Aller au contenu

Photo

A different ascension - the Synthesis compendium (now with EC material integrated)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
9088 réponses à ce sujet

#951
antares_sublight

antares_sublight
  • Members
  • 762 messages

Xandurpein wrote...
If it can be done once, it can be done again. It's ridiculous to assume that the Crucible can only be built once.


If the technology behind the Destroy option can be built again, then after Synthesis all life in the galaxy has an instant deactivation button. Maybe it won't be galaxy-wide because of missing relays, but it would be a powerful weapon.

Modifié par antares_sublight, 24 mai 2012 - 10:18 .


#952
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

antares_sublight wrote...

Who even says he's an AI in the first place? All assumptions.


If he's a VI, that's even worse, dude. That means he definitely has no motives beyond his programming.

antares_sublight wrote... 
That's your right to have willful blissful naivete, you just can't justify it as anything beyond that.


So you see clear "New Eden" motifs and immediately think "doom and apocalypse?"

It's not naivete, it's comprehension. Something you are actively throwing out the window.

#953
Kreid

Kreid
  • Members
  • 1 159 messages

Xandurpein wrote...
I was being generous and said 10 generations, but change to a hundred; that's the time it took us to get from the Roman Empire to Space. We know the Protheans could already build primitive Mass relays and we can reverse engineer things. If it can be done once, it can be done again. It's ridiculous to assume that the Crucible can only be built once.

It's not about building the Crucible, it's about teh Catalyst and the Mass Relays, the endings are suppossed to present an exceptional series of events, might the phenomenon be replicated? Experience tells us technology can be replicated, but, can you replicate something like the Citadel/Catalyst?

If the Catalyst views things in a way that is impossible to grasp, then why should we even listen to it? If my moral code is too limited to grasp the situatuon isn't that reason enough to not make a choice that affects the whole Galaxy? How can you even claim that something is for the greater good if you can't tie it to a moral code? 

That's tye hard part, you are forced to make a choice you are fundamentally not prepared to, because if you don't, evey soul in the galaxy will suffer, that's the weight in Shepard's shouldrs.

#954
antares_sublight

antares_sublight
  • Members
  • 762 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

antares_sublight wrote...

Who even says he's an AI in the first place? All assumptions.


If he's a VI, that's even worse, dude. That means he definitely has no motives beyond his programming.

Who says he's a VI? What does Shepard become when he selects Control? Who knows...

Optimystic_X wrote...

antares_sublight wrote... 
That's your right to have willful blissful naivete, you just can't justify it as anything beyond that.


So you see clear "New Eden" motifs and immediately think "doom and apocalypse?"

No, both would be assumptions. No one has any idea what has just happened or what the effects will be.

Optimystic_X wrote...
It's not naivete, it's comprehension. Something you are actively throwing out the window.

It's assumption of your best wishes and ignoring anything that might be negative, as you plainly stated you are doing. "Reading into" isn't "comprehension".

#955
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Heeden wrote...

Do you have an argument against a form of Synthesis that doesn't change the physical bodies people inhabit?


Yes. Simply enacting it.

You affect everyone in Synthesis.

Potentially eveyone in Control. You have an unknown. No Dice.

We have an exact number in Destroy. The Geth and EDI.

It's about how many people you violate. You are going to be violating someone at some point.

I will always choose less.

Disgusting, but when you have to make a choice like this I will always choose the result that will affect the least amount of people.

#956
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

antares_sublight wrote...

Who says he's a VI? What does Shepard become when he selects Control? Who knows...


So he's neither a VI, nor an AI? Do you think he's actually the kid from Earth or something?

antares_sublight wrote... 
No, both would be assumptions. No one has any idea what has just happened or what the effects will be.


It is an assumption supported by the tone of the ending. If they wanted to portray it negatively they have the tools do so easily, like any artist. Mood, lighting, composition, imagery etc. Basic stuff.

antares_sublight wrote...  
It's assumption of your best wishes and ignoring anything that might be negative, as you plainly stated you are doing. "Reading into" isn't "comprehension".


I have no compelling reason to focus on negative outcomes given the overwhelmingly positive tone. Bioware's execution was sloppy, but their intention was clear as day - "Synthesis is good."

#957
Heeden

Heeden
  • Members
  • 856 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Heeden wrote...

Do you have an argument against a form of Synthesis that doesn't change the physical bodies people inhabit?


Yes. Simply enacting it.

You affect everyone in Synthesis.

Potentially eveyone in Control. You have an unknown. No Dice.

We have an exact number in Destroy. The Geth and EDI.

It's about how many people you violate. You are going to be violating someone at some point.

