Aller au contenu

Photo

A different ascension - the Synthesis compendium (now with EC material integrated)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
9089 réponses à ce sujet

#3201
Shaigunjoe

Shaigunjoe
  • Members
  • 925 messages

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

Shaigunjoe wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...
rabble rabble rabble

You keep referring to the catalyst as the brat and his boys, why?

Good question. :)

Because their cyclical genocides do not deserve any respect. Especially when the brat has chosen to disguise itself as an innocent child to obscure those cyclical atrocities. By doing that it reveals that it is not merely a machine with a faulty AI program, but that it knows exactly how to deceive human beings.


Oh I think I see.  Its just every time I see that I think of the whole Harry Potter thing and how people don't use Voldemort's real name (different reasons, I know, but similiar effect)  It does come across as kind of silly, in both cases.  

I guess the catalyst doesn't come off as a brat to me (unless you pick refuse), and I don't associate any gender specifics with the reapers, if anything I would consider them more toys than boys.

I think the choice of the catalyst being manifested as the image of a child is a thematic choice to underscore the immaturatiy of its rational, and it's inability (after all these years) to grow up.  I do not think it is using the child visage as a means to obscure the atrocities, as it seems rather upfront and apathetic about it.

As to your and Ieldra's debate (I'm sorry if it has moved past it at this point)  I feel like there is a fundamental difference in how both of you see the 'brat and his boys', and all of your arguments are pulled from those base assumptions.  I think it's a debate that will just keep cascading into more tldr's as the amount of conclusions you can extrapolate from either assumption can go on ad nauseum.

Modifié par Shaigunjoe, 11 juillet 2012 - 10:53 .


#3202
lillitheris

lillitheris
  • Members
  • 5 332 messages

Shaigunjoe wrote...

lillitheris wrote...

Shaigunjoe wrote...

Interesting ideas Mobius. Does this whole 'new stuff that wraps around DNA' make anyone think of epigenetics?


Not really, since epigenetics/Lamarckian evolution is seeming like a very real possibility without any “new DNA”. And it certainly wouldn’t make any sense to refer to it as “new DNA”, the Catalyst would just call it epigenetics.


Easy there, nobody mentioned the catalyst.  I was talking about aesthetics of the DNA being 'wrapped' in something, much like how the dermis is wrapped in the epidermis.  You certainly can allued to things without mentioning them specifically.


Given that the Catalyst causes this magic to happen, it’s pretty much implied in whatever you say about Synthesis. You’ll hopefully forgive my cynicism in thinking you were just trying to find another rationalization to latch onto.

And, in case my answer was ambiguous, no, it doesn’t.

The Synthesis epilogue makes me think of a monkey throwing darts at a science dictionary more than anything else.

#3203
Shaigunjoe

Shaigunjoe
  • Members
  • 925 messages

lillitheris wrote...

Shaigunjoe wrote...

lillitheris wrote...

Shaigunjoe wrote...

Interesting ideas Mobius. Does this whole 'new stuff that wraps around DNA' make anyone think of epigenetics?


Not really, since epigenetics/Lamarckian evolution is seeming like a very real possibility without any “new DNA”. And it certainly wouldn’t make any sense to refer to it as “new DNA”, the Catalyst would just call it epigenetics.


Easy there, nobody mentioned the catalyst.  I was talking about aesthetics of the DNA being 'wrapped' in something, much like how the dermis is wrapped in the epidermis.  You certainly can allued to things without mentioning them specifically.


Given that the Catalyst causes this magic to happen, it’s pretty much implied in whatever you say about Synthesis. You’ll hopefully forgive my cynicism in thinking you were just trying to find another rationalization to latch onto.

And, in case my answer was ambiguous, no, it doesn’t.

The Synthesis epilogue makes me think of a monkey throwing darts at a science dictionary more than anything else.


I think you mean inferred, but I do forgive you.

#3204
lillitheris

lillitheris
  • Members
  • 5 332 messages
No, I mean implied.

