Why did Gandalf not use a fireball? He knew his strength......
#1
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 05:46
The only time a mage in dragon age should show their power is when fighting a demon or dragon so powerful that they have no choice but to push the limits of their magic to the max.
With that said....
Mages are powerful but should know when to use their power.
A mage killing a hurlock is sooooo tacky.....
Shame on all of you..
#2
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 05:49
If you were a powerful mage, would you prefer to obliterate your enemies from a long range with a fireball or fight like a chump with a sword and a staff? Why exactly should you "hold back" for weaker enemies other than as a part of badly written plot?
Gandalf was a badly written mage, who talked too much.
#3
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:01
#4
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:02
LotR was a Low Magic - High Fantasy.
#5
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:04
#6
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:07
As for big beasties I would recommend entire team going ranged for then hiding behind pillars and such avoiding to be dragged in, it works perfectly that way.
#7
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:08
Levitate
Light
Knock
Telekineses
According to AD&D Dungeon Master's Guide, he is only a Level 2 Magic User.
In other words: Gandalf is Revenant food.
#8
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:09
Jensonagain wrote...
And the overpowered mages in Dragon age should follow in Gandalfs footsteps.
We, unlike him, are not immortal. Nor are we bound to silly codes of conduct, though the Aequitarians and Loyalists would like to change that. If a spawn comes charging at me, hellbent on slipping his blade between my ribs, I'm not holding back just because I *might* be invoking overkill.
And if some innocent schmuck gets caught in the crossfire, well collateral damage happens. Better he die to my fireball, than I fall because I held back in some moronic streetfight and the darkspawn horde gets him.
#9
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:10
Also it isn't like they "learned" magic, they were instead servants of the Vanir who had the greater tasks of serving Eru, Gandalf's name specifically means "wand and sword".
#10
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:11
Jensonagain wrote...
And the overpowered mages in Dragon age should follow in Gandalfs footsteps.
The only time a mage in dragon age should show their power is when fighting a demon or dragon so powerful that they have no choice but to push the limits of their magic to the max.
With that said....
Mages are powerful but should know when to use their power.
A mage killing a hurlock is sooooo tacky.....
Shame on all of you..
I am not sure why, but I laughed at that man. Like outloud and evevrything.
#11
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:21
Jensonagain wrote...
And the overpowered mages in Dragon age should follow in Gandalfs footsteps.
The only time a mage in dragon age should show their power is when fighting a demon or dragon so powerful that they have no choice but to push the limits of their magic to the max.
With that said....
Mages are powerful but should know when to use their power.
A mage killing a hurlock is sooooo tacky.....
Shame on all of you..
Yes...let me do nothing, see how far you get. Don't ask for heals either, know your own strength like Gandalf...
#12
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:32
Sauron knew Gandalf was with the ring bearer, and Gandalf knew that any powerful spell would reveal his presence to the "Eye"...
Just my 2 cents...
#13
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 06:33
#14
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 07:02
#15
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 07:04
#16
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 07:23
#17
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 08:24
#18
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 08:33
#19
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 08:59
#20
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 09:01
#21
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 09:01
Jsmith0730 wrote...
You know... looking at that pic... has there EVER been a game where a magic class could wield a staff & sword? There needs to be one, IMO.
This one.
Ultima
Wizardry
Might and Magic to name a few.
#22
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 09:14
deathwing200 wrote...
Think about this:
If you were a powerful mage, would you prefer to obliterate your enemies from a long range with a fireball or fight like a chump with a sword and a staff? Why exactly should you "hold back" for weaker enemies other than as a part of badly written plot?
Gandalf was a badly written mage, who talked too much.
Sorry but this was too stupid to read and not comment on it.
Gandalf a badly written mage? Seriously either you haven't read Tolkien or you are just ignorant.
In tolkiens universe mages would cast a spell only when it was important, they weren't show offs throwing fireballs around places. Magic was considered a serious force and not to play with.
As for the OP i agree to some extent. Ofc in a game you can't have a mage not throwing spells. Would be a waste to have one if you would not cast.
Edit: As two people above said about Gandalf not using his powers cause of fear he would found, that is correct.
Modifié par Bonkz, 10 décembre 2009 - 09:17 .
#23
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 09:14
Gandalf was (pretty much) immortal and a decent fighter. Maybe you can play Gandalf as an Arcane Warrior.
#24
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 09:29
Lughsan35 wrote...
Jsmith0730 wrote...
You know... looking at that pic... has there EVER been a game where a magic class could wield a staff & sword? There needs to be one, IMO.
This one.
Ultima
Wizardry
Might and Magic to name a few.
I think he means simultaneously.
Incidentally, if there was some sort of limiting system to be put into place, I'd suggest it be based off of powerful spells causing demons to be more closely drawn to you.
#25
Posté 10 décembre 2009 - 09:29




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






