ioannisdenton wrote...
The way i see it. Me3 is SO baddly written compared to the previous games that actually the fan-generated from speculations IT makes sense and bioware should use it ASAP.
stysiaq wrote...
Salient Archer wrote...
I know it's off topic but, I would like to propose a question...
What is easier to believe?
1) An individual survives an explosion 50 times greater than hiroshima [at ground zero], somehow reenters earths atmosphere unscathed, free falls at around 203kph for over an hour to only land comfortably in some rubble [most conveniently in London], only to brush off the effects of hypoxia and hypothermia so (s)he can take a deep breath.
-or-
2) Said individual never left earth in the first place because they entered into a hallucinatory state due to the final straw of overwhelming mental stress and decay and physical trauma after beging caught in the blast radius of a death-beam.
Links:
http://social.biowar...3/2140#11951474
http://social.biowar...832/50#12081707
After seeing Indiana Jones 4, I'm not so sure
@OP: while Shepard having "London wound" is my favorite part of proving all the scene unreal, I assume it can be just a coincidence. Would like it not to be one though.
Samtheman63 wrote...
heres some picks after the beam and after marauder shields attacks, there is no injury to shepards stomach area and he clearly isn't touching his side
darkchief10 wrote...
does no one remember marauder shields shot you there before you killed him? seriously?
Actually that's called deliberation. In the UE3 there's a command that forces those weapons to be used during a cinematic. The reason they do it is because some people might only play through with a shotgun or SMG equipped, so the UE3 has a command to force an Avenger or a Predator because it would look pretty stupid if Shepard was to use a shotgun to aim at long distance targets or a sniper rifle on someone standing next to him.Tre.will wrote...
Samtheman63 wrote...
heres some picks after the beam and after marauder shields attacks, there is no injury to shepards stomach area and he clearly isn't touching his side
It's called inconsistency.
My Shepard is using The Revenant, then all of a sudden, in a cut-scene, he's holding an Avenger. Inconsistency.
Case and point.
Modifié par Salient Archer, 23 mai 2012 - 03:17 .
Salient Archer wrote...
Actually that's called deliberation. In the UE3 there's a command that forces those weapons to be used during a cinematic. The reason they do it is because some people might only play through with a shotgun or SMG equipped, so the UE3 has a command to force an Avenger or a Predator because it would look pretty stupid if Shepard was to use a shotgun to aim at long distance targets or a sniper rifle on someone standing next to him.Tre.will wrote...
Samtheman63 wrote...
heres some picks after the beam and after marauder shields attacks, there is no injury to shepards stomach area and he clearly isn't touching his side
It's called inconsistency.
My Shepard is using The Revenant, then all of a sudden, in a cut-scene, he's holding an Avenger. Inconsistency.
Case and point.
Another example of this piece of code being used, is when the developers forced a Carnifex when Shepard shoots Mordin at Tuchanka, the reason being that Mordin handed Shepard a Carnifex in ME2 as a sign of goodwill between the two and it played to that symbolism.
Tre.will wrote...
Bioware is one of my favorite game developers. But, you are giving them too much credit.
In the scene where you confront Miranda's father; Miranda's face is cut and bruised, but several shots in that entire sequence have her without any cuts and bruises. Oversight. Inconsistency. Call what you will. It is in thousands of games and will continue to be in thousands of games. There are alot of things that support IT, however, Shepard's side wound is not one of them.
Mr. Big Pimpin wrote...
Sure it can; I'm doing it right now.Shepard Wins wrote...
This little fragment cannot be dismissed as lazy design/writing on BioWare's part.
Modifié par OblivionDawn, 23 mai 2012 - 08:54 .
That theory says only that you are basing IT off speculations - 100% true.Destructorlio wrote...
ioannisdenton wrote...
The way i see it. Me3 is SO baddly written compared to the previous games that actually the fan-generated from speculations IT makes sense and bioware should use it ASAP.
That theory, whilst oft-postulated, assumes we are creating IT out of whole cloth. We're not. We are inferring it from in-game evidence. Hence: it was planned and intentional.
Tre.will wrote...
Salient Archer wrote...
Actually that's called deliberation. In the UE3 there's a command that forces those weapons to be used during a cinematic. The reason they do it is because some people might only play through with a shotgun or SMG equipped, so the UE3 has a command to force an Avenger or a Predator because it would look pretty stupid if Shepard was to use a shotgun to aim at long distance targets or a sniper rifle on someone standing next to him.Tre.will wrote...
