Wouldn't that be murder? I mean, the Reapers can't help how they were created, or that they were "enslaved." Doesn't any consciousness, gestalt or otherwise, have a right not to be terminated without just cause? Especially over something it had no say in.Ieldra2 wrote...
Actually, that's a future project in one of my headcanon scenarios. But the Reapers need to survive the war for this.Vigilant111 wrote...
We will extract those minds out of u, goodbye reaper, ur role as a memory storage facility has come to an endIeldra2 wrote...
@General User:
I think you said it sounds like a prison. I do not disagree. I said it's a perversion of the ascension theme. It wasn't my intention to paint this as desirable, only to underline that a Reaper's consciousness is a gestalt mind of billions of individual organic minds. which means that killing a Reaper is genocide. In addition, the Reaper mind-control theory (Heh - I should give this theory a fancy name) means that individual Reapers are either not at all or only partly to blame for their actions. Thus we should look for solutions that do not destroy them.
A different ascension - the Synthesis compendium (now with EC material integrated)
#1526
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:26
#1527
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:27
It's not universalism which is an issue here, but notions of sanctity. I do not like ideologies which define a certain state of being as sacred and any deviations from that state as abomination. Those are the kind of people who would call MIranda an abomination because she's genetically engineered from scratch. This is the reason why I do not think Miranda would value organic purity all that highly.Taboo-XX wrote...
Ah, that would be our issue then Ieldra. Universalism isn't very popular amongst relativists it seems.
The Reapers are a perversion of the ascension theme. But to call the uploaded and conjoined minds abominations is an insult that should not come out of the mouth of a moral universalist. Or does your universalism only apply to life forms you ascribe a kind of sanctity to?
She doesn't voice any objections in my games. Also, if you're speaking of the Collector base, she's out of character in the Paragon scene with TIM there (there was a very intense debate about this several times in the Miranda thread. I'm definitely not alone in thinking that).You shouldn't mess with Major Tom.
Miranda doesn't think it's a good idea either.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 08 juin 2012 - 09:29 .
#1528
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:28
Ieldra2 wrote...
Who says the brain is liquefied before its contents is read? Come on, uploaded minds are such a staple of SF that insisting it's impossible will get you nowhere.
Everything in the game does. Starting from their little connectionless acid pods. And the question of what they need the protein paste for in that case.
This has nothing to do with Synthesis from ME3, obviously, but I don’t really think the theory works even as headcanon if you at least try to keep it from contradicting the game. Full AU is a different matter.
#1529
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:29
I would ask. I assume at least some of the conjoined minds would prefer to have their old forms back. The technology to do that should exist. Others wouldn't want that and I'd leave them alone. Of course that's not the version Vigilant111 would choose.General User wrote...
Wouldn't that be murder? I mean, the Reapers can't help how they were created, or that they were "enslaved." Doesn't any consciousness, gestalt or otherwise, have a right not to be terminated without just cause? Especially over something it had no say in.Ieldra2 wrote...
Actually, that's a future project in one of my headcanon scenarios. But the Reapers need to survive the war for this.Vigilant111 wrote...
We will extract those minds out of u, goodbye reaper, ur role as a memory storage facility has come to an endIeldra2 wrote...
@General User:
I think you said it sounds like a prison. I do not disagree. I said it's a perversion of the ascension theme. It wasn't my intention to paint this as desirable, only to underline that a Reaper's consciousness is a gestalt mind of billions of individual organic minds. which means that killing a Reaper is genocide. In addition, the Reaper mind-control theory (Heh - I should give this theory a fancy name) means that individual Reapers are either not at all or only partly to blame for their actions. Thus we should look for solutions that do not destroy them.
#1530
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:35
Ieldra2 wrote...
Actually, that's a future project in one of my headcanon scenarios. But the Reapers need to survive the war for this.Vigilant111 wrote...
We will extract those minds out of u, goodbye reaper, ur role as a memory storage facility has come to an endIeldra2 wrote...
@General User:
I think you said it sounds like a prison. I do not disagree. I said it's a perversion of the ascension theme. It wasn't my intention to paint this as desirable, only to underline that a Reaper's consciousness is a gestalt mind of billions of individual organic minds. which means that killing a Reaper is genocide. In addition, the Reaper mind-control theory (Heh - I should give this theory a fancy name) means that individual Reapers are either not at all or only partly to blame for their actions. Thus we should look for solutions that do not destroy them.
No, based on your interpretation, u are not supposed to destroy them after synthesis...all organic/synthetic conflicts cease remember?