#3205
Shaigunjoe

Shaigunjoe
  • Members
  • 925 messages

lillitheris wrote...

No, I mean implied.


Oh, that sounds like a personal problem then.

Modifié par Shaigunjoe, 11 juillet 2012 - 11:50 .


#3206
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 182 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

The nature of the Reapers:
About Legion's statement: you are quoting the wrong one. The one I am always referring to in these arguments is here. "Transcended flesh. Billions of organic minds, uploaded and conjoined in an immortal machine body. 'Each a nation'". That's about as clear as things get, don't you think?

Legion followed that sentence by declaring it was speculation:

Legion: We did not "know". It was one hypothesis among many. When Nazara corrupted the heretics, we touched its minds. We perceived they were different from ours, but we could not tell how.

Ieldra2 wrote...

Shepard's role in the Synthesis vs. Reaperization:
(1) There is no mention of dispersal in the way the Reaperized species are "processed".
(2) In one case it's a Reaper who does it, in the other it's the Crucible. The Crucible was not built by the Reapers.
==> Your equating of the Reaperization process with Shepard's personality dissemination for Synthesis is methodically flawed.
This invalidates your first line of arguments about the nature of the Reapers. You have, thus, not invalidated my point.

Shepard: Explain how my energy can be added to the Crucible.

Child: Your organic energy, the essence of who you are and what you are, will be broken down and then dispersed.

There would be no reason to sacrifice Shepard if that did not have any impact. Obviously the quarians do not grow five toes and the krogans do not lose their hump.

Again, the brat's dialogue, the beam which adds Shepard's organic energy to the beam, and Shepards sacrifice to add that essence are enough proof. It's all pretty obvious to me. It cannot be denied.

Here is an interesting one: The brat also seems to know a lot about the Crucible. As a perfect tour guide it is able to give lots of details about its working, though. And it is certainly very interested in explaining why synthesis is the ideal solution and inevitable. But there is one thing it didn't mention, but which is shown in the cinematic. Let me give you a hint: Compare the three choice activations and watch what happens to the brat in any of these. Two of them have an interesting close up of the brat. The synthesis one does not have such a close-up. But keep your eyes on the brat as long as you can. See what happens? Or actually, did you see what didn't happen?

And about your essence used to store the minds of the harvested race. See my reply at the top of this post. Legion invalidates his own take on it.

Ieldra2 wrote...

As for the second one further down in your long post, that may be somewhat plausible, but let me rephrase what you're saying here: "I cannot imagine that I would not want to die in that situation, so I feel perfectly justified in killing someone else in that situation without asking and without *any* knowledge of how that situation feels from within." I'm sorry, but that doesn't work for me. I have a good imagination, but I also know its limitations. Apart from that, whatever the Reapers are they are valid life forms. The claim that "nothing is lost" is false. "Nothing of value"? Perhaps, but value is something you add. I have a different perspective.

No. Please don't rephrase me. ;) Let me rephrase it.

When I, in the case of AFW and not as Shepard, think about my existence here then I think about my family, my friends, the city that love, my work, my views about society, the goals I want to reach, the hangovers and the great day before, etc., etc. If I am to be harvested in the way ME2 portrays then I am squeezed alive to goo and die. Now assume that what you say is true and the essence of me survives in a reaper mind. Not only will everything I know be there as memories, but at the same time everything I know will be taken away from me. I will never be able to eat at my sister's on Thursdays. I will never be able to eat with my friend on Fridays and talk until the birds start singing. I will never be able to visit the Vondelpark and sit in the sunshine. I will never be able to finish that project at work which I gave all I've got. I will never be able to dance to Cosmic Slop while the sub-woofer is drying my hair. By now you'll get the picture. All of that is lost forever. I will be in a prison. Never be able to do those things again or finish what I've started. Never be free. What made me me is gone. The quality of my life would have approached zero. I rather die than live in such a prison forever. I don't want that to happen to anyone. Get me out of that nightmare. Please pull the plug.