I will always choose less.

Disgusting, but when you have to make a choice like this I will always choose the result that will affect the least amount of people.



Destroy completely annihilates many beings, each Reaper being the equivalent to a whole civilisation. Synthesis gives people a new perspective, I don't even count it as a violation.

#958
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Disgusting, but when you have to make a choice like this I will always choose the result that will affect the least amount of people.


So you would rather murder 100 people than tie up 1000? Because that's what you're saying.

Numbers alone are not the only consideration.

Modifié par Optimystic_X, 24 mai 2012 - 10:37 .


#959
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Heeden wrote...
Destroy completely annihilates many beings, each Reaper being the equivalent to a whole civilisation. Synthesis gives people a new perspective, I don't even count it as a violation.


You assume that the Reaper has any data that can be extracted. Prove to me that you can extract vast amounts of data from thjeir corpses.

Doing anything to people in such a manner without their knowledge or consent is a violation. You cannot do that.

Giving people new perspectives? New. Perspectives?

You force that upon everyone.

:sick:

#960
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Disgusting, but when you have to make a choice like this I will always choose the result that will affect the least amount of people.


So you would rather murder 100 people than tie up 1000? Because that's what you're saying.

Numbers alone are not the only consideration.


Straw manning again?

I would rather kill someone that force a change of unknown quantities upon them.

Everything is affected. Depending on your view of what Synthesis does you can make the assumption that killing someone is better forcing them to accept a new perspective in your holy utopia.

You have no idea what Synthesis does.

#961
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
Also, Synthesis wouldn't stop new organics from arising because the base elements exist in the Universe and you can't be rid of them.

LOL.

What if they make new Synthetics?

LOL

The only reason this thread has lasted as long as it has is because no one has the faintest idea about Synthesis does.

What happens to Synthesis if it really does rewrite something in the EC?

Does this pipe dream go down the tube?

Modifié par Taboo-XX, 24 mai 2012 - 10:50 .


#962
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

I would rather kill someone that force a change of unknown quantities upon them.


You realize that "unknown" is neutral, not negative, right?

Taboo-XX wrote... 
Everything is affected. Depending on your view of what Synthesis does you can make the assumption that killing someone is better forcing them to accept a new perspective in your holy utopia.


And depending on your view, you can see life (even synthetic life) as being sacred, and not wanting to commit genocide when there is a way out.

Taboo-XX wrote... 
You have no idea what Synthesis does.


I know what it doesn't do - kill the Geth.

#963
Heeden

Heeden
  • Members
  • 856 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Heeden wrote...
Destroy completely annihilates many beings, each Reaper being the equivalent to a whole civilisation. Synthesis gives people a new perspective, I don't even count it as a violation.


You assume that the Reaper has any data that can be extracted. Prove to me that you can extract vast amounts of data from thjeir corpses.


It's not about extracting information from their corpses, it's about killing off an entire race of sentient beings, each one so highly developed they could be considered equivalent to whole civilisations.

Doing anything to people in such a manner without their knowledge or consent is a violation. You cannot do that.

Giving people new perspectives? New. Perspectives?

You force that upon everyone.

:sick:


I'm sorry the thought of opening up new channels of information between people makes you sick, I've no idea why the idea of encouraging empathy and understanding should offend you so much. Would you force everyone to sit in the dark because the light would violate everyone's eyes?

#964
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
They do not exist in the Reapers. I have yet to see some sort of information retrieved from paste. I am no more a cow when I eat a hamburger than than the human Reaper was a record of our existence.

Forcing any type of emotion upon people is wrong. You sound like the computer from THX 1138.

"Be Happy."

Jesus Christ.

#965
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Also, Synthesis wouldn't stop new organics from arising because the base elements exist in the Universe and you can't be rid of them.

LOL.

What if they make new Synthetics?

LOL


Elements alone do not organics (or synthetics) make. What matters is how they are combined, and THAT is what Synthesis has permanently altered.

For example, say the primordial soups of every world in the galaxy have been seeded with nanites. Nothing will come out of that without being synthesized. And any synthetics those beings create, will be done using hybridized platforms, resulting in more hybrids.

 

Taboo-XX wrote... 
What happens to Synthesis if it really does rewrite something in the EC?

Does this pipe dream go down the tube?


You mean if they retcon it to be negative?

To paraphrase Dr. Mordin Solus: "Never changed mind. {Synthesis} proper decision at time. New circumstances necessitate course correction."

#966
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
As for the unknown? Yes, I see it as a possibility of a threat. In the vastness of the Universe I'm fairly certain that some form of life exists and it probably isn't very friendly. Stephen Hawking has written essays on this. Do you read those?

