2012 - 08:07 .

[Pottumuusi]

Oransel wrote...

Your argument is invalid. Evolution is not a fact. Neither creationalism was proved false. Best solution would be to teach both theories, but, no, anti-creationists are always right, yeah, I see.

Some nice assertions you got there.

[sAxMoNkI]

Oransel wrote...

Pottumuusi wrote...

Hmm indeed. Lets see. You apparently support the subjugation of sentient beings and I do not. I believe that everyone should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.

Who was talking about slavery? Dominance is about being above, being better, being strongest. It is not about taking freedom away from aliens.

Pottumuusi wrote...

As for religion, I wouldn't say that I'm anti-religion. I don't give a **** what other people believe in the privacy of their own homes as long as they do the same for me. Creationists on the other hand I do have a problem with, since they often try to pretty much destroy everything good in the world by trying to force their three thousand year old mythology to be taugh as fact in schools.

Your argument is invalid. Evolution is not a fact. Neither creationalism was proved false. Best solution would be to teach both theories, but, no, anti-creationists are always right, yeah, I see.

Both theories are already taught genius, Creationism (that's how you spell it by the way just so you don't continue to look stupid, creationalism isn't a thing) is taught in Religious studies because it is a religious explanation. Evolution is taught in Science because it is a scientific theory. From my experience it is in fact a small sect of creationists trying to get the *ahem* "heretical" theories of Darwin banned from schools so that Creationism can be taught as the only explaination. So don't try and pull the "people that believe in evolution want religion abolished" argument.

Modifié par sAxMoNkI, 15 mai 2012 - 08:06 .

[Oransel]

Sauruz wrote...

 Then it has to be taught in schools.
I'm happy to live in Europe where creationalism gets the 'respect' it deserves. Hint: It's none at all.

You are hurting religious feelings. That is punishable, unlike being anti-alien. Check your words.

[Hadeedak]

This is the face of evil.



FOR SCIENCE.

[Taboo]

Pottumuusi wrote...

Oransel wrote...

Your argument is invalid. Evolution is not a fact. Neither creationalism was proved false. Best solution would be to teach both theories, but, no, anti-creationists are always right, yeah, I see.

Some nice assertions you got there.

[incinerator950]

Hadeedak wrote...

This is the face of evil.



FOR SCIENCE.

[Lyrebon]

Oransel wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

 Then it has to be taught in schools.
I'm happy to live in Europe where creationalism gets the 'respect' it deserves. Hint: It's none at all.

You are hurting religious feelings. That is punishable, unlike being anti-alien. Check your words.

Punishable by what? Stoning?

Calling someone names and hurting their feelings isn't a criminal offense. In some cases it's honesty. People that shove religion in my face are f****** morons. Oops, I should watch myself, I insulted a group of people that believe in something unproven and man-made.

Damn, I did it again! SMITE ME, OH MIGHTY SMITER!!!

Modifié par Lyrebon, 15 mai 2012 - 08:14 .

[Lyrebon]

incinerator950 wrote...

For the future of three-boobed girls, I believe in science!

[M Hedonist]

Oransel wrote...

Sauruz wrote...

 Then it has to be taught in schools.
I'm happy to live in Europe where creationalism gets the 'respect' it deserves. Hint: It's none at all.

You are hurting religious feelings. That is punishable, unlike being anti-alien. Check your words.

No seriously, can you disprove FSM?