A different ascension - the Synthesis compendium (now with EC material integrated)
#8051
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 08:19
#8052
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 08:23
Ieldra2 wrote...
Funny thing. It just occurred to me that Shepard already is the avatar of a human-made Synthesis. And I thought I we couldn't find any *more* inconsistencies in the narrative. Oh my....
Yes. Shepard is the avatar of human betterment through technology by having implants which make her no better than she was. That makes perfect sense. Oh my....
#8053
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 08:48
It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon.David7204 wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
Funny thing. It just occurred to me that Shepard already is the avatar of a human-made Synthesis. And I thought I we couldn't find any *more* inconsistencies in the narrative. Oh my....
Yes. Shepard is the avatar of human betterment through technology by having implants which make her no better than she was. That makes perfect sense. Oh my....
Modifié par Ieldra2, 30 décembre 2013 - 08:49 .
#8054
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 08:55
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Otherwise, it doesn't sell well to me. There's more magic in day-to-day living and casual existence than Synthesis.
BTW, I'm not here to bash it (even if I've done that before). Just something on my mind. The story works in many ways.
Modifié par StreetMagic, 30 décembre 2013 - 08:57 .
#8055
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 08:55
What utter hogwash. Even if that information wasn't of very dubious 'canoncity' due to BioWare improving their skill and commitment to animation in general, it could very easily be explained by Shepard developing from experience, training with the various specialists on board, and dedicating herself more to physical fitness in acknowledgement of the dangers she faces and the importance of her mission. Or can people only physically improve when they have implants put in? Not to mention the better armor, shields, weapons and whatnot no doubt more canonically available to Shepard in ME 2 and ME 3.Ieldra2 wrote...
It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durableDavid7204 wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
Funny thing. It just occurred to me that Shepard already is the avatar of a human-made Synthesis. And I thought I we couldn't find any *more* inconsistencies in the narrative. Oh my....
Yes. Shepard is the avatar of human betterment through technology by having implants which make her no better than she was. That makes perfect sense. Oh my....
in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon.
Modifié par David7204, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:01 .
#8056
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 08:57
Modifié par David7204, 30 décembre 2013 - 08:57 .
#8057
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:08
Ieldra2 wrote...
It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon.
While true, how does Shepard being able to drink ryncol and fire a Widow without breaking an arm lend to understanding between organics and synthetics?
#8058
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:10
iakus wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon.
While true, how does Shepard being able to drink ryncol and fire a Widow without breaking an arm lend to understanding between organics and synthetics?
It doesn't, but I don't think that was the point Ieldra was trying to make.
#8059
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:15
David7204 wrote...
What utter hogwash. Even if that information wasn't of very dubious 'canoncity' due to BioWare improving their skill and commitment to animation in general, it could very easily be explained by Shepard developing from experience, training with the various specialists on board, and dedicating herself more to physical fitness in acknowledgement of the dangers she faces and the importance of her mission. Or can people only physically improve when they have implants put in? Not to mention the better armor, shields, weapons and whatnot no doubt more canonically available to Shepard in ME 2 and ME 3.Ieldra2 wrote...
It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durableDavid7204 wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
Funny thing. It just occurred to me that Shepard already is the avatar of a human-made Synthesis. And I thought I we couldn't find any *more* inconsistencies in the narrative. Oh my....
Yes. Shepard is the avatar of human betterment through technology by having implants which make her no better than she was. That makes perfect sense. Oh my....
in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon.
And all of that is supplemented (or in fact supplements) Shepard having new upgrades and cybernetics.
This seems like a deliberate attempt to attack more of Ieldra's intent rather than his actual argument. It should be pretty easy to realize that physical upgrades, cybernetics, and implants go hand-in-hand with Shepard's training and skills to make him a much stronger individual.
#8060
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:15
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Then again, he's durable enough to headbutt Krogan, but I think, for the most part, he's just Evil Knieval in space.
#8061
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:21
Yet again: understanding is not the point of Synthesis on the organic side. Conflict resolution or prevention is not its point either. The point is affecting the outcome, balancing some of the disadvantages of organics so that conflicts don't result in extinction. Then there's the Cipher which gives Shepard a unique *mental* perspective as well, though that isn't exactly a result of technology and it doesn't bring them closer to synthetics so it may not count for this argument exactly. It still counts for Shepard as a transhuman.iakus wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon.
While true, how does Shepard being able to drink ryncol and fire a Widow without breaking an arm lend to understanding between organics and synthetics?
That's a sideshow though. What I wanted to illustrate is that Shepard is an example of a perfectly functional partly synthetic, partly organic individual where the aspects mesh at a level low enough that you don't see the lines where they meet, and that thus - we don't need the Synthesis' space magic to achieve it, which means that this adds one more inconsistency to ME3's story. In principle, ME3's Synthesis achieves nothing for organics beyond what Shepard already has. The debate how this provides a solution for the organic/synthetic conflict is a separate one.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:29 .
#8062
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:27
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Modifié par StreetMagic, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:28 .
#8063
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:28
How ironic, Ieldra. For all your talk of vitalism, you're quite eager to gleefully embrace exactly the same concepts.
Modifié par David7204, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:30 .
#8064
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:32
David7204 wrote...
You utterly failed to do so. If Synthesis means a universe where humans have the option to mesh with technology, we've clearly achieved Synthesis in the real world right now, today. And thus it's clearly a meaningless concept.
No, David, it's not. The concept of being able to integrate technology is rudimentary, and regardless, Synthesis does much more than simply allowing humans to overcome some physical limitations with technology.
You aren't defining a threshold for how humans are meshing with technology, or on what level. For example, you could say one who is wearing glasses is a synthetic. Or someone with a glass-eye is synthetic. Or with an artificial heart. Or with a steel plate in their leg.
That is not synthesis. Synthesis, as BW meant for it to be interpreted, is a mixture of purely synthetic traits with purely organic ones. Organics now have traits that synthetics have, while synthetics now have an apparent understanding of organic processes and faculties and motivations.
Granted, it's all bull**** in the way its written and treated in the game, but the concept itself is not alien, nor is it far-fetched.
I can't believe I just defended Synthesis...
Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:34 .
#8065
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:34
#8066
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:35
David7204 wrote...
How ironic, Ieldra. For all your talk of vitalism, you're quite eager to gleefully embrace exactly the same concepts.
You pulled that out of your ass. Really is there any way you can communicate with people that doesn't involve belittling and insulting them?
#8067
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:38
@MassivelyEffective:
Thanks for saying things better than I did.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:40 .
#8068
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:38
Modifié par David7204, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:39 .
#8069
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:39
#8070
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:40
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Modifié par StreetMagic, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:41 .
#8071
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:41
#8072
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:41
Well, David, that (your previous post before the last one, since you pre-empted me by a second or so) has to be the biggest strawman anyone has ever built here on BSN, and that's saying something.
As for the threshold: that would be the point where (a) technology does not feel foreign any more and (
Modifié par Ieldra2, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:46 .
#8073
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:41
#8074
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:43
#8075
Posté 30 décembre 2013 - 09:47
AresKeith wrote...
David shouldn't you be playing DAO





Retour en haut