Modifié par Vigilant111, 08 juin 2012 - 09:46 .
#1531
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:35
A "memory" is not sentient. Such things are created by connections in the brain. All I see now is a grisly collection of film strips. Whatever they "were" is long dead. The only thing that remains is a record of what happened to them. People lost their minds when exposed to such things. I don't imagine anything we'd find would be of substance.
A Reaper is a new life form created from them, it is not them. It more resembles a perverse Frankenstein.
And Miranda is not out of character. The Paragon romance changes her into a completely different person. If you aren't choosing the Paragon options, I can see why you'd think that. She's more than disgusted at the concept of seeing that data.
#1532
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:36
If the Reapers really were gestalt consciousnesses, I would think that the mere act of restoring the imprisoned minds their former independence would destroy the Reaper (or near enough) by rendering them hopelessly, impossibly schizophrenic.Ieldra2 wrote...
I would ask. I assume at least some of the conjoined minds would prefer to have their old forms back. The technology to do that should exist. Others wouldn't want that and I'd leave them alone. Of course that's not the version Vigilant111 would choose.General User wrote...
Wouldn't that be murder? I mean, the Reapers can't help how they were created, or that they were "enslaved." Doesn't any consciousness, gestalt or otherwise, have a right not to be terminated without just cause? Especially over something it had no say in.Ieldra2 wrote...
Actually, that's a future project in one of my headcanon scenarios. But the Reapers need to survive the war for this.Vigilant111 wrote...
We will extract those minds out of u, goodbye reaper, ur role as a memory storage facility has come to an endIeldra2 wrote...
@General User:
I think you said it sounds like a prison. I do not disagree. I said it's a perversion of the ascension theme. It wasn't my intention to paint this as desirable, only to underline that a Reaper's consciousness is a gestalt mind of billions of individual organic minds. which means that killing a Reaper is genocide. In addition, the Reaper mind-control theory (Heh - I should give this theory a fancy name) means that individual Reapers are either not at all or only partly to blame for their actions. Thus we should look for solutions that do not destroy them.
In other words, the mere act of giving them a choice might be murder.
And even that's if (and that's a HUUUUUUUGE "if") the minds in the Reapers are even sane in the first place.
Modifié par General User, 08 juin 2012 - 09:37 .
#1533
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:38
I suspected that Reaper minds are uploaded and conjoined organic minds when I first met Sovereign in ME1. Then ME2 confirmed it even before Legion said it outright because it's the only way the whole setup makes sense. Then came Legion - whom I believe more than EDI, because all too obviously the CB scenario, especially the visual presentation, was ruled by the wish to push the horror up to eleven, even if it comes at the cost of consistency.lillitheris wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
Who says the brain is liquefied before its contents is read? Come on, uploaded minds are such a staple of SF that insisting it's impossible will get you nowhere.
Everything in the game does. Starting from their little connectionless acid pods. And the question of what they need the protein paste for in that case.
This has nothing to do with Synthesis from ME3, obviously, but I don’t really think the theory works even as headcanon if you at least try to keep it from contradicting the game. Full AU is a different matter.
This is not AU. Just the opposite. As I see it, it is almost canon. Everything points there. Sovereign, "We are Harbinger", the claims of ascension, Legion, the Catalyst, the way organic individuals are needed to make a Reaper instead of just organic matter. It's the scene at the CB which is the anomaly.
#1534
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:49
Ieldra2 wrote...
It's not universalism which is an issue here, but notions of sanctity. I do not like ideologies which define a certain state of being as sacred and any deviations from that state as abomination. Those are the kind of people who would call MIranda an abomination because she's genetically engineered from scratch. This is the reason why I do not think Miranda would value organic purity all that highly.Taboo-XX wrote...
Ah, that would be our issue then Ieldra. Universalism isn't very popular amongst relativists it seems.
The Reapers are a perversion of the ascension theme. But to call the uploaded and conjoined minds abominations is an insult that should not come out of the mouth of a moral universalist. Or does your universalism only apply to life forms you ascribe a kind of sanctity to?She doesn't voice any objections in my games. Also, if you're speaking of the Collector base, she's out of character in the Paragon scene with TIM there (there was a very intense debate about this several times in the Miranda thread. I'm definitely not alone in thinking that).You shouldn't mess with Major Tom.
Miranda doesn't think it's a good idea either.
IMO, Miranda is something different. She's always been what she is, genetically engineered. She's never known any other state of being. She may not like what she is, and she may not like the idea of the process that made her although I'm guessing that this is more because she doesn't agree with the reasons behind her creation than because she dislikes her state of being completely.