Now. If that happens before the 3 options then I think lots of harvested minds will riot, grieve, etc., inside that reaper body. However, we do not see that happen. So, I assume there is some kind of control, imposed by the owning reaper. And after synthesis, that control either continues or has been replaced by whatever forces the utopia to be happy. If there is no such control then the hell starts again forever. Reapers don't die, so I assume those harvested minds are kept alive as well.

And the "nothing is really lost" reference has to do with knowledge. There I am describing the alternative which I believe is the actual situation. There is no essence of their minds that is preserved. In my view only the race's knowledge is preserved. It has no life and is abstract. And thus nothing can be really lost when you destroy the knowledge in that reaper. In time knowledge can be replaced when that is destroyed.

No matter what method. It is still genocide.

Well, now that I am writing anyway (and it seems you are finally interested) there is also the case of the reapers themselves. Each reaper has its own core AI. As such it is no different than a synthetic. And when that reaper gains the same awareness as EDI's "I'm alive" then it also has the understanding of organics, just like EDI. It will *know* what cyclical atrocities it has inflicted. If it there is no mind control in utopia then I cannot predict what it would do, but if I was that reaper, I would know I was guilty of the genocide of an entire race and that I was used as a war machine to commit other atrocities. I think I would rather die. However, if what you say is true and the harvested minds really have awareness, I would also know that it would kill the harvested minds inside me. That's a problem I cannot even see the implications of. It would drive me mad.

Reapers better have some kind of mind control to keep them sane. The same goes for the aware harvested minds inside it.

So, no matter what angle I look at it, it is better to destroy the reapers.

Ieldra2 wrote...

Moral responsibility:
You have asked me: "Could you live with yourself once you've discovered that you were responsible for countless genocides?" (1) I have no idea and I hope that I'll never find out. I also know that I cannot know how I would act from this side of the fence. I claim that neither do you know that about yourself! Ah, and there's the additional problem: Had I been mind-controlled I would not have been responsible. (2) The Reapers are not you or me, judging them by human standards may be problematic.
(2) can also be used against my original claim of course. But there's this difference: I claim that it's implausible that ALL Reapers would follow the Catalyst if they're avatars of civilizations without being compelled. You claim that's implausible for ANY Reaper not to kill itself after becoming aware of what it's responsible for. I maintain that some Reapers would not follow the Catalyst were they not compelled, and I concede that some Reapers might kill themselves. I reject all generalizing claims in these matters that treat the Reapers as a unified force without an explanation about why they are unified. Reapers have personalities, why shouldn't they have preferences?

I've tried to give you my views about what I think above. Your view presents an interesting thought experiment. ;)

I also claim that reapers are not tools before the end of the game. That has to do with them being those super-intelligent AIs. So, an uncontrolled reaper must have free will. The lore says that they are controlled by the brat before the ending. What implications does that have?

Talking about speculations and reaper personalities: Is there an equivalent of indoctrination for their core AI? And if so, how do these two fight each other? Have there been reapers that rebelled? That is pure speculation on my part of course, but it seems unlikely that there wasn't at least one. It is not something I can ever prove, nor something that I intend to. It is just a thought that crossed my mind while playing ME.

Also, Harbinger makes that intriguing sound. It either says "Serve Us" or "Save us". That's the closest I got to it. It doesn't mean a thing, but it is somewhere in the back of my mind. ;)

Like Sabrina, a poster famous for her disclaimers, would say: That's of course my view.

Have fun. ;)

Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 12 juillet 2012 - 01:10 .


#3207
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Shaigunjoe wrote...

What is the tweet you were referencing?


but the idea is there is no concept of machine or organic anymore. There is only life.


I won't go rooting for it, but that's the tweet, verbatim. I made a Synthesis thread long long ago talking about this.

At that time, Synthesis removed the distinction between man and machine, but now we are...one giant organism in the EC.

There is no distinction...that is visible, but it is at a very basic level. You remain an individual, but not as a species. 

