187 réponses à ce sujet

[JamieCOTC]

Parts of ME3 feel very rushed, especially the ending. We don't need the DLC to fix the rushed endings to be rushed either.

Modifié par JamieCOTC, 17 mai 2012 - 07:18 .

[D1ck1e]

Do it right, or don't do it. I want them to take all the time they need, which they should have done from the start.

[shepskisaac]

Tazzmission wrote...

imo the endings werent great nor horibble just confusing really

Agree. There IS potential in their ending concepts, but it was horribly presented/executed. If EC fixes that, I think great majority of fans will be happy.

[TsaiMeLemoni]

I love how there are complaints that ME3, particularly the ending, was rushed (and I count myself in this camp somewhat), but then we have these people complaining that they aren't rushing the content that's supposed to fixed the rushed ending!

If you want something of quality, chill out and wait.

[DGMockingJay]

Zenor wrote...

>ME3 ending was rushed. Should of had more time.
>Extended cut is taking to long to make, come out already.
What

Read the post again.... I m not complaining. I m just wondering, as stated in the original post.

chibilombax wrote...

Well first they have to write a script. Plan out scenes. Get voice work. Animate. It's not a very quick process.

That is if any of this is actually in the DLC and not just Shepard running into a beam in slow motion or text boxes.

But I think same amount of time wud b required to come up with a DLC with actual gameplay in it. Like LotSB, that had like 3-4 hrs of gamekplay and more than 20-30 minutes of cutscenes and dialogues.

[soulprovider]

I think people are misunderstanding the OP's post he wants them to take their time, the silence is deafening thought.

[darkdruid117]

They said summer, not mid/late spring. And Edolix is right, if they rush it they have a higher chance of "screwing it up". It takes time to create these things. No matter what I feel bad for them because I do not see it ending well for them. They are in a complete and absolute catch 22.

[eddieoctane]

Last day of summer is Friday, September 21st. Don't expect anything before then. I sure as hell don't.

[UrgentArchengel]

If anything a status report on how things are going (Not the typical "We are working very hard" tweets). It would be nice to get an idea of what's up. They can work on it till it's perfect, just would like a real status report for once.

[chibilombax]

But I think same amount of time wud b required to come up with a DLC with actual gameplay in it. Like LotSB, that had like 3-4 hrs of gamekplay and more than 20-30 minutes of cutscenes and dialogues.



[/quote]

Well I THINK I read that this is more of a fixer upper for the ending then an actual dlc. To help explain and add details to it. If there is actual gameplay then well I'm not sure what they would put in. Unless it was perhaps a thing like the Fallout DLC that gave you different options. Something about choosing a immune to poison/radiation character to go into a toxic zone rather then kill your character. yeah I never played those games I'm going by stuff I read during ME3's release.

[ghost9191]

i hope they take their time on it also i just wish they weren't this silent about all this. They messed up they should own up to it instead of hiding. Would feel better about the situation if i knew they understood what their fans thought

[ghost9191]

eddieoctane wrote...

Last day of summer is Friday, September 21st. Don't expect anything before then. I sure as hell don't.

Sept 22nd is my bday     i always wanted a free dlc

[Tazzmission]

IsaacShep wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

imo the endings werent great nor horibble just confusing really

Agree. There IS potential in their ending concepts, but it was horribly presented/executed. If EC fixes that, I think great majority of fans will be happy.

see the things im confused about are and shockingly i dont mind the relays blowing up at all   and i really had to think on it also


my list of confusion


why cant we learn more of the catalyst? what is his hard on for comitting genocide on synthetics? the answer he gives still dosent help shepard and the player understand

how did the 2 people in my squad i had with me go to the beam on the normandy? did they retreat when shepard was blasted by harbys beam?


the normandy crash needs explination because 1. why is it only joker edi my love interest and javik that survive? what happened to the others? did they did in the crash?

2nd. do the survivng crew of the normandy meet a culture on the planet they land on? or does the alliance issue a search and rescue? without the relays how many years wil it take to find them?

also how did tim controll shepard into shooting anderson? is it because maybe tim slipped in a chip that he once said no to?

Modifié par Tazzmission, 17 mai 2012 - 07:26 .

[ardias89]

Bioware for the love of god do not rush! Would like some details though

[shepskisaac]

DGMockingJay wrote...

