Aller au contenu

Photo

A different ascension - the Synthesis compendium (now with EC material integrated)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
9089 réponses à ce sujet

#6826
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 022 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Obadiah wrote...
I looked at Synthesis as an exponential increase to the power-of-one. Technology currently gets more and more miniaturized so as to make it more portable and easy to use. We're doing it with communication and computing power now, but I think it will get that way with transport as well.

I think the Relays will probably be fixed just to get galactic commerce and civilization back on track, but they will eventually be left behind, along with the need for big vehicles for personal transport. We'll be be in, to refer to my old comics, ROM: Space Knight and Silver Surfer (Green Lantern?) territory.

Individuals with the proper tech integration and space suits will be able to generate personal Mass Effect fields so powerful that they will be able to just zip through space on their own. Imagine Iron Man, but with to ability to fly across the galaxy.

I see our visions go into the same direction. The difference is I don't want to go quite that far into comic-book territory, if only because it becomes increasingly more difficult to rationalize the science. Hyper-advanced ME-style transportation has the potential to turn into an "unlimited FTL" scenario, and that's boring. Among other things, that's why I make the technology small by need and leave the relays destroyed. So, small starships and eventually technologically upgraded individuals will be able to make spacetime jumps, but transportation of bulk goods by relay-like jump technology remains uneconomical or even impossible. Civilization will have to rely on non-jump FTL for that, which will increase travel times for large ships to months and years. I want to keep space big.


I was always under the impression that the relays were ran by keepers, maintained by them. So that would have much to do how and when the relays would become functional. The catalyst was thurough when designing it's lures, kept those relays self maintained.

I've never heard of anyone but keepers ever being on one of those?

#6827
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
I have no idea what you're talking about. This is was about how we envision the post-Synthesis future. The relays are heavily damaged (see the relay husk in Destroy) as the result of using the Crucible in all three endings and the question was would they be rebuilt in a post-Synthesis future or would they be left behind as a relic of the age gone by as new and more elegant ways to travel between the starts are found.

Also, we see the Reapers rebuilding a relay in Control. Any automated repair systems have most likely been destroyed. Also, the Keepers are never said to exist on mass relays, just on the CIadel.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 13 février 2013 - 05:52 .


#6828
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 022 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

I have no idea what you're talking about. This is was about how we envision the post-Synthesis future. The relays are heavily damaged (see the relay husk in Destroy) as the result of using the Crucible in all three endings and the question was would they be rebuilt in a post-Synthesis future or would they be left behind as a relic of the age gone by as new and more elegant ways to travel between the starts are found.

Also, we see the Reapers rebuilding a relay in Control. Any automated repair systems have most likely been destroyed. Also, the Keepers are never said to exist on mass relays, just on the CIadel.


I would say, (after getting chewed ;), that the relays would be saved in any event, as they're consistent with the survival of the MEU. The main reason for picking synthesis.
 
I'm deferring the hard work to the synthesis compendium to you, Ieldra2. I only constested the idea of ascenion as integral to it. The reaperships considered harvest as ascension, Saren considered 'molding' with the reaperships being acceptable, but that's not synthesis. And, even TIM thought of being able to control the reapers as being a reaper as acceptable, to gain their knowledge as mostly power. That's what the detractor use as faux-lore arguements against synthesis.

I'm going to go research my assumption on the keepers, but I'm obsessed with those pesky critter anyways. And I've often wondered why they never permited exploration of the relays for the fun of it. They are huge and interesting widgets in space..lol 

#6829
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages

Wayning_Star wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

I have no idea what you're talking about. This is was about how we envision the post-Synthesis future. The relays are heavily damaged (see the relay husk in Destroy) as the result of using the Crucible in all three endings and the question was would they be rebuilt in a post-Synthesis future or would they be left behind as a relic of the age gone by as new and more elegant ways to travel between the starts are found.

Also, we see the Reapers rebuilding a relay in Control. Any automated repair systems have most likely been destroyed. Also, the Keepers are never said to exist on mass relays, just on the CIadel.


I would say, (after getting chewed ;), that the relays would be saved in any event, as they're consistent with the survival of the MEU. The main reason for picking synthesis.