There is just life.

COOL BEANS RIGHT?

#3208
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 182 messages

Shaigunjoe wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

Shaigunjoe wrote...

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

rabble rabble rabble

You keep referring to the catalyst as the brat and his boys, why?

Good question. :)

Because their cyclical genocides do not deserve any respect. Especially when the brat has chosen to disguise itself as an innocent child to obscure those cyclical atrocities. By doing that it reveals that it is not merely a machine with a faulty AI program, but that it knows exactly how to deceive human beings.

Oh I think I see.  Its just every time I see that I think of the whole Harry Potter thing and how people don't use Voldemort's real name (different reasons, I know, but similiar effect)  It does come across as kind of silly, in both cases.  

I guess the catalyst doesn't come off as a brat to me (unless you pick refuse), and I don't associate any gender specifics with the reapers, if anything I would consider them more toys than boys.

I think the choice of the catalyst being manifested as the image of a child is a thematic choice to underscore the immaturatiy of its rational, and it's inability (after all these years) to grow up.  I do not think it is using the child visage as a means to obscure the atrocities, as it seems rather upfront and apathetic about it.

See what you did there yourself? You assume an "immaturity of its rationale" because it looks like a child. It almost feels like a defense. I rather keep the brat responsible for its actions.

#3209
Shaigunjoe

Shaigunjoe
  • Members
  • 925 messages

AngryFrozenWater wrote...
See what you did there yourself? You assume an "immaturity of its rationale" because it looks like a child. It almost feels like a defense. I rather keep the brat responsible for its actions.


I specifically did say thematic choice, but I guess I could have worded it a littler clearer to avoid confusion.  I should have said the immaturity of the rational instead of its, just speaking of Lovecraft horrors in general.  I would agree that an "immaturity of its rationale" would be a poor defense for its actions, so it would not really absolve the catalyst of anything.

It's kind of funny, the "immaturity of its rational" is not that much different from you calling it 'brat'.  I'm targeting childish fear, while you seem more fixated on childish....petulance?  I'd say fear is the bigger problem.

Modifié par Shaigunjoe, 12 juillet 2012 - 03:02 .


#3210
Shaigunjoe

Shaigunjoe
  • Members
  • 925 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Shaigunjoe wrote...

What is the tweet you were referencing?


but the idea is there is no concept of machine or organic anymore. There is only life.


I won't go rooting for it, but that's the tweet, verbatim. I made a Synthesis thread long long ago talking about this.

At that time, Synthesis removed the distinction between man and machine, but now we are...one giant organism in the EC.

There is no distinction...that is visible, but it is at a very basic level. You remain an individual, but not as a species. 

There is just life.

COOL BEANS RIGHT?


Haha, yea, oh twitter.  Shame on Mr. Gamble, he should have known better to even attempt an explanation in 140 character bursts.

I don't think the there is just life comment is entirely without merit.  If you look at the taxonomic ranking system you will see that life is at the top, while species is at the very bottom.  Under the current regime, there is no room for synthetics in the taxonomy rank and file, I guess after synthesis there is.

#3211
RiouHotaru

RiouHotaru
  • Members
  • 4 059 messages
It's not a bad explanation though. With the barrier of difference removed between the two, suddenly they ARE more similar.

#3212
Shaigunjoe

Shaigunjoe
  • Members
  • 925 messages

RebelReya wrote...
We were calling him Star-Jar for awhile, very applicible nickname as well, if you get the star wars refrance.


Yea, the parallels there are clear, there is more than one franchise where a single character ruins the whole thing for some people.

Modifié par Shaigunjoe, 12 juillet 2012 - 03:21 .


#3213
His Name was HYR!!

His Name was HYR!!
  • Members
  • 9 145 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

but the idea is there is no concept of machine or organic anymore. There is only life.


I won't go rooting for it, but that's the tweet, verbatim. I made a Synthesis thread long long ago talking about this.

