146 réponses à ce sujet

[ObserverStatus]

 Blizzard is usually known for creating superb games that never fail to satisfy their customers, but this year they've been outdone by BioWare!  Congratulations guys!

Mass Effect 3 - 3.9
Diablo 3 - 3.5

[Volus Warlord]

bobobo878 wrote...

 Blizzard is usually known for creating superb games that never fail to satisfy their customers, but this year they've been outdone by BioWare!  Congratulations guys!

Mass Effect 3 - 3.9
Diablo 3 - 3.5

Blizzard is still the better company. Diablo 3 had growth pains vs. ME3's complete and utter nonsense.

[Sajji]

I forgot to voice my opinion of how Diablo III got ruined. Ruined atmosphere, ruined gameplay mechanics, ruined crafting...and dumbed down.

Heading over to metacritic. Thanks for the reminder.

[Gibb_Shepard]

Why? Did the company somehow offend the customers? Does the game have retarded DRM? Or do people actually dislike the game?

[ObserverStatus]

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

Why? Did the company somehow offend the customers? Does the game have retarded DRM? Or do people actually dislike the game?

About a third didn't like the color pallette, two thirds are amd that they can't log in.

[jackofalltrades456]

Eh, most of it is just people ****ing about not being able to log in.

It's odd that they wouldn't give an offline mode like with Starcraft 2.

Modifié par jackofalltrades456, 16 mai 2012 - 04:01 .

[ObserverStatus]

jackofalltrades456 wrote...

Eh,most of it is just people ****ing about not being able to log in.

a vocal minority think that the colors are too pretty

[Zubie]

I think it is a great game *shrug*

[Captain Cornhole]

The only Blizzard game i bought was SC2 and I was not impressed.

[Captain Cornhole]

easygame88 wrote...

I think it is a great game *shrug*

How could you think it's a great game. The plot is horrible and cliche. Ofcousre they kill off half the characters and Leah is actually Diablo (diabla) horrible horrible ending.

[Zubie]

so I guess you have beaten the game then?

[jackofalltrades456]

Captain Cornhole wrote...

Leah is actually Diablo (diabla) horrible horrible ending.

Does this mean we're going to send Blizzard cupcakes and start a chairty?

[MingWolf]

jackofalltrades456 wrote...

Eh, most of it is just people ****ing about not being able to log in.

It's odd that they wouldn't give an offline mode like with Starcraft 2.

I'd be pretty angry if I can't log in and play a game I bought too.  

[Sajji]

Why do you pc gamers tolerate not being able to "log on" to play your games?

It's so nice to sit back on the couch, open up your disk drive, pop in the game and play.

[Zubie]

Did people really expect anything different on the first day of a popular multiplayer game? Not saying it should happen but it does for just about every single one.

[SOLID_EVEREST]

I love the fact that developers care so much about Metacritic scores; it makes me feel like the customers actually matter for once.

Anyways, pretty hilarious that Mass Effect: 3 got such a bad rating. Since I never cared for the series, I definitely missed the explosion these board had (I hope it was as big as the Dragon Age: II fiasco), and the developers/moderators saying how it must have been Four Chan raids or something .

I'm surprised Diablo: III wasn't an instant 70-90 in the user reviews; it seems like it had a strong following.

[Homebound]

i think gamers everywhere have finally reach their breaking point. I hope fan outcry like this becomes the norm. Expect nothing but the best fellow gamers.

Modifié par Hellbound555, 16 mai 2012 - 04:38 .

[Cutlass Jack]

easygame88 wrote...

Did people really expect anything different on the first day of a popular multiplayer game? Not saying it should happen but it does for just about every single one.

Except that its also a single player game thats being forced to be online anyway.

[Sajji]

Hellbound555 wrote...

i think gamers everywhere have finally reach their breaking point. I hope fan outcry like this becomes the norm. Expect nothing but the best fellow gamers.

Amen, brother.

[Sajji]

SOLID_EVEREST wrote...

I love the fact that developers care so much about Metacritic scores; it makes me feel like the customers actually matter for once.

Anyways, pretty hilarious that Mass Effect: 3 got such a bad rating. Since I never cared for the series, I definitely missed the explosion these board had (I hope it was as big as the Dragon Age: II fiasco), and the developers/moderators saying how it must have been Four Chan raids or something .

I'm surprised Diablo: III wasn't an instant 70-90 in the user reviews; it seems like it had a strong following.

Gamers will tell devs they don't like how things are being dumbed down. Gamers get ignored. Backlash occurs, and then they act all shocked and stunned and do their own metacritic bombings to try to bring the score up.

Btw...Forbes magazine is again being objective in the whole ordeal. That game writer over there is away from early access and insider info score bribes and can tell it how it is. It's amazing when you see objectivity...it punches you in the brain when you read it.

[Zubie]

Cutlass Jack wrote...

easygame88 wrote...

Did people really expect anything different on the first day of a popular multiplayer game? Not saying it should happen but it does for just about every single one.

Except that its also a single player game thats being forced to be online anyway.

You can simply play online in a game by yourself, but yeah I know what you mean.

[Sajji]

I'm curious what Bethesda forums are saying. Will report back.

[ObserverStatus]

SOLID_EVEREST wrote...

I love the fact that developers care so much about Metacritic scores; it makes me feel like the customers actually matter for once.

Anyways, pretty hilarious that Mass Effect: 3 got such a bad rating. Since I never cared for the series, I definitely missed the explosion these board had (I hope it was as big as the Dragon Age: II fiasco), and the developers/moderators saying how it must have been Four Chan raids or something .

I'm surprised Diablo: III wasn't an instant 70-90 in the user reviews; it seems like it had a strong following.

well yeah, it did have a strong following, its follower are just mad that they can't play it.

Modifié par bobobo878, 16 mai 2012 - 05:48 .

[Cyberarmy]

Cutlass Jack wrote...

easygame88 wrote...

Did people really expect anything different on the first day of a popular multiplayer game? Not saying it should happen but it does for just about every single one.

Except that its also a single player game thats being forced to be online anyway.

And last nights server issues mess was a solid proof of DRM plague.
It took me 45 minutes to create a character and get in game ... And couldnt message anybody...
Assumedly  Blizzard has the greatest online game handling experience yet they fail miserably last night.
All i can say is;

Dear Blizzard

[Arppis]

jackofalltrades456 wrote...

Eh, most of it is just people ****ing about not being able to log in.

It's odd that they wouldn't give an offline mode like with Starcraft 2.

Reduces the piracy... or so they think.