Ce sujet est fermé
Seagloom wrote...
I wasn't calling anyone here out with the hipster comment.
naughty99 wrote...
So there's a My Little Pony level in the game?
Modifié par Skelter192, 16 mai 2012 - 11:20 .
naughty99 wrote...
So there's a My Little Pony level in the game?
Volus Warlord wrote...
Bah, gotta wait a month for the demo. ><
Costin_Razvan wrote...
How is the actual game Skelter?
JasonRocker wrote...
Sajji wrote...
Why do you pc gamers tolerate not being able to "log on" to play your games?
It's so nice to sit back on the couch, open up your disk drive, pop in the game and play.
I had invested a large amount into TOR. I spent 500 bucks at the time for Ge Force 580GTX, even better I bought a 24 inch screen from DELL. I never kept my xbox360's or PS3 because I got bored of them and wound up selling them usually for around a hundred.
I feel the need to go back to playing on my console. What other games are out there. I was looking to ME3 and TOR. Now I kinda feel need to get my PS3 and play heavy rain. Both games imo scored terrible. This is 4 out of 10? what does that game about gaming companys.
Skelter192 wrote...
Heh hipsters suck no one likes being called one.
Most every game has bugs, FONV has had nothing major for me.Elton John is dead wrote...
TBH Obsidian deserved it for releasing a bugged game. Maybe they'll learn in future.
That doesn't refute the general point. As for agreeing to the deal, the alternative was in all probability not to do the game, which is hardly realistic.naughty99 wrote...
If they didn't like the terms of their deal, they shouldn't have agreed to it. At any rate their bonus was based on critic scores, not user scores.
ME3 doesn't require an always on connection to the origin servers.MingWolf wrote...
Technically, this is exactly like having to login to Origin to play Mass Effect 3.
Modifié par Morroian, 17 mai 2012 - 05:26 .
addiction21 wrote...
naughty99 wrote...
So there's a My Little Pony level in the game?
Pretty much. Everyone was complaining about how the game was not dark enough and then at one of the cons the devs came out with diablo tshirts with unicorns on them.
And that is the new Cow Level.
And honestly I have been thru enough of the dungrouns and zones and there are plenty of dark creepy areas for my taste.
bobobo878 wrote...
Blizzard is usually known for creating superb games that never fail to satisfy their customers, but this year they've been outdone by BioWare! Congratulations guys!
Mass Effect 3 - 3.9
Diablo 3 - 3.5
Tirigon wrote...
bobobo878 wrote...
Blizzard is usually known for creating superb games that never fail to satisfy their customers, but this year they've been outdone by BioWare! Congratulations guys!
Mass Effect 3 - 3.9
Diablo 3 - 3.5
The difference is.....
Mass Effect 3 was rated far better than it deserves, Diablo was review-bombed.
Tirigon wrote...
bobobo878 wrote...
Blizzard is usually known for creating superb games that never fail to satisfy their customers, but this year they've been outdone by BioWare! Congratulations guys!
Mass Effect 3 - 3.9
Diablo 3 - 3.5
The difference is.....
Mass Effect 3 was rated far better than it deserves, Diablo was review-bombed.
Sajji wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
bobobo878 wrote...
Blizzard is usually known for creating superb games that never fail to satisfy their customers, but this year they've been outdone by BioWare! Congratulations guys!
Mass Effect 3 - 3.9
Diablo 3 - 3.5
The difference is.....
Mass Effect 3 was rated far better than it deserves, Diablo was review-bombed.
I respect your opinion, but again, how is a game you spend $60 of your hard-earned money that people literally cannot play at launch worthy of anything but a 0/10? Then, additionally, hordes of gamers experience massive lagging from the servers that are disrupting their (singleplayer) games.
If Blizzard demands on incorporating DRM for their benevolent real money auction house, its logical to incorporate the DRM into the game itself and any experience with it as part of the game. The consumer sure didn't ask for DRM.
Persephone wrote...
Sajji wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
bobobo878 wrote...
Blizzard is usually known for creating superb games that never fail to satisfy their customers, but this year they've been outdone by BioWare! Congratulations guys!
Mass Effect 3 - 3.9
Diablo 3 - 3.5
The difference is.....
Mass Effect 3 was rated far better than it deserves, Diablo was review-bombed.
I respect your opinion, but again, how is a game you spend $60 of your hard-earned money that people literally cannot play at launch worthy of anything but a 0/10? Then, additionally, hordes of gamers experience massive lagging from the servers that are disrupting their (singleplayer) games.