Samtheman63 wrote...
heres some picks after the beam and after marauder shields attacks, there is no injury to shepards stomach area and he clearly isn't touching his side
*image snip*
It's called inconsistency.
My Shepard is using The Revenant, then all of a sudden, in a cut-scene, he's holding an Avenger. Inconsistency.
Case and point.
Another example of this piece of code being used, is when the developers forced a Carnifex when Shepard shoots Mordin at Tuchanka, the reason being that Mordin handed Shepard a Carnifex in ME2 as a sign of goodwill between the two and it played to that symbolism.
Bioware is one of my favorite game developers. But, you are giving them too much credit.
In the scene where you confront Miranda's father; Miranda's face is cut and bruised, but several shots in that entire sequence have her without any cuts and bruises. Oversight. Inconsistency. Call what you will. It is in thousands of games and will continue to be in thousands of games. There are alot of things that support IT, however, Shepard's side wound is not one of them.
I tend to agree ! but : Anderson leans to his right, as he was shot in right side, however If I recall correctly he holds his left hand to left sideBaa Baa wrote...
Yeah, but people have reason to believe it wasn't from that shot.darkchief10 wrote...
does no one remember marauder shields shot you there before you killed him? seriously?
1: Marauder Shields shot you in the right shoulder, not left side of your body.
2: He suddenly starts bleeding when Anderson dies, he doesn't bleed excessively before hand for some reason.
. I wonder if it was done on purpose to throw us off the track or just was badly done.Quality check was not this game's strongest point.
Joccaren wrote...
(...)
There is no empirical evidence for it, but there are speculations that support it. "inferring from in-game evidence" is speculation
(...)
Yes, but why leans to his right then ? Also Shepard seems to lean to his right after shooting Anderson. Bad writing or no quality check ?Bill Casey wrote...
HagarIshay wrote...
You do understand Shepard shot Anderson's right side, and Shepard is bleeding from the left side?
Anderson clutches his left abdomen when he gets shot...
why would you put pressure on the hurt side of your body?dr888 wrote...
Yes, but why leans to his right then ? Also Shepard seems to lean to his right after shooting Anderson. Bad writing or no quality check ?Bill Casey wrote...
HagarIshay wrote...
You do understand Shepard shot Anderson's right side, and Shepard is bleeding from the left side?
Anderson clutches his left abdomen when he gets shot...
Modifié par Shepard Wins, 23 mai 2012 - 02:26 .
Shepard clearly had the wound before he shot Anderson.Destructorlio wrote...
Not saying that IT is true, but assuming that it is for a moment, and the EC comes out and completely validates it as being true and the story continues on from Shepard's 'breath'. After that happens, there will be interviews with Bioware when they can FINALLY be candid and talk openly about their plan. And the interviewer will ask: "What clues did you put in that IT was true?" and they will say, well, obviously the breath, and the Normandy crash, and the trees at the conduit, and the reflections in the crucible room. And they will definitely say that when you shot Andersen, you got the wound. It was one of the first moments of 'unreality' where you first got an inkling that things weren't quite right. I mean, there is no question of this- if IT is true, that wound is a BIG sign that it is.
Modifié par jsadalia, 23 mai 2012 - 03:37 .
kingpenn wrote...
why would you put pressure on the hurt side of your body?dr888 wrote...
Yes, but why leans to his right then ? Also Shepard seems to lean to his right after shooting Anderson. Bad writing or no quality check ?Bill Casey wrote...
HagarIshay wrote...
You do understand Shepard shot Anderson's right side, and Shepard is bleeding from the left side?
Anderson clutches his left abdomen when he gets shot...
Modifié par bFootball, 23 mai 2012 - 04:06 .
lol let me refraise why would lu lean on the injury i dont mean the hand imrefurint to the lean if you eant to move you lean to the side that does not hurt not the side that does in my opinian putting pressure would stop the bleeding you are fight i need to choose words betterBob3terd wrote...
kingpenn wrote...
why would you put pressure on the hurt side of your body?dr888 wrote...
Yes, but why leans to his right then ? Also Shepard seems to lean to his right after shooting Anderson. Bad writing or no quality check ?Bill Casey wrote...
HagarIshay wrote...
You do understand Shepard shot Anderson's right side, and Shepard is bleeding from the left side?
Anderson clutches his left abdomen when he gets shot...
Seriously youd just let it bleed? The reason people put pressure on a wound is to staunch the bleeding, if you dont you bleed out.
Retour en haut