At that time, Synthesis removed the distinction between man and machine, but now we are...one giant organism in the EC.

There is no distinction...that is visible, but it is at a very basic level. You remain an individual, but not as a species. 

There is just life.

COOL BEANS RIGHT?


1.) The premise of synthetics being life unto themselves, before synthesis, is highly debateable. Its not canon. You can play ME3 and have Shepard say flat-out that he doesn't believe synthetics are life.

2.) The quote "no concept of machine or organic" to me means that both are now capable of the same things. This is not a groundbreaking revelation, EDI says something about the same in the epilogue about a disappearing line between organic and synthetic.

What you're (in)capable of is a quality of what you are, but it does not constitute what you are. Sharing qualities makes things similar, but not the same. It would be like calling talc and calcite the same thing because both are hard and maybe the same color. But that would overlook many other distinct qualities they do not share.

(And that is how people make generalizations of groups).

#3214
Dr. Doctor

Dr. Doctor
  • Members
  • 4 331 messages
I sort of work with the idea that Synthesis is sort of the answer to the Geth's "Does this unit have a soul?" question. The Catalyst description of "organic energy" being "the essence of who and what you are" sounds a lot like a soul to me.

Organics gaining the ability to understand synthetics makes me think of David Archer's ability to communicate with the Geth. When Legion tells Shepard that the Geth convey information using a mathematical language he finds it incredibly foreign and hard to comprehend. Perhaps Synthesis gives organic individuals to communicate with Synthetics in a manner similar to David.

#3215
lillitheris

lillitheris
  • Members
  • 5 332 messages

Dr. Doctor wrote...

I sort of work with the idea that Synthesis is sort of the answer to the Geth's "Does this unit have a soul?" question. The Catalyst description of "organic energy" being "the essence of who and what you are" sounds a lot like a soul to me.


Except for the part where this happened before Synthesis, once again proving its complete gratuitousness.

#3216
dbkkk

dbkkk
  • Members
  • 99 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...
Uh. Everyone is now one species. You "understand" the other person. You "understand" Synthetics.

So....to understand someone it is now necessary to be of the same species? Since when? I see different species in the epilogues. As different from each other as they were before.


Yeah the term "species" has been getting massacred on this thread.

So if empathy implies same species does the converse hold true?
I.e. not having empathy with someone means you are not the same species?
If that is true that would explain why I never had much empathy for my siblings.
We aren't in fact the same species!

#3217
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
@AngryFrozenWater:

About Shepard and the beam:

I do not deny that Shepard's personality is disseminated in the beam. I deny that the Reaperization process is in any way similar. There is nothing to connect one to the other.

About the nature of the Reapers:
OK, so Legion's statement was speculation. Unfortunate. I don't think it's really invalidated as an argument, though. The hypothesis still has weight because it fits well with some other pieces of information, like the need for whole individuals to make a Reaper instead of just cloned DNA samples - and as a storytelling element it has more weight because we are given this one instead of one of the other hypotheses the geth had made about the Reapers' nature. Nonetheless, I won't use it anymore because there are different pieces of information with which it doesn't appear to fit so well, like the Catalyst's line about what is harvested.

The picture I see emerging is this: the writers went out of their way to avoid giving away hard evidence about the nature of the Reapers. Here are some other hard-to-reconcile statements:

"I control the Reapers" vs "I embody the collective intelligence of all Reapers"
"We helped them ascend" vs "We harvest your knowledge, your creations....."

Perhaps that's as it should be. But it means we can circle around each other with our arguments and never come to a conclusion because there is conflicting information. Or this was written deliberately to illustrate a reality we aren't equipped to understand. This, btw, applies also your assertions as to how an existence as a Reaper would feel, considering that a Reaper may be many but is also one. I don't think you can make such assertions with confidence, even if there is continuity of identity, since there is a totally new mental environment. Different SF works have been exploring similar things with drastically different premises. Just think about this: is the horrific nature of the Reaperization process intended as an indication of what's in for those uploaded minds should they continue to exist and feel, or is it meant to be a distraction from the reality, an indication of nothing more than that the mind behind it doesn't think as we do? I've always felt the over-the-top horror in the ME games was a distraction, that we were called to look beyond it, and I feel vindicated in that belief by the subversion of the "Lovecraftian horror" aspect of the Reapers in the end.

