Indoctrination Documentary - Part 2?
#251
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 12:18
#252
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 12:42
estebanus wrote...
Nice! Could you provide me with a link to it?
#253
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 12:45
#254
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 12:51
Ownaholic wrote...
IT IS DONE!
I have been working on it non-stop for 15 and 1/2 hours straight. Time to render and then upload!
Awesome! Can't wait to see it! Preparing popcorn!
#255
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 01:33
IronSabbath88 wrote...
For me, you touched on the one thing that I feel is the best evidence possible for IT and that's the gunshot wound that the camera purposely makes a huge deal of.
That to me is the most solid thing going for the IT, but if people want it, I say go for it... I don't think it's necessary though.
I just don't get the gunwound thing you're throwing around.. the marauder also known as "Marauder Shields" to IT peopel shot shepard, and the medigel dispenser systems were broken, his suit didn't automaticaly seal the wound and he/she couldn't apply a larget dose because all the medical gear was busted...
Shepard limps wounded all the way from the beam and over to where they meet TIM.. still wounded.. Still no medigel or other firstaid options...
Why does it come as such a surprise that shepard is still wounded with a rifle shot after shooting Anderson?
So it goes from Shepard is wounded by marauder => Shepard is wounded it's a miracle and must have a psychological explanation and be proof that it's all a dream?
Why are most so called Proofs in the IT explained using extremely complicated explanations and concepts (for no reason) when there are simple explanations?
It's not a mystery or a secret that the Marauder in front of the beam shot shepard, he always does that, it can't be avoided. And then after a while that gun wound becommes a miraculous proof that shepard is dreaming or something... Seriously?
Some people here called it the most convincing piece of proof in the IT and I find it farfetched.... The theoretical approach behind the theory seems to be to look for proof that you might get a replay of the entire end of the game with a real ending.
To this end you come up with incredibly complex explanations to make it all a dream and twist things til it makes no sense.
You are looking for an explanation that feels good and serves your goal instead of looking at what's the most reasonable explanation and if it's reasonable to interpret that much value into a piece of proof that defies further examination.
I don't like the current ending and changing it and improving it to the level of excellence we had on Tuchanka would have been lovely but I don't want to get into selfdelusions that tells me I will get it, when the theory representing it looks like something written by a UFO conspiracy theorist. I'm trying my best to use civil words here.
Sometimes I wonder, do you people really belive in this stuff or are you just hoping BW will fix the ending?
To me it looks like the product of similar creative works as those found below... All I ever get is insults or comments that it can't be compared to religion. Though noone has ever told me "why not?"

Some times I get comments like, we arn't studdying religion, were studdying a work fiction and using reason and debating the clues. We make assumptions then if we like it we go with it and then we got a fact.
Therefor Assumption + assumption + more assumptions = added facts = truth.
What really anoys me is people running all over claiming IT is some kind of truth, hopefully most of the air will have gone out of the IT in a few days. Unfortunately the ending will probably dissapoint me but hopefully it's a lot better than what we had on release. Least it might look like they put some effort into it.
#256
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 01:35
#257
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 01:57
shodiswe wrote...
I have to admit all these theories are still entertaining thoughI just wish some people didn't get so over zealous about them.
Im gonna watch cos they are fun, not cos I believe it.
I do want the EC to clarify it tru or not tho.
Modifié par StElmo, 23 juin 2012 - 01:57 .
#258
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 02:11
Angelo2027 wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Nice! Could you provide me with a link to it?
#259
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 02:47
shodiswe wrote...
IronSabbath88 wrote...
For me, you touched on the one thing that I feel is the best evidence possible for IT and that's the gunshot wound that the camera purposely makes a huge deal of.
That to me is the most solid thing going for the IT, but if people want it, I say go for it... I don't think it's necessary though.
I just don't get the gunwound thing you're throwing around.. the marauder also known as "Marauder Shields" to IT peopel shot shepard, and the medigel dispenser systems were broken, his suit didn't automaticaly seal the wound and he/she couldn't apply a larget dose because all the medical gear was busted...
Shepard limps wounded all the way from the beam and over to where they meet TIM.. still wounded.. Still no medigel or other firstaid options...
Why does it come as such a surprise that shepard is still wounded with a rifle shot after shooting Anderson?
So it goes from Shepard is wounded by marauder => Shepard is wounded it's a miracle and must have a psychological explanation and be proof that it's all a dream?![]()
Why are most so called Proofs in the IT explained using extremely complicated explanations and concepts (for no reason) when there are simple explanations?
It's not a mystery or a secret that the Marauder in front of the beam shot shepard, he always does that, it can't be avoided. And then after a while that gun wound becommes a miraculous proof that shepard is dreaming or something... Seriously?
