Aller au contenu

Photo

A different ascension - the Synthesis compendium (now with EC material integrated)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
9088 réponses à ce sujet

#8051
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
??? I don't understand what you've written there, Swoby.

#8052
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Funny thing. It just occurred to me that Shepard already is the avatar of a human-made Synthesis. And I thought I we couldn't find any *more* inconsistencies in the narrative. Oh my....


Yes. Shepard is the avatar of human betterment through technology by having implants which make her no better than she was. That makes perfect sense. Oh my....

#8053
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages

David7204 wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...
Funny thing. It just occurred to me that Shepard already is the avatar of a human-made Synthesis. And I thought I we couldn't find any *more* inconsistencies in the narrative. Oh my....


Yes. Shepard is the avatar of human betterment through technology by having implants which make her no better than she was. That makes perfect sense. Oh my....

It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon. 

Modifié par Ieldra2, 30 décembre 2013 - 08:49 .


#8054
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests
I think I would pick synthesis if I had nothing to live for (rather, if Shepard didn't). I see the story working pretty well that way.. as a final resignation. Like Thane's death. If I had screwed up a lot like he did, and got my wife killed.. say, if I got my LI (like Ash, Jack, Tali, or Miranda) killed, I'd see Shepard as miserable and death-seeking. They all can die in a tragic way, where it'd push me over the edge. And at best, maybe trying to die in a meaningful way. Synthesis would be a good way out.

Otherwise, it doesn't sell well to me. There's more magic in day-to-day living and casual existence than Synthesis.

BTW, I'm not here to bash it (even if I've done that before). Just something on my mind. The story works in many ways.

Modifié par StreetMagic, 30 décembre 2013 - 08:57 .


#8055
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...
Funny thing. It just occurred to me that Shepard already is the avatar of a human-made Synthesis. And I thought I we couldn't find any *more* inconsistencies in the narrative. Oh my....


Yes. Shepard is the avatar of human betterment through technology by having implants which make her no better than she was. That makes perfect sense. Oh my....

It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable
in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon. 

What utter hogwash. Even if that information wasn't of very dubious 'canoncity' due to BioWare improving their skill and commitment to animation in general, it could very easily be explained by Shepard developing from experience, training with the various specialists on board, and dedicating herself more to physical fitness in acknowledgement of the dangers she faces and the importance of her mission. Or can people only physically improve when they have implants put in? Not to mention the better armor, shields, weapons and whatnot no doubt more canonically available to Shepard in ME 2 and ME 3.

Modifié par David7204, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:01 .


#8056
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
Double post.

Modifié par David7204, 30 décembre 2013 - 08:57 .


#8057
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 421 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon. 


While true, how does Shepard being able to drink ryncol and fire a Widow without breaking an arm lend to understanding between organics and synthetics?

#8058
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

iakus wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon. 


While true, how does Shepard being able to drink ryncol and fire a Widow without breaking an arm lend to understanding between organics and synthetics?


It doesn't, but I don't think that was the point Ieldra was trying to make.

#8059
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

David7204 wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...
Funny thing. It just occurred to me that Shepard already is the avatar of a human-made Synthesis. And I thought I we couldn't find any *more* inconsistencies in the narrative. Oh my....


Yes. Shepard is the avatar of human betterment through technology by having implants which make her no better than she was. That makes perfect sense. Oh my....

It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable
in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon. 

What utter hogwash. Even if that information wasn't of very dubious 'canoncity' due to BioWare improving their skill and commitment to animation in general, it could very easily be explained by Shepard developing from experience, training with the various specialists on board, and dedicating herself more to physical fitness in acknowledgement of the dangers she faces and the importance of her mission. Or can people only physically improve when they have implants put in? Not to mention the better armor, shields, weapons and whatnot no doubt more canonically available to Shepard in ME 2 and ME 3.


And all of that is supplemented (or in fact supplements) Shepard having new upgrades and cybernetics. 

This seems like a deliberate attempt to attack more of Ieldra's intent rather than his actual argument. It should be pretty easy to realize that physical upgrades, cybernetics, and implants go hand-in-hand with Shepard's training and skills to make him a much stronger individual.

#8060
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests
Shepard is crazy. Not superhuman.

Then again, he's durable enough to headbutt Krogan, but I think, for the most part, he's just Evil Knieval in space.

#8061
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages

iakus wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

It does, because the "biosynthetic fusion" has made Shepard quite a bit more physically capable and durable in ME2 and ME3. Watch the relevant cutscenes. It's canon. 


While true, how does Shepard being able to drink ryncol and fire a Widow without breaking an arm lend to understanding between organics and synthetics?

Yet again: understanding is not the point of Synthesis on the organic side. Conflict resolution or prevention is not its point either. The point is affecting the outcome, balancing some of the disadvantages of organics so that conflicts don't result in extinction. Then there's the Cipher which gives Shepard a unique *mental* perspective as well, though that isn't exactly a result of technology and it doesn't bring them closer to synthetics so it may not count for this argument exactly. It still counts for Shepard as a transhuman.