???
The evidence disproves your assertion. The choice which canonically saves the relay system is Control. In Synthesis, the fate of the relays is a complete unknown.

I'm deferring the hard work to the synthesis compendium to you, Ieldra2. I only constested the idea of ascenion as integral to it. The reaperships considered harvest as ascension, Saren considered 'molding' with the reaperships being acceptable, but that's not synthesis.

You're accepting the Reaper definition monopoly over the concept of ascension, and thus are buying into their propaganda if you say that. In the context discussed, "ascension" is any process of minds overcoming a significant structural limitation to acquire greater cognitive ability, simliar to the effects of a technological singularity on machine intelligence. Watch the Synthesis epilogue. What EDI says at its end, that's the path to an ascension. It is unknown what the results may be, but it's definitely a theme in Sythesis.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 13 février 2013 - 08:54 .


#6830
humes spork

humes spork
  • Members
  • 3 338 messages
So, should I throw in my Hegelian argument here also?

Also, brewing up another synthesis argument I might plop on the threads soon. This time, Habermas, discourse ethics, and communicative rationality! As soon as I get over whatever hellspawned, nemesis, flying pig AIDS living testament to my own mortality I've contracted this week.

Modifié par humes spork, 13 février 2013 - 08:45 .


#6831
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
Sure, shoot. I'm curious (about both, since I don't think I've read your Hegelian argument), but I can't for the hell of it imagine how you'd connect Habermas with ME3's Synthesis.

#6832
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 022 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Wayning_Star wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

I have no idea what you're talking about. This is was about how we envision the post-Synthesis future. The relays are heavily damaged (see the relay husk in Destroy) as the result of using the Crucible in all three endings and the question was would they be rebuilt in a post-Synthesis future or would they be left behind as a relic of the age gone by as new and more elegant ways to travel between the starts are found.

Also, we see the Reapers rebuilding a relay in Control. Any automated repair systems have most likely been destroyed. Also, the Keepers are never said to exist on mass relays, just on the CIadel.


I would say, (after getting chewed ;), that the relays would be saved in any event, as they're consistent with the survival of the MEU. The main reason for picking synthesis.

???
The evidence disproves your assertion. The choice which canonically saves the relay system is Control. In Synthesis, the fate of the relays is a complete unknown.


I'm deferring the hard work to the synthesis compendium to you, Ieldra2. I only constested the idea of ascenion as integral to it. The reaperships considered harvest as ascension, Saren considered 'molding' with the reaperships being acceptable, but that's not synthesis.

You're accepting the Reaper definition monopoly over the concept of ascension, and thus are buying into their propaganda if you say that. In the context discussed, "ascension" is any process of minds overcoming a significant structural limitation to acquire greater cognitive ability, simliar to the effects of a technological singularity on machine intelligence. Watch the Synthesis epilogue. What EDI says at its end, that's the path to an ascension. It is unknown what the results may be, but it's definitely a theme in Sythesis.


no, control saves nothing more,even if we buy into the clip denotation, and is dependant on mil strength and the condition of the crucible/quality of contruction. Shep becomes a reaper. Ideally, destroy would necessitate complete destruction of ALL reaper tech, as it's associated with life giving properties, otherwise humans would of had an Edi way before discovering the relays and the tech to utilize them. As the now trusted catalyst proclaims, the reapers will return as a product of the chaos. Nature taking it's course, from the Cat's perspective. As far as the relay destruction in synthesis, it never mattered to me,as the force of the extreme of synthesis precluded any concern for those, as transportation is less a priority, to me anyway.

The nature of synthesis in my view and often a view distorted by presumption of 'nature AS being a living entity, differentiating common knowledge from predisposed view. Mine is that that the function of synthesis is the tayloring of nature as a whole. Not ascending to some higher being,eventhough that seems like it's what happens. We literally tweek nature to synthesise it into another form, altered from what is to what will be with 'apparent' intellectual aspects of naturalized syntethic life. Even plantlife is altered to reflect it's NEW synthetic character,hense the circuits.(a clumsy way to project that in the slides, but thats game mechanics and user friendly representation.) So, in my view, synthesis actually, in changing it's base structure to include synthetic life along with organic life as if nature its self provided this option from it's beginnings. Kind of a cheat code for the natural order of things. In a way it's the opposite of transhumanism, as humanity is altered, but the very basis of transhumanism relies on that humans are augumented by technology, in sythesis, nature and techology both augumented by each other. Takes the concept of transhumanism out of the picture, as the bias is eliminated.