But I think same amount of time wud b required to come up with a DLC with actual gameplay in it. Like LotSB, that had like 3-4 hrs of gamekplay and more than 20-30 minutes of cutscenes and dialogues.

LOTSB still took 3 months after Overlord was released. Overlord took 2 months after Kasumi was released etc.

Just because there're no new gameplay areas to be made in EC doesn't mean it has less work to do. Think about it. If they're implementing cutscenes for War Assets during Priority: London, they may dozens of necessary cutscenes/pre-rendered movies to create depending on choices/which War Assets you got.

Modifié par IsaacShep, 17 mai 2012 - 07:26 .

[CroGamer002]

IsaacShep wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

imo the endings werent great nor horibble just confusing really

Agree. There IS potential in their ending concepts, but it was horribly presented/executed. If EC fixes that, I think great majority of fans will be happy.

Considering they won't remvoe anything, no way they can fix how are this endings presented.


I mean shooting a part of of Crucible to activate it to destroy Reapers?

Throwing yourself into Crucible beam to make everyone a borg?

Space magic of Synthesis?

Forcing everyone to be borg?

Making synthetics part organics by adding DNA?

Normandy escaping with entire crew?




That can not be fixed since by themselves are a huge problem.
They have to either completely change it or remove it.



So endings will still suck, just EC will attempt to make us decide will we deal with it and still find there's point of anything with Mass Effect.

[CroGamer002]

IsaacShep wrote...

DGMockingJay wrote...

But I think same amount of time wud b required to come up with a DLC with actual gameplay in it. Like LotSB, that had like 3-4 hrs of gamekplay and more than 20-30 minutes of cutscenes and dialogues.

LOTSB still took 3 months after Overlord was released. Overlord took 2 months after Kasumi was released etc.

Just because there're no new gameplay areas to be made in EC doesn't mean it has less work to do. Think about it. If they're implementing cutscenes for War Assets during Priority: London, they may dozens of necessary cutscenes/pre-rendered movies to create depending on choices/which War Assets you got.

And you have to keep in mind they didn't start to make LotSB right after Overlord.

They were making it long before it.

Same for Overlord and Kasumi.

[Ryuzetsu]

Must be all the calibrations.

[Talogrungi]

What's taking them so long?

They're working on multiplayer DLC and prioritising it over the EC. Seriously.

[Tazzmission]

Mesina2 wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

imo the endings werent great nor horibble just confusing really

Agree. There IS potential in their ending concepts, but it was horribly presented/executed. If EC fixes that, I think great majority of fans will be happy.

Considering they won't remvoe anything, no way they can fix how are this endings presented.


I mean shooting a part of of Crucible to activate it to destroy Reapers?

Throwing yourself into Crucible beam to make everyone a borg?

Space magic of Synthesis?

Forcing everyone to be borg?

Making synthetics part organics by adding DNA?

Normandy escaping with entire crew?




That can not be fixed since by themselves are a huge problem.
They have to either completely change it or remove it.



So endings will still suck, just EC will attempt to make us decide will we deal with it and still find there's point of anything with Mass Effect.

tbh i think it was incomplete really 


because didnt they like go gold like a week before release?

maybe the content there working on now is that final vison they had?

[Taboo]

Talogrungi wrote...

What's taking them so long?

They're working on multiplayer DLC and prioritising it over the EC. Seriously.

SP and MP are seperate divisions.

Don't be an idiot.

[DGMockingJay]

soulprovider wrote...

I think people are misunderstanding the OP's post he wants them to take their time, the silence is deafening thought.

Thank U... Someone understands..I want them to take time... I m not even waiting for the EC,, since its going to b same turd of an ending, polished and served on a platter.

Although, people on Internet forums dont let slip a single chance to beat OP to death. Most people dont simply read the whole post. Just the title is enuf for them..

[TsaiMeLemoni]

Talogrungi wrote...

What's taking them so long?

They're working on multiplayer DLC and prioritising it over the EC. Seriously.

Yeah....you know there are separate teams working on the MP and SP content, right?

[SirRaven10]

The part I find interesting about this "extended" ending is how they'll resolve any need for voices. I really doubt they'd call voice actors back in to voice new scenes. So we're left to two possibilities:

1. They have a lot of "cut" material they can work with in order to elaborate on the endings
2. All the scenes they've planned to use as "elaborations" are in the same style as the current endings where they are set to music and no one says anything.