If Blizzard demands on incorporating DRM for their benevolent real money auction house, its logical to incorporate the DRM into the game itself and any experience with it as part of the game. The consumer sure didn't ask for DRM.
If technical bugs rate a full game a 0, then every single TES launch is a 0. Including the sacred monster called Skyrim which is unplayable to a huge bunch of folks due to bugs and the usual crashes. The almost expected BTD crash every TES game suffers from justifies a rating of 0 then.....
NO, the full game is what matters. I cannot rate a game I haven't played yet. If I rent a movie and my VCR (Yes, still have one) eats the tape & thus ruins movie night.... I'm not rating the movie or the VCR as a 0 either.
Modifié par Sajji, 17 mai 2012 - 03:19 .
Sajji wrote...
Persephone wrote...
Sajji wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
bobobo878 wrote...
Blizzard is usually known for creating superb games that never fail to satisfy their customers, but this year they've been outdone by BioWare! Congratulations guys!
Mass Effect 3 - 3.9
Diablo 3 - 3.5
The difference is.....
Mass Effect 3 was rated far better than it deserves, Diablo was review-bombed.
I respect your opinion, but again, how is a game you spend $60 of your hard-earned money that people literally cannot play at launch worthy of anything but a 0/10? Then, additionally, hordes of gamers experience massive lagging from the servers that are disrupting their (singleplayer) games.
If Blizzard demands on incorporating DRM for their benevolent real money auction house, its logical to incorporate the DRM into the game itself and any experience with it as part of the game. The consumer sure didn't ask for DRM.
If technical bugs rate a full game a 0, then every single TES launch is a 0. Including the sacred monster called Skyrim which is unplayable to a huge bunch of folks due to bugs and the usual crashes. The almost expected BTD crash every TES game suffers from justifies a rating of 0 then.....
NO, the full game is what matters. I cannot rate a game I haven't played yet. If I rent a movie and my VCR (Yes, still have one) eats the tape & thus ruins movie night.... I'm not rating the movie or the VCR as a 0 either.
Ironic you bring up TES. Since you admitted its a duel street, where is Blizzard's bug belittling? Then again, TES is still multiple times larger than Diablo 3.
If this summer you went to see a movie you're very much looking forward to...buying popcorn and a big soda and you get there early...and you proceed to stare at a blank screen for 2 or 3 hours because the production company made it so you had to log into a server to watch, I highly doubt you'd be very happy.
Sajji wrote...
I bet you'd be tempted to. Sitting there, soda and popcorn staring at a blank screen. It's not like you asked for that movie to be on a server. It could be gold in a film reel, that you paid a solid $12 for. Maybe you took off work...using a vacation day to see it...all wasted.
Btw...not being confrontational...just good lively discussion, my fellow gamer
Guest_Trust_*
Sajji wrote...
I respect your opinion, but again, how is a game you spend $60 of your hard-earned money that people literally cannot play at launch worthy of anything but a 0/10? Then, additionally, hordes of gamers experience massive lagging from the servers that are disrupting their (singleplayer) games.
If Blizzard demands on incorporating DRM for their benevolent real money auction house, its logical to incorporate the DRM into the game itself and any experience with it as part of the game. The consumer sure didn't ask for DRM.
I disagree with you on this.IMO,the reason why they seem to ignore what we want is they actually know what they are doing.suntzuxi wrote...
I do not think you can compare this two games' user score performance because they failed in different ways. although ME3 is a very good game, BioWare still failed because they had no idea what their fans want. Blizzard just temporarily failed . Once their servers are up, fans will be back and play it for years. the Meta user score means nothing to Blizzard but it will hurt BioWare.
Persephone wrote...
In your opinion.
When it's something you like it's review bombing....yadda dadda... been there, done that.
Both games were review bombed by trolls. MC is an abomination.
Allen Spellwaver wrote...
I disagree with you on this.IMO,the reason why they seem to ignore what we want is they actually know what they are doing.suntzuxi wrote...
I do not think you can compare this two games' user score performance because they failed in different ways. although ME3 is a very good game, BioWare still failed because they had no idea what their fans want. Blizzard just temporarily failed . Once their servers are up, fans will be back and play it for years. the Meta user score means nothing to Blizzard but it will hurt BioWare.
Tirigon wrote...
Persephone wrote...
In your opinion.
When it's something you like it's review bombing....yadda dadda... been there, done that.
Both games were review bombed by trolls. MC is an abomination.
No, that's not the point. The point is, Diablo 3 is OBJECTIVELY NOT a bad game.
ME3, otoh, did not, in my opinion and that of many others (But let's keep this topic out plz),
Retour en haut