My new (head canon) problem with it all is that I've figured out that the catalyst is probably wrought from organics, instead of pure technology,as in computerized circuitry. The Levi used thralls to design and built the intelligence, shackled it through indoctrination and that eventually, as the intelligence grew(more powerful) over time, overcame its shackle and did the very same thing to it's creator,harvested them. The catalyst describes its self as an inorganic organic, to Shepard when asked if it were a machine/AI. A double jepordy question for sure.

In any event, that intelligence copies it's creators ways and means to an end, thus becoming,for the most part, the chaos it was designed to resolve. This all complicates the ideal of the catalyst, it's function and it's actual motives within the structure of the MEU and it's problems and resolution/solution. Might even be why the synthesis choice is provided, as we don't know who authored those choices...

#6833
humes spork

humes spork
  • Members
  • 3 338 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Sure, shoot. I'm curious (about both, since I don't think I've read your Hegelian argument), but I can't for the hell of it imagine how you'd connect Habermas with ME3's Synthesis.

In a sentence, synthesis represents the establishment of principle U, whereas prior what used to be distinctly organic and synthetic, for the history of organic/synthetic relations and the context of "individual" experience, could not form a basis for rational communication.

Modifié par humes spork, 13 février 2013 - 11:03 .


#6834
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages

humes spork wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

Sure, shoot. I'm curious (about both, since I don't think I've read your Hegelian argument), but I can't for the hell of it imagine how you'd connect Habermas with ME3's Synthesis.

In a sentence, synthesis represents the establishment of principle U, whereas prior what used to be distinctly organic and synthetic, for the history of organic/synthetic relations and the context of "individual" experience, could not form a basis for rational communication.

LOL, I wouldn't have thought to make that connection. So, if I understand you correctly, the main problem between organics and synthetics was that reasonable discourse could not be etablished between them, which prevented the emergence of an ethical framework acceptable to both sides?

(I had been writing something more about this but found it needs more reflection. I'll get back to this later. At this point, I would like to draw attention to the frequent inability to establish reasonable discourse between organics, while between synthetics, or between reasonable organics and synthetics, there does not appear to be such a difficulty)

@Wayning_Star:
I am unable to decipher your ramblings into a coherent line of thought. Would you care to rephrase?

Modifié par Ieldra2, 14 février 2013 - 09:18 .


#6835
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
In other threads, there have been questions again about how synthesized civilizations will deal with non-synthesized ones. I cannot answer that question, but here are a few relevant bits of information and speculation:

(1) It is not clear if Synthesis will affect literally the whole galaxy, or just the areas around the mass relays. My favored interpretation would be the latter, for reasons of common sense.

(2) It can be considered inevitable that non-synthesized synthetic life will come to exist again. If you use my Synthesis interpretation, that will not necessarily be a problem since the synthesized civilization is in no danger of being surpassed by them. The main point of Synthesis, in my interpretation, is to remove the possibility of synthetics surpassing organics, the reason why future conflicts would have a high probability of resulting in extinction.

(3) The fate of non-synthesized *organic* civilizations is much more of a problem since they are in the same position with regard to synthesized civilizations as organics of earlier cycles have been with regard to synthetics, with the only difference that there is no creator/created relationship. The possibility that non-synthesized organic civilization will be synthesized, absorbed or destroyed cannot be discounted. What will happen in every case is likely to be influenced by the ethical norms post-Synthesis civilization develops for itself. In my opinion, it is not possible to foresee the result. It can be anything between a "prime directive" protecting emerging civilizations and a general policy of "get synthesized or get destroyed".

Modifié par Ieldra2, 14 février 2013 - 07:32 .