The unknown is absolutely terrifying.

#967
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

They do not exist in the Reapers. I have yet to see some sort of information retrieved from paste.


Legion explicitly tells you that their minds are uploaded. Minds contain information, by definition.

We just haven't seen it used, because they are under the Catalyst's absolute control.

#968
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...



Elements alone do not organics (or synthetics) make. What matters is how they are combined, and THAT is what Synthesis has permanently altered.

For example, say the primordial soups of every world in the galaxy have been seeded with nanites. Nothing will come out of that without being synthesized. And any synthetics those beings create, will be done using hybridized platforms, resulting in more hybrids.

 


Then you have violated the very basic functioning of the Universe. Who the **** has that kind of authority?

What a disgusting concept you promote.

You wish to enforce how everything evolves and is created? Do you know who you sound like?

#969
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

As for the unknown? Yes, I see it as a possibility of a threat. In the vastness of the Universe I'm fairly certain that some form of life exists and it probably isn't very friendly. Stephen Hawking has written essays on this. Do you read those?

The unknown is absolutely terrifying.


All the more reason to protect ourselves via Synthesis; the chances of that unknown being another galaxy's tech singularity are higher than you think.

#970
PsyrenY

PsyrenY
  • Members
  • 5 238 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Then you have violated the very basic functioning of the Universe. Who the **** has that kind of authority?


You keep asking that question. I would have put it to a vote if I could.

Taboo-XX wrote... 

You wish to enforce how everything evolves and is created? Do you know who you sound like?


...not a mass-murderer?

#971
Heeden

Heeden
  • Members
  • 856 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

They do not exist in the Reapers. I have yet to see some sort of information retrieved from paste. I am no more a cow when I eat a hamburger than than the human Reaper was a record of our existence.

Forcing any type of emotion upon people is wrong. You sound like the computer from THX 1138.

"Be Happy."

Jesus Christ.


The Reapers - each one is a consensus like the Geth consisting of unknown numbers of sentient programs. Kill a Reaper, you kill a civilisation. Kill all the Reapers kill many civilisations. You don't examine a body, fail to find any memories and declare they can't have been alive.

And Synthesis doesn't force any emotions on anyone - turning on the lights let's people see but it doesn't cause them to feel a certain way about what they see.

#972
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

They do not exist in the Reapers. I have yet to see some sort of information retrieved from paste.


Legion explicitly tells you that their minds are uploaded. Minds contain information, by definition.

We just haven't seen it used, because they are under the Catalyst's absolute control.


That doesn't mean it is in any way or form extractable.

You think that the Catalyst would just let people extract that information?

Wouldn't that have happened in the past?

Reapers have been killed before.

Surely the Protheans would have done something of the sort. They DID hold off the Reapers for hundreds of years.

#973
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Optimystic_X wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Then you have violated the very basic functioning of the Universe. Who the **** has that kind of authority?


You keep asking that question. I would have put it to a vote if I could.

Taboo-XX wrote... 

You wish to enforce how everything evolves and is created? Do you know who you sound like?


...not a mass-murderer?


No, it makes you sound like a hubris laden monster. Destory is far from ethical, but it doesn't change the way the galaxy has functioned for billions of years.

#974
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

Heeden wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

They do not exist in the Reapers. I have yet to see some sort of information retrieved from paste. I am no more a cow when I eat a hamburger than than the human Reaper was a record of our existence.

Forcing any type of emotion upon people is wrong. You sound like the computer from THX 1138.

"Be Happy."

Jesus Christ.


The Reapers - each one is a consensus like the Geth consisting of unknown numbers of sentient programs. Kill a Reaper, you kill a civilisation. Kill all the Reapers kill many civilisations. You don't examine a body, fail to find any memories and declare they can't have been alive.

And Synthesis doesn't force any emotions on anyone - turning on the lights let's people see but it doesn't cause them to feel a certain way about what they see.


The key word in your sentence is "turning on the lights let's people see".

Let's people see.

Glorious.

:sick:

#975
Heeden

Heeden
  • Members
  • 856 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...]

No, it makes you sound like a hubris laden monster. Destory is far from ethical, but it doesn't change the way the galaxy has functioned for billions of years.


Well, apart from the bit where it does (ends Reaper cycle, at least for a while).

Then you're assuming that change is intrinsically bad. Where would you be if everytime chemicals were about to form DNA chains and kick-start life they stopped because it would fundamentally change the way the universe works? What if protons, neutrons and electrons decided to go their seperate ways and not create the elements? What if the pre-space-time potential singularity decided inflation would violate the universe's right to not exist?