That's a sideshow though. What I wanted to illustrate is that Shepard is an example of a perfectly functional partly synthetic, partly organic individual where the aspects mesh at a level low enough that you don't see the lines where they meet, and that thus - we don't need the Synthesis' space magic to achieve it, which means that this adds one more inconsistency to ME3's story. In principle, ME3's Synthesis achieves nothing for organics beyond what Shepard already has. The debate how this provides a solution for the organic/synthetic conflict is a separate one.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:29 .


#8062
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests
Conflict is good for a game franchise. That's the one thing I dislike sometimes about ME3's direction. It tries to point forwards often to a more conflict fee horizon. I'm not all that interested. Every time I think of the future of Mass Effect, I think of the wonderful possibilties for conflict. Salarians uplifting Yahg, Krogan expansion, Krogan expanding into human space or trying to take over the Traverse, Turian and Krogan conflict if you didn't help Victus, rising Synthetics, the role of humanity in general, the role of rachni, the humbling and rebuilding efforts of Asari, etc.. It all sounds pretty fun to me. Why the hell would I want to solve it? :\\

Modifié par StreetMagic, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:28 .


#8063
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
You utterly failed to do so. If Synthesis means a universe where humans have the option to mesh with technology to achieve some benefit, we've clearly achieved Synthesis in the real world right now, today. And thus it's clearly a meaningless concept.

How ironic, Ieldra. For all your talk of vitalism, you're quite eager to gleefully embrace exactly the same concepts.

Modifié par David7204, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:30 .


#8064
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

David7204 wrote...

You utterly failed to do so. If Synthesis means a universe where humans have the option to mesh with technology, we've clearly achieved Synthesis in the real world right now, today. And thus it's clearly a meaningless concept.


No, David, it's not. The concept of being able to integrate technology is rudimentary, and regardless, Synthesis does much more than simply allowing humans to overcome some physical limitations with technology.

You aren't defining a threshold for how humans are meshing with technology, or on what level. For example, you could say one who is wearing glasses is a synthetic. Or someone with a glass-eye is synthetic. Or with an artificial heart. Or with a steel plate in their leg. 

That is not synthesis. Synthesis, as BW meant for it to be interpreted, is a mixture of purely synthetic traits with purely organic ones. Organics now have traits that synthetics have, while synthetics now have an apparent understanding of organic processes and faculties and motivations.

Granted, it's all bull**** in the way its written and treated in the game, but the concept itself is not alien, nor is it far-fetched.

I can't believe I just defended Synthesis...

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:34 .


#8065
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
That's right. I could. If murky semi-pseudo-canonical physical benefits are Synthesis, surely technology that, for example, restores a human's vision or hearing also qualifies.

#8066
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

David7204 wrote...
How ironic, Ieldra. For all your talk of vitalism, you're quite eager to gleefully embrace exactly the same concepts.


You pulled that out of your ass. Really is there any way you can communicate with people that doesn't involve belittling and insulting them?

#8067
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
We do not seamlessly mesh with technology. Shepard appears to do that. It's not a digital off/on switch though but a quantized process and Synthesis is implied to go beyond what the galaxy can achieve on its own, yes. Nonetheless, that implication is meaningless if we don't get to see the difference. We even get the green eyes effect in Overlord...

@MassivelyEffective:
Thanks for saying things better than I did.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:40 .


#8068
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
I did no such thing at all. Clearly, by Ieldra's definition, Shepard's implants have some magical human spark that qualifies them not just as Synthesis, but the avatar of Synthesis. Clearly, a magical human spark other technology doesn't have and isn't capable of having. A spark that exists outside the realm of physics and biology, obviously.

Modifié par David7204, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:39 .


#8069
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages
David shouldn't you be playing DAO

#8070
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests
I can't shake the impression that it was intended as a sort of final "goodbye" to the franchise. And they expected to move on to that other IP they're working on. That it wasn't meant to be dissected too much. That perhaps they even bet on people falling in line and choosing it in droves (a miscalculation, I think. I think more people love Mass Effect, rather than want to end it like that - or any other way, for that matter).

Modifié par StreetMagic, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:41 .


#8071
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
Can you define this threshold and your reasoning for it, Ieldra? Or this more of a 'pile of sand' sort of thing? Or are you willing to admit this is vitalism?

#8072
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages
ROFL!

Well, David, that (your previous post before the last one, since you pre-empted me by a second or so) has to be the biggest strawman anyone has ever built here on BSN, and that's saying something.

As for the threshold: that would be the point where (a) technology does not feel foreign any more and (B) meshing with it results in improvements that balance out against the advantages of purely synthetic entities. The story does not provide a hard answer, and RL parallels won't work because we don't have synthetic life.  

Modifié par Ieldra2, 30 décembre 2013 - 09:46 .


#8073
ruggly

ruggly
  • Members
  • 7 563 messages
Those pesky goalposts keep moving.

#8074
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
Tell me Ieldra, if it's not a magical spark that makes Shepard's implants the human embodiment of Synthesis and modern technology not Synthesis at all, then what exactly is it?

#8075
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

AresKeith wrote...

David shouldn't you be playing DAO