#6836
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
So....the new topic: there has been an opinion posted in other threads that Synthesis is optional on the individual level, based on the Catalyst's statement that it cannot be forced.

Auld Wulf, if you read this, could you explain how this is possible, given the Catalyst's following statement in the Synthesis exposition:

"The energy of the Crucible, released in this way, will alter the matrix of all organic life in the galaxy"?

I can see no way to reconcile this statement with the statement that Synthesis is optional on an individual level. If you can, please explain, since I would like such a scenario. The closest I can come to that is to say that Synthesis gives you a tool, to realize self-improvements you want. You have a choice about what you do with that tool, you can even ignore it altogether, which would enable you to live as you've always done, but the tool itself is not optional since it's built into your body. You may be able to get rid of it eventually, but at the moment of Synthesis you are changed. Period. That, btw, has been my interpretation since day one.

So, I would really like to get out of the ethical conundrum, but I can't see how it is possible given the statement above. As I see it, the Catalyst's line "It cannot be forced" means that *it* cannot force Synthesis on the galaxy, it needs the willing input of an organic individual. Or it can mean that organic civilization must reach a certain technological and/or cultural state of advancement before Synthesis can work. It cannot be forced on a civilization before its time. The statement "they were not ready" appears to support this interpretation. Any other interpretation would result in a contradiction.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 16 février 2013 - 08:10 .


#6837
clennon8

clennon8
  • Members
  • 2 163 messages
I honestly think Auld Wulf is trolling with that nonsense, plain and simple.

Just for the sake of argument, though, let's say that individuals can opt out. How does an optional Synthesis solve the problem?

#6838
Obadiah

Obadiah
  • Members
  • 5 773 messages
I think the devs added Synthesis as some sort of tech-magic prize for everyone that achieved a high enough EMS, but I just think we players and fans have considered and dissected it WAY more than they ever did.

And that vexes me.

#6839
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 022 messages

Obadiah wrote...

I think the devs added Synthesis as some sort of tech-magic prize for everyone that achieved a high enough EMS, but I just think we players and fans have considered and dissected it WAY more than they ever did.

And that vexes me.


We've been harvested..lol

#6840
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 022 messages
and now part of the bioware reapership brain..bwahahahahah!!

#6841
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 022 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

So....the new topic: there has been an opinion posted in other threads that Synthesis is optional on the individual level, based on the Catalyst's statement that it cannot be forced.

Auld Wulf, if you read this, could you explain how this is possible, given the Catalyst's following statement in the Synthesis exposition:

"The energy of the Crucible, released in this way, will alter the matrix of all organic life in the galaxy"?

I can see no way to reconcile this statement with the statement that Synthesis is optional on an individual level. If you can, please explain, since I would like such a scenario. The closest I can come to that is to say that Synthesis gives you a tool, to realize self-improvements you want. You have a choice about what you do with that tool, you can even ignore it altogether, which would enable you to live as you've always done, but the tool itself is not optional since it's built into your body. You may be able to get rid of it eventually, but at the moment of Synthesis you are changed. Period. That, btw, has been my interpretation since day one.

So, I would really like to get out of the ethical conundrum, but I can't see how it is possible given the statement above. As I see it, the Catalyst's line "It cannot be forced" means that *it* cannot force Synthesis on the galaxy, it needs the willing input of an organic individual. Or it can mean that organic civilization must reach a certain technological and/or cultural state of advancement before Synthesis can work. It cannot be forced on a civilization before its time. The statement "they were not ready" appears to support this interpretation. Any other interpretation would result in a contradiction.


like anything the body doesn't accept, it can be and probably would be 'rejected'. Synthesis is more of an idealogical trans mutation, if 'mutation' can be used in this context? The whole story relates to how 'the mind' controls 'the body' as the MEU is the body and Shep et al, is the mind.