I would like to add that nothing in the last paragraph should be construed as denying that what the Catalyst and its Reaper army did was genocide. It was. What I do deny is that the way the Reapers came into existence makes them "abominations", things that should not exist. I do not accept any normative statements about which things should or should not exist. The creation process of a life form does not detract of its validity as a life form once it does exist. There are people who think genetic engineering is immoral, but even they wouldn't kill Miranda. Most of them wouldn't, anyway. Hopefully.

Also, my point about Reaper mind control still stands: even if a Reaper has just collective characteristics of a species (it has to have at least that for the whole process to make any sense), it is implausible that ten thousand Reapers would follow the Catalyst without fail without being compelled. Such a scenario may actually make Synthesis less complicated to explain. That we don't see any rogue Reapers in Synthesis (which I agree would probably exist) doesn't say more than this isn't a problem big enough to impact the general image of a good future, just as the absence of people who still want to kill the Reapers (who I would also expect to exist) in both Control and Synthesis doesn't say anything more than that. 

(more speculation about the nature of the Reapers later.)

#3218
Chashan

Chashan
  • Members
  • 1 654 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

@Chashan:
What I meant about Synthesis is not making all the "good" decisions may result in a less stereotypical "sunshine and rainbows" scenario. It's easy for me to do because I think in roleplaying terms, sabotaging the cure is the only sane decision.

BTW, that wasn't a particularly Renegade-y playthrough. Sabotaging the cure is the only "bad" decision I make in my personal canon playthroughs. Perhaps I'll reconsider from a metagaming viewpoint, since the epilogue tells me curing it will turn out well, but I'm fundamentally opposed to the idea that all can have as many children as they want if that does damage on a bigger scale. That also applies to present-day Earth but that's a different question.

Edit:
It isn't speculation that Synthesis eventually cures the genophage. You get a different slide with a krogan child even if you sabotaged the cure, with EDI telling that even those "shattered cultures" will eventually live free of poverty and disease (!). What I like about this scenario is that there is no mention of galactic peace.


In that case, knowing that eventually someone will do away with that instrument of infanticide, I do hope that you do.
At any rate, keeping the genophage in place is one of the things I will not even do on a more renegade-y playthrough of the series I might attempt at some point.

Just recently, for science's sake, I elected to have an actual look at Director's Cut versions of Synthesis and Control and...no offense, but I found the visuals and content of Green to be just plain abhorrent, about the only thing that came close to moving me was EDI hugging the LI(? due to Jack appearing in the flashback), Ashley, but beyond that, it was...not good, as I mentioned.
Having said that, the Reapers_are_seamlessly integrated into the community, rebuilding things, as much is stated in the epilogue. It was a "good" Green, admittedly, but I doubt there is a specific difference between that and the other, now is there? Do excuse that I am not willing to dig up the alternate version of it...
Then "some problems" does not necessarily mean war. Indeed, it just may mean more debate, identity crises which are no real obstacle to lasting peace.

In short: my own personal experience of it tells me that the Green utopia definitely is the ending choice I will pass on. Control also has its amount of creepi- and silliness - run away husks! - but at least it is a good sort of creepy, one I might consider rolling a die for on a Mr Renegado Shepard-runthrough I was thinking of doing, with Destroy and Refusal being the other two options.

#3219
Mobius-Silent

Mobius-Silent
  • Members
  • 651 messages

AngryFrozenWater wrote...

In the geth consensus Legion has chosen how things look. Just to make Shepard comfortable in that for humans alien environment. Legion is very clear about that. Shepard even jokes about the weapon.