Some people here called it the most convincing piece of proof in the IT and I find it farfetched.... The theoretical approach behind the theory seems to be to look for proof that you might get a replay of the entire end of the game with a real ending.
To this end you come up with incredibly complex explanations to make it all a dream and twist things til it makes no sense.
You are looking for an explanation that feels good and serves your goal instead of looking at what's the most reasonable explanation and if it's reasonable to interpret that much value into a piece of proof that defies further examination.
I don't like the current ending and changing it and improving it to the level of excellence we had on Tuchanka would have been lovely but I don't want to get into selfdelusions that tells me I will get it, when the theory representing it looks like something written by a UFO conspiracy theorist. I'm trying my best to use civil words here.
Sometimes I wonder, do you people really belive in this stuff or are you just hoping BW will fix the ending?
To me it looks like the product of similar creative works as those found below... All I ever get is insults or comments that it can't be compared to religion. Though noone has ever told me "why not?"
Some times I get comments like, we arn't studdying religion, were studdying a work fiction and using reason and debating the clues. We make assumptions then if we like it we go with it and then we got a fact.
Therefor Assumption + assumption + more assumptions = added facts = truth.
What really anoys me is people running all over claiming IT is some kind of truth, hopefully most of the air will have gone out of the IT in a few days. Unfortunately the ending will probably dissapoint me but hopefully it's a lot better than what we had on release. Least it might look like they put some effort into it.
You're thinking of the wrong gunshot wound. The marauder shot him in the shoulder, but the wound that the camera focuses on is Shepard's wound on his left abdomen. That's where Shepard shot Anderson. Shepard was never shot on his left abdomen. I believe it's supposed to represent Shepard succombing to the Reaper's indoctrination.
Anyways, the one piece of evidence that makes me still have strong hope for IT is the piece that Ownaholic mentions in his original video at about the 59 minute mark. The fact that theres a file called "Dream foliage" and the foliage in it is from the planet where the Normandy crashes. Can anyone provide a link to that piece of evidence? That right there just made me pause the video and say "HOLY ****!" I need to know where that piece of evidence came from.
#260
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 03:07
elitehunter34 wrote...
shodiswe wrote...
IronSabbath88 wrote...
For me, you touched on the one thing that I feel is the best evidence possible for IT and that's the gunshot wound that the camera purposely makes a huge deal of.
That to me is the most solid thing going for the IT, but if people want it, I say go for it... I don't think it's necessary though.
I just don't get the gunwound thing you're throwing around.. the marauder also known as "Marauder Shields" to IT peopel shot shepard, and the medigel dispenser systems were broken, his suit didn't automaticaly seal the wound and he/she couldn't apply a larget dose because all the medical gear was busted...
Shepard limps wounded all the way from the beam and over to where they meet TIM.. still wounded.. Still no medigel or other firstaid options...
Why does it come as such a surprise that shepard is still wounded with a rifle shot after shooting Anderson?
So it goes from Shepard is wounded by marauder => Shepard is wounded it's a miracle and must have a psychological explanation and be proof that it's all a dream?![]()
Why are most so called Proofs in the IT explained using extremely complicated explanations and concepts (for no reason) when there are simple explanations?
It's not a mystery or a secret that the Marauder in front of the beam shot shepard, he always does that, it can't be avoided. And then after a while that gun wound becommes a miraculous proof that shepard is dreaming or something... Seriously?
Some people here called it the most convincing piece of proof in the IT and I find it farfetched.... The theoretical approach behind the theory seems to be to look for proof that you might get a replay of the entire end of the game with a real ending.
To this end you come up with incredibly complex explanations to make it all a dream and twist things til it makes no sense.
You are looking for an explanation that feels good and serves your goal instead of looking at what's the most reasonable explanation and if it's reasonable to interpret that much value into a piece of proof that defies further examination.
I don't like the current ending and changing it and improving it to the level of excellence we had on Tuchanka would have been lovely but I don't want to get into selfdelusions that tells me I will get it, when the theory representing it looks like something written by a UFO conspiracy theorist. I'm trying my best to use civil words here.
Sometimes I wonder, do you people really belive in this stuff or are you just hoping BW will fix the ending?
To me it looks like the product of similar creative works as those found below... All I ever get is insults or comments that it can't be compared to religion. Though noone has ever told me "why not?"
Some times I get comments like, we arn't studdying religion, were studdying a work fiction and using reason and debating the clues. We make assumptions then if we like it we go with it and then we got a fact.
Therefor Assumption + assumption + more assumptions = added facts = truth.
What really anoys me is people running all over claiming IT is some kind of truth, hopefully most of the air will have gone out of the IT in a few days. Unfortunately the ending will probably dissapoint me but hopefully it's a lot better than what we had on release. Least it might look like they put some effort into it.
