Myself included.
Only because I'm such a softie.
Modifié par Taboo-XX, 19 mai 2012 - 01:36 .
Modifié par Taboo-XX, 19 mai 2012 - 01:36 .
Done, and done.Suraxis wrote...
It's getting to the point that I think Bioware will just give all of us a big middle finger. Everyone seems exhausted with the whole ordeal, including the voice actors, so I'm really bracing myself for one hell of a **** you.
Taboo-XX wrote...
They would be very foolish NOT to. It would shut a great deal of people up.
Myself included.
Only because I'm such a softie.
that would be grate that and the normandy are my top tow on my wish list I know sounds sad hay why the F not
Modifié par christrek1982, 19 mai 2012 - 01:34 .
jojon2se wrote...
With enough imagination, Henriksen's quote could even be taken to suggest there's either only lose-scenarios and that's how is is supposed to be, or there's an entire, different "winning" plotline to take at some point; such as rejecting the contrived Crucible project from the get-go and coming up with another solution, only every player misses it (...and those who don't keep quiet about it).
For voice actors it's just another session every few weeks/months. No different than working on DLC or having another take at lines. But for Bioware devs I have no doubt the whole thing has been exhausting. I don't expect any middle finger, but neither I expect them to be "zomg yess were were praying we would be able to work 4 more months on the core game right after crunch time!!!11"Suraxis wrote...
It's getting to the point that I think Bioware will just give all of us a big middle finger. Everyone seems exhausted with the whole ordeal, including the voice actors, so I'm really bracing myself for one hell of a **** you.
Taboo-XX wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
Lance:
"I just did another session with them...They were saying there's a little bit of a problem with the abruptness of the ending," Hendriksen said. "So we did a whole series of things to add to the end of the game, to live up to the quality they've been doing."
I'll state again.
Bioware knows what the problem is.
IsaacShep wrote...
If you replace "loses" with "finishes" in his quote, then it would make some sense. As it is, it makes no sense lol. Games don't "shut down" at game over screens and nobody works on content extending game over screen because why lol? I dunno, either he confused "finishes" with "loses" or he simply never played a game in his life and doesn't exactly know what he's talking about.Hanabii wrote...
...Maybe he counts 'winning the game' as 'losing the game'.
Deemz wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
Lance:
"I just did another session with them...They were saying there's a little bit of a problem with the abruptness of the ending," Hendriksen said. "So we did a whole series of things to add to the end of the game, to live up to the quality they've been doing."
I'll state again.
Bioware knows what the problem is.
What have they said that makes you think that? I know they know there is a problem but I have not seen anything that suggests they recognize what those issues are.
Deemz wrote...
Taboo -
I don't think they are doing it to mess with us. I know they are doing whatever they can to make as many people happy as they can. I do not doubt that at all. The reason I asked my question was because I honestly want to know if they had stated anywhere that they recognize the things that many people disliked. The question was directed at you because your statement read like you might have read something I missed. I know they would not go through the time and expense if they did not think we would like it. But, they also though we would love the current ending.
^ Hearty agreement.Taboo-XX wrote...
People believe that Bioware is going to explain their art to them because we are too stupid to understand it. I understand it just fine. It's the worst narrative execution I've ever seen and they need to know that.
Taboo-XX wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
Lance:
"I just did another session with them...They were saying there's a little bit of a problem with the abruptness of the ending," Hendriksen said. "So we did a whole series of things to add to the end of the game, to live up to the quality they've been doing."
I'll state again.
Bioware knows what the problem is.
Taboo-XX wrote...
The Extended Cut was not planned and the outcry is the result of that.
Do you really think they would bring in Tricia Helfer and Lance Henrickson just to **** with you? Do you believe that they aren't hurt in some capacity by this? That sixty thousand people didn't faze them? They are human beings with thoughts and feelings. You don't have to like them but you must respect them as human beings.
Don't think for one minute that Mr. Hudson and Mr. Walters don't know what the problem is.
Oldbones2 wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
Lance:
"I just did another session with them...They were saying there's a little bit of a problem with the abruptness of the ending," Hendriksen said. "So we did a whole series of things to add to the end of the game, to live up to the quality they've been doing."
I'll state again.
Bioware knows what the problem is.
But the aren't fixing it.
At this point, whatever reason they have for choosing this particular ending is irrelevant. A planned sequel, the film series, maybe its just cheaper, who knows, it doesn't matter.
Bioware has lost longtime customers over this.
EA has had they brand severely tarnished over this.
Mass Effect as a series may no longer have a future because of this.
Yet, even though they have every single business based reason in the world to fix this, they just don't seem to get it through their heads.
And I really can't fathom why.
Deemz wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
The Extended Cut was not planned and the outcry is the result of that.
Do you really think they would bring in Tricia Helfer and Lance Henrickson just to **** with you? Do you believe that they aren't hurt in some capacity by this? That sixty thousand people didn't faze them? They are human beings with thoughts and feelings. You don't have to like them but you must respect them as human beings.
Don't think for one minute that Mr. Hudson and Mr. Walters don't know what the problem is.
And what the heck did I say to deserve a response like this? Did I question if anyone was a human being? Did I insult you or anyone else?
I think all I was asking is what you were basing your statement on.
Taboo-XX wrote...
So?
I like the character. People are quite a bit more than looks you know. Even if she died her hair back she wouldn't be that character.
This isn't Vertigo.
Taboo-XX wrote...
The problem is lack of closure for most people. That means Love Interests and characters. Had that been in place I seriously doubt a lot of this would have reached the state it is.
People love the characters more than anything else. To not know what happens to them just kills people.
Furthermore the endings do not paint a very positive outlook on the fate of the Universe. If Bioware can paint a brighter future with it they can make people forget the faults.
I can't make you trust me but I assure you that they know damn good and well what the problem is. More than anything I think this is a reality check for them. You never, ever ****** off the audience because they WILL rebel and fight back. The Extended Cut is a compromise whether Bioware will admit it or not. This type of behavior ruins careers where I come from. It won't ruin Mr. Hudson's but I hope it reminds him that the audience matters just as much as the game does. You can NEVER put yourselves above the audience. NO EXCEPTIONS.
People believe that Bioware is going to explain their art to them because we are too stupid to understand it. I understand it just fine. It's the worst narrative execution I've ever seen and they need to know that. They can fix it with a bit more information. No, you won't get a brand new ending but you are most certainly going to have a better one than you have now.
Vertigo_1 wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
So?
I like the character. People are quite a bit more than looks you know. Even if she died her hair back she wouldn't be that character.
This isn't Vertigo.
Taboo-XX wrote...
The problem is lack of closure for most people. That means Love Interests and characters. Had that been in place I seriously doubt a lot of this would have reached the state it is.
Taboo-XX wrote...
Vertigo_1 wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
So?
I like the character. People are quite a bit more than looks you know. Even if she died her hair back she wouldn't be that character.
This isn't Vertigo.
Alfred Hitchcock
James Stewart?
Kim Novak?
You haven't seen it?