742 réponses à ce sujet

[garrusfan1]

justafan wrote...

It just isn't Mass Effect without Team Dextro. Tali and Garrus are hugely popular, thus they get to be in all the games. The Quarian/Geth war was obviously going to be a major arch in ME3, and Tali is essential to that, so she was going to be a big character regardless, and due to her popularity it makes sense to bring her back on the Normandy. Jack on the other hand never had that kind of following, and a lot of people didn't like her in ME2 unless they took the time to romance her. She was great in ME3, and in her short appearance had a lot of character development, but it seems highly unlikely she was replaced by Tali considering she was never all that important to the plot or a fan-favorite.

she does have a huge following but their not as.....lets say dedicated no offense talimancers

[Arlionis]

justafan wrote...

The Quarian/Geth war was obviously going to be a major arch in ME3, and Tali is essential to that,

How is she essential in any way? you can get that arch done even if she died in ME2. That doesn't make her look very "essential" to me. 

[alec1898]

Arlionis wrote...

lillitheris wrote...

Why is it always THERE IS TOO LITTLE OF MY FAVOURITE THEREFORE REMOVE EVERYBODY ELSE’S!!!1

Instead of, say, “Jack should be a squadmate too”?

It's not "remove everyone else", it's: remove a character that was already overused, was a squadmember in the three games and let other characters have some spothlight time. 

Oh, great. There goes Garrus and Tali.

What, do you want me to take Vega?

[Gen Petitt]

Within ten minuets you will have hate mail from the tali thread enjoy

[Ponei]

 

[Fenrisfil]

^

OP - Critical Mission Failure.

"When will Bioware make a game just for me, catered only to me and not taking into account other peoples views. Shame on Bioware. Don't they know I'm the only person that counts".

That's how I read it anyway.

Modifié par Fenrisfil, 16 mai 2012 - 01:57 .

[darthrevaninlight]

HAY
U GUYS ARE DUMB

HURRHURR

[Olueq]

Lol, so because you dont like one character, they should give up on her? What about Garrus? Joker? Liara? The VS? Garrus is recruited early in all 3 games and he has little plot relevance.

This thread makes NO sense.

Modifié par Olueq, 16 mai 2012 - 01:57 .

[garrusfan1]

alec1898 wrote...

Arlionis wrote...

lillitheris wrote...

Why is it always THERE IS TOO LITTLE OF MY FAVOURITE THEREFORE REMOVE EVERYBODY ELSE’S!!!1

Instead of, say, “Jack should be a squadmate too”?

It's not "remove everyone else", it's: remove a character that was already overused, was a squadmember in the three games and let other characters have some spothlight time. 

Oh, great. There goes Garrus and Tali.

What, do you want me to take Vega?

no more vega please (shudder) no offense to his fans

[garrusfan1]

Gen Petitt wrote...

Within ten minuets you will have hate mail from the tali thread enjoy

its funny cause its true

[justafan]

Arlionis wrote...

justafan wrote...

The Quarian/Geth war was obviously going to be a major arch in ME3, and Tali is essential to that,

How is she essential in any way? you can get that arch done even if she died in ME2. That doesn't make her look very "essential" to me. 

Her role is foreshadowed in ME2, after her loyalty she reveals she is being vetted as a replacement for her father, her loyalty mission is also directly tied in to the conflict thus making her important to it.

Also, Jack and Garrus can die too, yet you still get Grissom and Menae,  part of the hazard of being in ME2, yet the death of any of the three arguably make their respective archs lose appeal.

[Gen Petitt]

I warned you we even have our website now deal with it

Modifié par Gen Petitt, 16 mai 2012 - 01:58 .

[alec1898]

Gen Petitt wrote...

I warned you we even have our website now deal with it

Ummm.

What? Clarification is needed.

[Arlionis]

justafan wrote...

Arlionis wrote...

justafan wrote...

The Quarian/Geth war was obviously going to be a major arch in ME3, and Tali is essential to that,

How is she essential in any way? you can get that arch done even if she died in ME2. That doesn't make her look very "essential" to me. 

Her role is foreshadowed in ME2, after her loyalty she reveals she is being vetted as a replacement for her father, her loyalty mission is also directly tied in to the conflict thus making her important to it.

That doesn't mean anything since you can still get the optimal outcome without her. She isn't essential. 

[JustOneGuy]

darthrevaninlight wrote...

HAY
U GUYS ARE DUMB

HURRHURR

But seriously, you guys have to learn, that your opinion is just one of many!

[justafan]

garrusfan1 wrote...

justafan wrote...

It just isn't Mass Effect without Team Dextro. Tali and Garrus are hugely popular, thus they get to be in all the games. The Quarian/Geth war was obviously going to be a major arch in ME3, and Tali is essential to that, so she was going to be a big character regardless, and due to her popularity it makes sense to bring her back on the Normandy. Jack on the other hand never had that kind of following, and a lot of people didn't like her in ME2 unless they took the time to romance her. She was great in ME3, and in her short appearance had a lot of character development, but it seems highly unlikely she was replaced by Tali considering she was never all that important to the plot or a fan-favorite.

she does have a huge following but their not as.....lets say dedicated no offense talimancers

Ya, I guess I should have phrased that better, but I do think it is safe to say that her popularity exceeds Jack's, and likely to a noticable degree.  It would have been great to have her in ME3, don't get me wrong, but I think the better move was to include Tali if both were not an option  (fingers crossed for ME2 Squad DLC at some point).

[G Kevin]

Simplest way I can put it.

The needs of the many over the needs of the few.

[Gen Petitt]

Gen Petitt wrote...

Within ten minuets you will have hate mail from the tali thread enjoy

Here is my clarification
And the Tali thread on the BSN created their own website

[garrusfan1]

Arlionis wrote...

justafan wrote...

Arlionis wrote...

justafan wrote...

The Quarian/Geth war was obviously going to be a major arch in ME3, and Tali is essential to that,

How is she essential in any way? you can get that arch done even if she died in ME2. That doesn't make her look very "essential" to me. 

Her role is foreshadowed in ME2, after her loyalty she reveals she is being vetted as a replacement for her father, her loyalty mission is also directly tied in to the conflict thus making her important to it.

That doesn't mean anything since you can still get the optimal outcome without her. She isn't essential. 

wait I thought she was

[justafan]

Arlionis wrote...

justafan wrote...

Arlionis wrote...

justafan wrote...

The Quarian/Geth war was obviously going to be a major arch in ME3, and Tali is essential to that,

How is she essential in any way? you can get that arch done even if she died in ME2. That doesn't make her look very "essential" to me. 

Her role is foreshadowed in ME2, after her loyalty she reveals she is being vetted as a replacement for her father, her loyalty mission is also directly tied in to the conflict thus making her important to it.

That doesn't mean anything since you can still get the optimal outcome without her. She isn't essential. 

I'm pretty sure there is no peace without Tali, so no, you can't get the optimal outcome without her.

[alec1898]

JustOneGuy wrote...

darthrevaninlight wrote...

HAY
U GUYS ARE DUMB

HURRHURR

But seriously, you guys have to learn, that your opinion is just one of many!

I know right, you're like, JustOneGuy.


Eh? Eeeeh? I thought it was clever.