You're thinking of the wrong gunshot wound. The marauder shot him in the shoulder, but the wound that the camera focuses on is Shepard's wound on his left abdomen. That's where Shepard shot Anderson. Shepard was never shot on his left abdomen. I believe it's supposed to represent Shepard succombing to the Reaper's indoctrination.
Anyways, the one piece of evidence that makes me still have strong hope for IT is the piece that Ownaholic mentions in his original video at about the 59 minute mark. The fact that theres a file called "Dream foliage" and the foliage in it is from the planet where the Normandy crashes. Can anyone provide a link to that piece of evidence? That right there just made me pause the video and say "HOLY ****!" I need to know where that piece of evidence came from.
None of my .bik files from the PC version has that file name... The only dream files or references Ican find are those related to the dreams shepard is having about the kid with people from shepards past and present talking in the background..
I think it's a little unclear where Marauder **** shepard also Marauder fires more than one shot I think.
You can also see how shepard is applying pressure to his abdomen when trying to get up after getting beamed to the citadel.
If shepard got hit in the shoulder I would think he/she would be more concerned about not exerting the shoulder than trying to hold his/her guts inside while trying to stand up..
The view of shepards abdomal wound and bleeding is just another way for Bioware to demonstrate shepards heroic resolve, no matter what shepard keeps going. I just sadens me that shepard gave up so badly when facing off with the catalyst... Though standing up might have been heroic enough if should be dead already. Still I didn't like it.
#261
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 03:48
Yeah, I'm still looking for the source of the "Dream Foliage" file mentioned in Ownaholic's video. It such damning proof I think he should have provided the source for that. It makes for some pretty damning evidence of IT.
Modifié par elitehunter34, 23 juin 2012 - 03:49 .
#262
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 04:02
Also burns coagulate, while the marauder slugs will lead to shepard bleeding to death unless the bleedings stop.
Modifié par shodiswe, 23 juin 2012 - 04:12 .
#263
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 04:08
#264
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 04:20
The Indoctrination Theory has been set up so nicely just go with it
#265
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 04:22
#266
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 04:24
youtube allows you to copy the link before it uploads.
Cheers!
#267
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 04:44
http://youtu.be/N0L9....be/N0L9fzTjQ8w
Just know that you probably won't be able to watch it for another 12-15 hours, at least. Because YouTube is sloooooooooooooooooow.
Modifié par Ownaholic, 23 juin 2012 - 04:44 .
#268
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 04:49
#269
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 09:42
Ownaholic wrote...
It is currently still being uploaded, and then it will have to process, but if you REALLY still want the link, here it is:
http://youtu.be/N0L9....be/N0L9fzTjQ8w
Just know that you probably won't be able to watch it for another 12-15 hours, at least. Because YouTube is sloooooooooooooooooow.
I really want to see the video i hope it uploads soon!
#270
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 09:45
Angelo2027 wrote...
Ownaholic wrote...
It is currently still being uploaded, and then it will have to process, but if you REALLY still want the link, here it is:
http://youtu.be/N0L9....be/N0L9fzTjQ8w
Just know that you probably won't be able to watch it for another 12-15 hours, at least. Because YouTube is sloooooooooooooooooow.
I really want to see the video i hope it uploads soon!
#271
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 09:54
OOOOOOO yay!Ownaholic wrote...
It is currently still being uploaded, and then it will have to process, but if you REALLY still want the link, here it is:
http://youtu.be/N0L9....be/N0L9fzTjQ8w
Just know that you probably won't be able to watch it for another 12-15 hours, at least. Because YouTube is sloooooooooooooooooow.
#272
Posté 23 juin 2012 - 09:59
TheAwesomologist wrote...
I'd watch it. I didn't buy into indoctrination theory, still haven't been convinced, but it's not a terrible argument and video was well done.
This^
Though I'd say I bought into IDT as plausible, I never thought it intended. I thought maybe BW might incorporate it as a way to do damage control.
#273
Posté 24 juin 2012 - 12:43
#274
Posté 24 juin 2012 - 04:22
#275
Posté 24 juin 2012 - 04:32
This was posted two hours ago on the first Documentary vid.CleverNoobNetwork wrote...
Latest Update:
Well, there was a snag unfortunately. I had to re-render the video to fix a problem, and restart the upload process all over again. It should be up and ready for everyone to view it in about 13-15 hours from the time of this post. It all depends on how fast YouTube can upload now.
Thanks for your patience! And hey, at least it will be here tomorrow! That's a lot better than Tuesday. =P
Modifié par viggorrah, 24 juin 2012 - 04:33 .





Retour en haut