What you're proposing to do with synthesis is to take an entire galaxy of beings who are all used to being what they are and from one moment to the next forcibly and completely changing that state of being without their consent. It's not like they will never have been any other way. They will be fully capably of remembering what they were and what they lost. That's another part of the horror for me.
#1535
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:51
As I said, ME2 pushed the horror up to eleven at the cost of consistency. I don't put much weight into it. And as I also said, uploaded minds are a staple of SF, you have no idea what is possible or not with the kind of tech the Reapers have, and you have no idea that it's just "static picture". I can say "No, it's more than that, the minds are intact", and you have no way to disprove the notion".
As for Miranda, more specifically I say she's out of character because she supports destroying the base out of sentimentality, because of what was done there. That's just stupid, and Miranda isn't stupid. But that's a topic for somewhere else, and of course you don't agree.
As for me and Paragon/Renegade: My Shepard almost all turn out neutral. But my main is like me - when it comes to notions of sanctity, I am most emphatically not a Paragon but rather an anti-traditionalist radical.
Hmm...did we derail this thread with the debate about the nature of the Reapers? Not really, I think, because Synthesis becomes a much more attractive choice if you recognize that the Reapers' mind are gestalt minds of billions of individual organic minds.
(BTW, not staying here until 3am this time. Off now)
@frylock:
May I remind you that in my interpretation, the process is reversible on an individual basis. And I do not think anything is lost by Synthesis except organic purity. Rather, Synthesis adds options. Besides, can't you see the hint of racism in the notion of organic purity?
Modifié par Ieldra2, 08 juin 2012 - 09:53 .
#1536
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:53
I'd imagine she's be pretty pissed if Shepard enacted Synthesis and forced a change on everyone.
People should grow and improve on their own, and not be subjected to such asinine policies. People are fine as they are, flawed and confused.
#1537
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:57
Ieldra2 wrote...
@Taboo:
As I said, ME2 pushed the horror up to eleven at the cost of consistency. I don't put much weight into it. And as I also said, uploaded minds are a staple of SF, you have no idea what is possible or not with the kind of tech the Reapers have, and you have no idea that it's just "static picture". I can say "No, it's more than that, the minds are intact", and you have no way to disprove the notion".
As for Miranda, more specifically I say she's out of character because she supports destroying the base out of sentimentality, because of what was done there. That's just stupid, and Miranda isn't stupid. But that's a topic for somewhere else, and of course you don't agree.
As for me and Paragon/Renegade: My Shepard almost all turn out neutral. But my main is like me - when it comes to notions of sanctity, I am most emphatically not a Paragon but rather an anti-traditionalist radical.
Hmm...did we derail this thread with the debate about the nature of the Reapers? Not really, I think, because Synthesis becomes a much more attractive choice if you recognize that the Reapers' mind are gestalt minds of billions of individual organic minds.
(BTW, not staying here until 3am this time. Off now)
@frylock:
May I remind you that in my interpretation, the process is reversible on an individual basis. And I do not think anything is lost by Synthesis except organic purity. Rather, Synthesis adds options. Besides, can't you see the hint of racism in the notion of organic purity?
I certainly see the hint of it in the idea that we must all be forced to be the same before we can begin to once again be different. But I also know that while you say we can have it reversed on an individual basis, I also know that things like this, once done are very seldom ever undone, and it won't always be because of the very happy state you assume all people will have once they but experience the joys of it.
Modifié par frylock23, 08 juin 2012 - 10:01 .
#1538
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 09:58
People are find the way they are. Such policies are what ultimately divide people, not bring them together.
#1539
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:01
Taboo-XX wrote...
The issue isn't that it makes people better. It's that you force them to be that way.
People are find the way they are. Such policies are what ultimately divide people, not bring them together.
Emphasis on the bolded part.
#1540
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:03
spiros9110 wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
The issue isn't that it makes people better. It's that you force them to be that way.
People are find the way they are. Such policies are what ultimately divide people, not bring them together.
Emphasis on the bolded part.
I cannot possibly understand why you'd think forcing people to be anything is a good idea. Ever.
That's the issue here. The amount of hubris required is so extreme it's not even funny.
#1541
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:03
Not at all!Ieldra2 wrote...
Hmm...did we derail this thread with the debate about the nature of the Reapers? Not really, I think, because Synthesis becomes a much more attractive choice if you recognize that the Reapers' mind are gestalt minds of billions of individual organic minds.
