Taboo-XX wrote...
Seperate divisions that are under orders to do something that was already planned.
Just stop.
Talogrungi wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
Seperate divisions that are under orders to do something that was already planned.
Just stop.
No. Seriously, apologist behaviour like this is simply beyond ludicrous.
"Under orders" .. ? .. this isn't an edict handed down on a stone tablet that must be obeyed and can never be changed. There's nothing to stop a plan being altered to adapt to changing circumstance .. and that's exactly what Bioware should be doing.
Modifié par TsaiMeLemoni, 17 mai 2012 - 07:50 .
TSA_383 wrote...
I was saying in another thread something that kind of ties the MP/SP side together:TSA_383 wrote...
[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]RavenEyry wrote...
StarcloudSWG wrote...
Bioware's definition of foreshadowing;
Put all the hints into Day 1 DLC.
Make the DLC available for free only to Collector's Edition buyers.
Give *everyone* an incomplete game.
Then EA's contribution: Prevent customers of GAME from getting collectors editions. Steal candy from baby. Twirl moustache.
Then
-Add multiplayer
-Make it so that people who want to "win" the game are required to play multi player.
-Sell weapons to people who can't be arsed playing properly.
-Keep multiplayer events going, slowly mapping out the real conflict.
-Eventually
get to earth multiplayer event, announce new ending DLC at conclusion
of multiplayer event to vaugely tie it into the plot.
-Sell even more weapons to people who can't be arsed playing properly.
-Release DLC
-Get massive press coverage for surprise ending.
-Critical praise, ship another few hundred thousand copies, sell even more weapons to people who are new or just plain suck.
-Build new east wing for golden money-palace.
Sorted.
Thoughts?
TsaiMeLemoni wrote...
Talogrungi wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
Seperate divisions that are under orders to do something that was already planned.
Just stop.
No. Seriously, apologist behaviour like this is simply beyond ludicrous.
"Under orders" .. ? .. this isn't an edict handed down on a stone tablet that must be obeyed and can never be changed. There's nothing to stop a plan being altered to adapt to changing circumstance .. and that's exactly what Bioware should be doing.
If they bring in an entire team of people from another division who've never had anything to do with the SP content, don't you think it'd take more time to get them up to speed and to where they could actually contribute rather than I don't know....letting them do their jobs?
Edolix wrote...
Let them take as long as they like.
Seriously, don't try to rush them.
Guest_Arcian_*
When HL:E3 comes out.Zenor wrote...
I just want to see generals 2 and Pikmin 3Tazzmission wrote...
Baa Baa wrote...
EC can wait, I want to see Dead Space 3!Tazzmission wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
Because they are still creating it.
When they have something to show they will show it.
my money is itll be shown at e3 since it is a few weeks away
im also hoping for a official dead space 3 announcment as well
i want both and also gta 5 is rumored for october this year so im hoping for a official date on that as well
Vespervin wrote...
They're coming up with great ideas for the EC. Then, they got to figure out how to make it crap. That takes time.
Modifié par LazyTechGuy, 17 mai 2012 - 08:47 .
There's a new multiplayer DLC coming out "before the end of the month" due to Priestly.eddieoctane wrote...
TSA_383 wrote...
I was saying in another thread something that kind of ties the MP/SP side together:TSA_383 wrote...
[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]RavenEyry wrote...
StarcloudSWG wrote...
Bioware's definition of foreshadowing;
Put all the hints into Day 1 DLC.
Make the DLC available for free only to Collector's Edition buyers.
Give *everyone* an incomplete game.
Then EA's contribution: Prevent customers of GAME from getting collectors editions. Steal candy from baby. Twirl moustache.
Then
-Add multiplayer
-Make it so that people who want to "win" the game are required to play multi player.
-Sell weapons to people who can't be arsed playing properly.
-Keep multiplayer events going, slowly mapping out the real conflict.
-Eventually
get to earth multiplayer event, announce new ending DLC at conclusion
of multiplayer event to vaugely tie it into the plot.
-Sell even more weapons to people who can't be arsed playing properly.
-Release DLC
-Get massive press coverage for surprise ending.
-Critical praise, ship another few hundred thousand copies, sell even more weapons to people who are new or just plain suck.
-Build new east wing for golden money-palace.
Sorted.
Thoughts?
As plausible as anythign else. And it is a rather unique take on the gaming experience. I'd actually be really happy with this. But it has been weeks since any blogs or tweets related to the in-game events that could be used to establish a timetable for said ending DLC. So I don't know. Still, fun to think about.
Guest_john_sheparrd_*
Bronxboy wrote...
They can take as long as they need to make it right!
Besides, maybe in a year or so we'll have "Mass Effect 3: Director's Cut" - which would be the polished game we should have gotten in the first place!
hehe, I wish! =P
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Er...what?liggy002 wrote...
They have suspended development of the EC in light of the Diablo 3 release. All of their efforts are now on that game.
Retour en haut
