[quote]Ji99saw wrote...
[quote]BatmanTurian wrote...
[quote]Ji99saw wrote...
[quote]BatmanTurian wrote...
[quote]BatmanTurian wrote...
[quote] Ji99saw wrote...
It is actually you who is atempting a
red herring by trying change the subject at hand. I simply said at the begining until it is confirmed it did not happen. You are trying to make an argument of Interpitation and Fan fiction and how they are some how different even though they both alter the narraitive in one way or another given another persons perspective of the events presented. Wheather it's because you just completly made it up or because you think you see clues to a different conclusion is uniportant because they mean the same thing to me.
You can word it or call it what ever but at the end of the day I will stick by IT= Fan Fiction until comfirmed by Bioware[/quote]
I'm not changing the subject, you outright said that I was posing the IT as truth, but I wasn't. AGAIN it's not fan fiction. It's a literary interpretation about the story. All interpretations are made up based on what the interpreter thinks the story means. Did you EVER take English Lit?
[/quote]
Actually I said IT is fan fiction until proved otherwise and you say it's just interperation. And I simply said that it is not truth and don't pretend that it is and you appearently said I acused you of saying that it's truth. And of course you try end with somthing to insult my education but once again like your whole argument I don't care and comes across as childish (which you very well could be). I will say it once more until IT is confirmed by Bioware it is Fan Fiction because beleive it or not it has huge leaps in logic beyond simple "
intrpretation" and if you can't see that maybe you should "Wake Up" instead of Shepard.
[/quote]
I'm not insulting your intelligence. You simply do not seem to know the difference between interpretation and fan fiction. Fan fiction is making up stories in a universe created by another person, such as Milton's Paradise Lost. Interpretations are looking at a story and seeing symbolism and metaphor, such as what you might do in an English Book report.
if it was true that Literary Interpretation is Fan Fiction, then every Lit professor who has ever interpreted
literature and writes a paper on it for their thesis is writing " fan fiction".
[/quote]
Once again IT falls under fanfiction it makes leaps in logic which were not presented in the narraitive. To give you an example IT says that when Shepard shoots Anderson he feels the physical effects but when the Illusive man is shot no physical effect is noticed but they are both apart of him. Thats leaps in logic that are under IT meaning new elements are added to make IT true= Fan Fiction
[/quote]
http://en.wikipedia....iki/Fan_fictionhttp://en.wikipedia...._interpretationYou are ignorant. That is not an insult, but merely a fact. Know the meanings of terms before you use them.
From Fan Fiction:
"Fan fiction (alternatively referred to as
fanfiction,
fanfic,
FF, or
fic) is a broadly-defined term for
fan labor regarding stories about characters or settings written by fans of the
original work, rather than by the original creator. Works of fan fiction
are rarely commissioned or authorized by the original work's owner,
creator, or publisher; also, they are almost never professionally
published. Because of this, many fan fictions written often contain a
disclaimer stating that the creator of the work owns none of the
characters. Fan fiction, therefore, is defined by being both related to
its subject's
canonical fictional universe and simultaneously existing outside the canon of that universe.
[1] Most fan fiction writers assume that their work is read primarily by
other fans, and therefore tend to presume that their readers have
knowledge of the canon universe (created by a professional writer) in
which their works are based."
from Literary Interpretation:
"However important all of these aesthetic movements were as antecedents,
current ideas about literary criticism derive almost entirely from the
new direction taken in the early twentieth century. Early in the century
the school of criticism known as
Russian Formalism, and slightly later the
New Criticism in Britain and America, came to dominate the study and discussion of literature.
Both schools emphasized the close reading of texts, elevating it far above generalizing discussion and speculation about either authorial intention (to say nothing of the author's psychology or biography, which became almost taboo subjects) or reader response.
This emphasis on form and precise attention to "the words themselves"
has persisted, after the decline of these critical doctrines themselves."
Modifié par BatmanTurian, 17 mai 2012 - 10:58 .
Retour en haut