If the Reapers really are "gestalt minds of billions of individual organic minds", and Synthesis restores those minds to anything like their former independence, then Synthesis is as much genocide as the Catalyst suggests Destroy is.
Plus, there's no way to to be sure what sort of state those minds would be in. By choosing Synthesis, you might be turning loose on the galaxy thousands upon thousands of heavily traumatized schizophrenics, each with the fire power of a naval task force. Something entirely unacceptable.
#1542
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:04
Taboo-XX wrote...
The issue isn't that it makes people better. It's that you force them to be that way.
Both are issues to me.
Thrusting advancement upon a society when they aren't ready rarely has good outcomes. Mass Effect tries to make this point loosely with the Krogan.
#1543
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:05
Ieldra2 wrote...
Didn't your hear what I said? I did not get this dialogue because it is the Paragon version. In dialogues with Reapers, I rarely choose Paragon because I know I won't like what comes out fo Shepard's mouth.Taboo-XX wrote...
Thomas Shepard asks you NOT to mess with the overbearing id that is Major Tom in this clip.
Out of character? Nonsense. They died thousands of years ago, and are better left to rest in piece.
Even the writers don't think it's a good idea.
@KingZayd:
How? What does it matter? Likely you won't understand the process anyway? But consider this: in ME3 is any indication, every Sovereign-class Reaper will be created through processing on the Citadel, maybe the lesser Reapers as well. This is at least very suggestive.
Also, I think the Catalyst's consciousness is distributed through the CItadel and the Reapers, but there needs to be some hardware to carry it. You could say, every Reaper has a part of the Catalyst's brain implanted. There is no reason why it should be able to control organic individuals in their own bodies.
The Human Reaper was made on the other side of the Omega 4 Relay. How did they transfer the part of the Catalyst to it?
Well we can agree that Shepard's mind is puny compared to the collection of organic minds in the reapers right? Then you wouldn't need as big a chunk of Catalyst code to control him right? And it's not as if Shepard's body can't tolerate synthetic objects. It should be theoretically possible to.. implant him with the necessary hardware and gain control surely?
#1544
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:08
Ieldra2 wrote...
I suspected that Reaper minds are uploaded and conjoined organic minds when I first met Sovereign in ME1. Then ME2 confirmed it even before Legion said it outright because it's the only way the whole setup makes sense. Then came Legion - whom I believe more than EDI, because all too obviously the CB scenario, especially the visual presentation, was ruled by the wish to push the horror up to eleven, even if it comes at the cost of consistency.lillitheris wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
Who says the brain is liquefied before its contents is read? Come on, uploaded minds are such a staple of SF that insisting it's impossible will get you nowhere.
Everything in the game does. Starting from their little connectionless acid pods. And the question of what they need the protein paste for in that case.
This has nothing to do with Synthesis from ME3, obviously, but I don’t really think the theory works even as headcanon if you at least try to keep it from contradicting the game. Full AU is a different matter.
This is not AU. Just the opposite. As I see it, it is almost canon. Everything points there. Sovereign, "We are Harbinger", the claims of ascension, Legion, the Catalyst, the way organic individuals are needed to make a Reaper instead of just organic matter. It's the scene at the CB which is the anomaly.
I thought the same. When Legion decided upon the name Legion, I was thinking that the Geth and the Reapers were similar, and yet they had clear differences in philosophy. Both were "Legion", in that they effectively existed as hive minds, but they had different ideas wrt organics.
#1545
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:09
Ieldra2 wrote...
I suspected that Reaper minds are uploaded and conjoined organic minds when I first met Sovereign in ME1. Then ME2 confirmed it even before Legion said it outright because it's the only way the whole setup makes sense. Then came Legion - whom I believe more than EDI, because all too obviously the CB scenario, especially the visual presentation, was ruled by the wish to push the horror up to eleven, even if it comes at the cost of consistency.lillitheris wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
Who says the brain is liquefied before its contents is read? Come on, uploaded minds are such a staple of SF that insisting it's impossible will get you nowhere.
Everything in the game does. Starting from their little connectionless acid pods. And the question of what they need the protein paste for in that case.
This has nothing to do with Synthesis from ME3, obviously, but I don’t really think the theory works even as headcanon if you at least try to keep it from contradicting the game. Full AU is a different matter.
This is not AU. Just the opposite. As I see it, it is almost canon. Everything points there. Sovereign, "We are Harbinger", the claims of ascension, Legion, the Catalyst, the way organic individuals are needed to make a Reaper instead of just organic matter. It's the scene at the CB which is the anomaly.
