1. They are very superior to the Asari and SalariansCatamantaloedis wrote...
1. Except that the Turian fleet is not all that superior to the Asari/Salarians. Even if they are not tremendous advantages, they are advantages nonetheless.
2. Holding a bunch of figureheads without power is more or less irrelevant. The real government is on Thessia and Sur'Kesh.
3. Except that they are not going to be winning every battle, especially against foes which are not much weaker. I've said it once, I'll say it a million times, having a superior military does not mean that you can conquer enemies of near equal strength, or even lesser stength given the correct circumstances, without essentially destroying yourself. It did not work for the Roman Empire, it did not work for France, or Spain, or Austria it did not work for the British nor the Germans, it did not work for the United States, it did not work for the Soviet Union.
Being the strongest doesn't mean that you can completely dominate your enemies entirely.
2. Political hostage is Political hostage
3. Given philosophies in war, numbers, ect. the Turians could get them to the point where they would surrender, and win most battles, without destroying themselves. Might continue this tomorrow, might not. night.





Retour en haut