Incorrect, Legion created an interface so that it was _possible_ for Shepard to interpret the information visually, the only things that Legion _chose_ the aperance of were the things it created (It's own avatar and the weapon) the rest was simply given visual form by shepards mind. I'm pretty sure the interaction with the Catalyst is the same principle, the Catalyst provided nothing for Shepard's mind to use so it picked the last representation of Shepard's fear-of-the-unknown, the child from his dreams.

#3220
Mobius-Silent

Mobius-Silent
  • Members
  • 651 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Uh. Everyone is now one species. You "understand" the other person. You "understand" Synthetics. You have created the blue prints for a utopia, whether you like it or not.


Nowhere does it say everyone is the same species. The differenced in DNA still exist, it's just that the DNA is also wrapped in the synthetic parts which are common across all forms of life.

The "understanding" comes from empathy, which comes from a stable base of emotional capability facilitate by the new framework for synthetics, nothing more.

The Reapers and the Catalyst (and the previous AI's) had no empathy, they were Sapient but not Sentient.

Taboo-XX wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

@Taboo:
All life on Earth is based on DNA. Are we all the same species?


We are all ONE giant super organism in Synthesis.

With seperate personalities.

I am the eggman, they are they eggmen.

Essentially.

 

You are mistaken.

Modifié par Mobius-Silent, 12 juillet 2012 - 01:23 .


#3221
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

Mobius-Silent wrote...

Nowhere does it say everyone is the same species. The differenced in DNA still exist, it's just that the DNA is also wrapped in the synthetic parts which are common across all forms of life.


How can a species, like the Geth, that do not have any physical body, have DNA of any kind in the first place?

Modifié par Xandurpein, 12 juillet 2012 - 02:08 .


#3222
His Name was HYR!!

His Name was HYR!!
  • Members
  • 9 145 messages

lillitheris wrote...

Dr. Doctor wrote...

I sort of work with the idea that Synthesis is sort of the answer to the Geth's "Does this unit have a soul?" question. The Catalyst description of "organic energy" being "the essence of who and what you are" sounds a lot like a soul to me.


Except for the part where this happened before Synthesis, once again proving its complete gratuitousness.


Shepard: it's advanced, but calling it life?
Legion: we evolved!
Shepard: you were upgraded.

It didn't happen before. Not for fact.

#3223
lillitheris

lillitheris
  • Members
  • 5 332 messages

HYR 2.0 wrote...

lillitheris wrote...

Dr. Doctor wrote...

I sort of work with the idea that Synthesis is sort of the answer to the Geth's "Does this unit have a soul?" question. The Catalyst description of "organic energy" being "the essence of who and what you are" sounds a lot like a soul to me.


Except for the part where this happened before Synthesis, once again proving its complete gratuitousness.


Shepard: it's advanced, but calling it life?
Legion: we evolved!
Shepard: you were upgraded.

It didn't happen before. Not for fact.


Sure it did. Does this unit have a soul?

I suppose it makes Destroy a whole lot easier if you don’t consider the geth to be people.

#3224
Guest_Flog61_*

Guest_Flog61_*
  • Guests

Xandurpein wrote...

Mobius-Silent wrote...

Nowhere does it say everyone is the same species. The differenced in DNA still exist, it's just that the DNA is also wrapped in the synthetic parts which are common across all forms of life.


How can a species, like the Geth, that do not have any physical body, have DNA of any kind in the first place?


Don't worry, the synthesis guys just ignore this question since it disproves it.

They also ignore the fact that new synthetics could still be made, and so alll organic life would still be exstinguished eventually.

They also ignore the fact that there is no reaon why it would make people's eyes glow; there is no evolutionary benefit to this, since they do not live 50 miles under sea level

#3225
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
Yes. A forced empathy. Forced understanding. This is why people get upset. You understand the other person because additions have been made to you. Did you know that manipulation of genetic coding on a mass scale is considered genocide by international law. No?

The only thing missing from the Synthesis ending is John Lennon's Imagine, which would make it unbearable, and I love that song.