The catalyst for change is the methodology via the Leviathan 'intelligence' as a motivator of 'the mind'.(needs based)

simplistic I know.. The levi being apex 'mind' never give up..by the way..lol (it's in their genes, as it were,and by just meeting up with them and their toys will alter the MEU forever, in any event, it's 'enevitable'.)

and so much for 'choice'...Posted Image

#6842
Nimrodell

Nimrodell
  • Members
  • 829 messages
Ieldra, sorry for interrupting your line of thought - but think you'll actually need this info for some future discussions. Organics vs synthetics theme (without reapers) is actually not something that just popped in in ME3... even I forgot about the side quest and the lines from ME1. Remember that rogue AI side quest from the Citadel, when u track the funneling of credits starting from the Flux Club? Well, when you finally reach that AI and if you tell it something like, this doesn't have to end with violence - it just simply states the theme from ME3 - organics will always try just to destroy or control the synthetics... and strangely, those are the basic choices any player gets at the end of ME3. No matter how much you try to convince that Citadel rogue AI that you don't want to kill it, it won't believe you. Somehow, I think this is important for your further discussions.

#6843
ruggly

ruggly
  • Members
  • 7 570 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

So....the new topic: there has been an opinion posted in other threads that Synthesis is optional on the individual level, based on the Catalyst's statement that it cannot be forced.

Auld Wulf, if you read this, could you explain how this is possible, given the Catalyst's following statement in the Synthesis exposition:

"The energy of the Crucible, released in this way, will alter the matrix of all organic life in the galaxy"?

I can see no way to reconcile this statement with the statement that Synthesis is optional on an individual level. If you can, please explain, since I would like such a scenario. The closest I can come to that is to say that Synthesis gives you a tool, to realize self-improvements you want. You have a choice about what you do with that tool, you can even ignore it altogether, which would enable you to live as you've always done, but the tool itself is not optional since it's built into your body. You may be able to get rid of it eventually, but at the moment of Synthesis you are changed. Period. That, btw, has been my interpretation since day one.

So, I would really like to get out of the ethical conundrum, but I can't see how it is possible given the statement above. As I see it, the Catalyst's line "It cannot be forced" means that *it* cannot force Synthesis on the galaxy, it needs the willing input of an organic individual. Or it can mean that organic civilization must reach a certain technological and/or cultural state of advancement before Synthesis can work. It cannot be forced on a civilization before its time. The statement "they were not ready" appears to support this interpretation. Any other interpretation would result in a contradiction.


I know you've already given me your interpretation on what happens to the more primitive synthesized races.  But I still have to wonder, from my persective, if those "lesser" races are also forcibly evolved to, essentially, catch up to the more advanced races, because synthesis is supposed to put everyone on a level playing field.  If they are latent until the technology becomes available to them, then that's good.  But if forces them to play catch up, then I don't see good results coming from this unless the other races come around to help them fit in (and even then...that's a bit iffy).  Perhaps someone else will be able to answer this?  I'd imagine they would notice something has changed.  My mind just continuously pulls out bad scenarios.

#6844
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages

Nimrodell wrote...
Ieldra, sorry for interrupting your line of thought - but think you'll actually need this info for some future discussions. Organics vs synthetics theme (without reapers) is actually not something that just popped in in ME3... even I forgot about the side quest and the lines from ME1. Remember that rogue AI side quest from the Citadel, when u track the funneling of credits starting from the Flux Club? Well, when you finally reach that AI and if you tell it something like, this doesn't have to end with violence - it just simply states the theme from ME3 - organics will always try just to destroy or control the synthetics... and strangely, those are the basic choices any player gets at the end of ME3. No matter how much you try to convince that Citadel rogue AI that you don't want to kill it, it won't believe you. Somehow, I think this is important for your further discussions.

I have always been aware of this and I have already used in it discussions as a minor foreshadowing of the organic/synthetic theme, but unfortunately, this is a small sidequest. Its narrative significance is very limited, especially given the prominent examples of friendly AIs later in the trilogy. Even in ME1, we have an indication that synthetics are not fundamentally hostile to organics. Did you decode the binary code at the end of the Rogue VI mission? it translates as "Help".

As for the parallel to the ending choices....I think this overlooks the fact that Shepard becomes a synthetic if you choose Control. I see Control more as "Synthetics become dominant", Destroy as "organics stay dominant" and Synthesis as "advancement through synergy".

Modifié par Ieldra2, 17 février 2013 - 08:15 .