You’re welcome to believe whatever you like. I’m not big on the “only thing that makes sense” argument since we’ve little reason to believe it can make sense. Flat-out ignoring clear contradictions isn’t a great boost to your case.
As I point out, the Reapers clearly do need organic matter.
The process in which the ‘individual’ is ‘stored’ directly contraindicates preservation of neural connections.
Occam.
The Legion quote is far more ambigous than you make it out to be too, for the record. Consider how the geth – who are made of many individual semi-sapient programs — need the Reaper code to become individuals. “One ship, one will, many minds.” That’s a post-Reaper code geth. Let me reiterate one word there: post-Reaper code geth.
Or, you know, it could be the geth not actually understanding what individuals are at that point.
Or just ******-poor writing.
…
I may seem hostile on this topic, and it’s because I am. I have absolutely nothing against you making up your own headcanon. What I do oppose is trying to label it as anything but.
Synthesis, as presented in the game, is completely nonsensical. What you’re talking about makes sense — if tenuously in places — but it’s not Synthesis.
#1546
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:11
Ieldra2 wrote...
@Taboo:
As I said, ME2 pushed the horror up to eleven at the cost of consistency. I don't put much weight into it. And as I also said, uploaded minds are a staple of SF, you have no idea what is possible or not with the kind of tech the Reapers have, and you have no idea that it's just "static picture". I can say "No, it's more than that, the minds are intact", and you have no way to disprove the notion".
As for Miranda, more specifically I say she's out of character because she supports destroying the base out of sentimentality, because of what was done there. That's just stupid, and Miranda isn't stupid. But that's a topic for somewhere else, and of course you don't agree.
As for me and Paragon/Renegade: My Shepard almost all turn out neutral. But my main is like me - when it comes to notions of sanctity, I am most emphatically not a Paragon but rather an anti-traditionalist radical.
Hmm...did we derail this thread with the debate about the nature of the Reapers? Not really, I think, because Synthesis becomes a much more attractive choice if you recognize that the Reapers' mind are gestalt minds of billions of individual organic minds.
(BTW, not staying here until 3am this time. Off now)
@frylock:
May I remind you that in my interpretation, the process is reversible on an individual basis. And I do not think anything is lost by Synthesis except organic purity. Rather, Synthesis adds options. Besides, can't you see the hint of racism in the notion of organic purity?
Haha, I wanted to destroy the base because of the Human Reaper. I was afraid of indoctrination (remember the derelict reaper) If it wasn't for indoctrination I would have kept the base, because destroying it would mean all those people died for nothing.
#1547
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:14
Taboo-XX wrote...
spiros9110 wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
The issue isn't that it makes people better. It's that you force them to be that way.
People are find the way they are. Such policies are what ultimately divide people, not bring them together.
Emphasis on the bolded part.
I cannot possibly understand why you'd think forcing people to be anything is a good idea. Ever.
That's the issue here. The amount of hubris required is so extreme it's not even funny.
I know it's not really the same, but the idea of the "force" reminds me of what the Salarians did the the Krogans and seeing what they were before their "uplift".
#1548
Posté 08 juin 2012 - 10:17
spiros9110 wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
spiros9110 wrote...
Taboo-XX wrote...
The issue isn't that it makes people better. It's that you force them to be that way.
People are find the way they are. Such policies are what ultimately divide people, not bring them together.
Emphasis on the bolded part.
I cannot possibly understand why you'd think forcing people to be anything is a good idea. Ever.
That's the issue here. The amount of hubris required is so extreme it's not even funny.
I know it's not really the same, but the idea of the "force" reminds me of what the Salarians did the the Krogans and seeing what they were before their "uplift".
Any sorta "uplift" pays a price, the Krogans were being used
#1549
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 07:05
I didn't want to imply that Synthesis would do that. Synthesis becomes attractive because it opens the way to such a thing later.General User wrote...
Not at all!Ieldra2 wrote...
Hmm...did we derail this thread with the debate about the nature of the Reapers? Not really, I think, because Synthesis becomes a much more attractive choice if you recognize that the Reapers' mind are gestalt minds of billions of individual organic minds.
If the Reapers really are "gestalt minds of billions of individual organic minds", and Synthesis restores those minds to anything like their former independence, then Synthesis is as much genocide as the Catalyst suggests Destroy is.
#1550
Posté 09 juin 2012 - 07:17





Retour en haut