#6845
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
@ruggly:
Synthesis puts organics and synthetics on a level playing field, not everyone. This is actually the most prevalent misinterpretation of Synthesis: it doesn't make "everyone the same", it just reduces the topological difference between organic and synthetic life forms. It does nothing to reduce the difference between one organic life form and other, or one synthetic life form and another.

So yes, I think that pre-technological civilizations stay that way and aren't forcibly advanced. When the dominant civilizations come into contact with them, they'll deal with them according to the prevailing cultural attitude, which we have no way of foreseeing. It can be anything between a "prime directive" and ruthless colonization. Synthesis does not necessarily influence the way more advanced civilizations treat less advanced ones. It has overcome *one* conflict - the one between organics and synthetics. Other conflicts are not necessarily affected.

#6846
ruggly

ruggly
  • Members
  • 7 570 messages
I see, I see.

Posted Image

Modifié par ruggly, 17 février 2013 - 09:14 .


#6847
Obadiah

Obadiah
  • Members
  • 5 773 messages
I just finished playing the Omega DLC. What do you think the kind of power that comes from Synthesis will do to a place like that?

Omega is basically a dictatorship run by a warlord who allows factions to control parts of the station, all the while facilitating criminal activity that takes place in the rest of the galaxy. In the novels, the place is like a failed state for the people that live there.

#6848
Wayning_Star

Wayning_Star
  • Members
  • 8 022 messages

Obadiah wrote...

I just finished playing the Omega DLC. What do you think the kind of power that comes from Synthesis will do to a place like that?

Omega is basically a dictatorship run by a warlord who allows factions to control parts of the station, all the while facilitating criminal activity that takes place in the rest of the galaxy. In the novels, the place is like a failed state for the people that live there.


in a sense, the MEU is a failed military state, so? One despot coup's another and lessors scramble to coup that one.

#6849
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages

Obadiah wrote...
I just finished playing the Omega DLC. What do you think the kind of power that comes from Synthesis will do to a place like that?

Omega is basically a dictatorship run by a warlord who allows factions to control parts of the station, all the while facilitating criminal activity that takes place in the rest of the galaxy. In the novels, the place is like a failed state for the people that live there.

I don't think anything significant will necessarily change. Crime will adapt to the new possibilities, as will law enforcement.

#6850
jtav

jtav
  • Members
  • 13 965 messages
I've been working on a story that deals with Synthesis a bit, which means i had to do decide what it does. This is what I came up with. Feedback welcome:

The Prothean device unleashed massive quantities of energy, but as the Illusive Man had said, it would not be confined to the Reapers. The genetic structure of all organic life would be rewritten in an instant to grant immunity to indoctrination. The scientists had seemed particularly interested in the ability to implant themselves with Reaper technology without fear of harm. They had spoken of creating a vast network of linked minds, a sort of mental extranet that would allow the Protheans to think as fast and well as a Reaper. To become them without losing their individuality or their physical forms. All the benefits and none of the downsides. What it did to the Reapers was as yet unknown

...

"If you mean 'have I figured out what the Protheans thought the thing would do when they turned it on' then probably. But no sane modern engineer would put all his resources into this. It's a fairytale. Full integration with Reaper technology? A wonderful fairytale, but still a fairytale."

He stroked his beard, and his brow furrowed. "The Illusive Man thinks he can already integrate Reaper technology safely. Why would the Protheans need something of this scale and scope to do it?"

"Maybe he doesn't have the technology as well integrated as he thought," she muttered darkly. "Archer didn't have his technology integrated properly. I spent days cleaning up that mess."

“The Illusive Man never had Overlord implanted in most of his troops." His frown deepened. "Still, the rumored side effects do give one pause. But if we could have the physical benefits without indoctrination, it would be the greatest discovery for humanity since the relays. He looked at her brace. "I read what the implants did to Grayson’s body while they were shredding his mind."

So had she. She had met him a few times after the Illusive Man had entrusted a child to his care. He had been an out-of-shape, sandblasted executive who she could have beaten with no weapons and one hand tied behind her back. The Reaper avatar had been a graceful engine of destruction who could bound across surfaces and take Leng to his limit in hand-to-hand.