Raise your hand if you ever got the ban hammer?
#26
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 02:37
Chicken with BBQ sauce and raw horsemeat.
#27
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 02:43
Not even a threat before like he should have done.
Since this day, I think Epler is a bad moderator and he lost all my respect.
I' am on this forum for a few years now, and I've seen much worse than " if you think this, then you are an idiot ", without any ban. lol. And he is not at all impartial.
I don't even know how many people on this forum have said to someone, you are stupid in a debate. Just.... No.
Modifié par Sylvianus, 24 mai 2012 - 02:44 .
#28
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 02:48
Sorry, but that kind of logic simply doesn't fly with us.
#29
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 02:51
#30
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 02:55
#31
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 02:57
I'm not idiot, Stan. I watch before talking. I watch where moderators are involved in discussions and I saw in these discussions many things much worse and they don't do anything or they just threat or lock topics without any ban.Ninja Stan wrote...
Other people not being caught and/or punished means you didn't do anything wrong. It's so obvious.
Sorry, but that kind of logic simply doesn't fly with us.
And I 'm not saying I didn't do anything wrong, thank you, I 'm saying it didn't deserve a ban for three days without any threat before in a hot discussion where people on this forum were also insulted even if it wasn't with rude words.
Modifié par Sylvianus, 24 mai 2012 - 03:04 .
#32
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:04
Many of the complaints similar to yours that I hear, I usually attribute to subjectivity. Because you feel other people are getting away with something while you are being punished for it.Sylvianus wrote...
I'm not idiot, Stan. I watch before talking. I watch where moderators are involved in discussions and I saw in these discussions many things much worse and they don't do anything or they just threat or lock topics without any ban.Ninja Stan wrote...
Other people not being caught and/or punished means you didn't do anything wrong. It's so obvious.
Sorry, but that kind of logic simply doesn't fly with us.
I'm not saying that we Moderators will always catch every rules violation in our forums, but we do deal with a lot of troublemakers and rules violators complaining that "others are getting away with it," as if that somehow excuses them from breaking the rules themselves.
#33
Guest_Logan Cloud_*
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:07
Guest_Logan Cloud_*
Ninja Stan wrote...
Other people not being caught and/or punished means you didn't do anything wrong. It's so obvious.
Sorry, but that kind of logic simply doesn't fly with us.
But the moderators (even you) are human beings, and sometimes they're having a crappy day, and ban someone for pretty stupid reasons because they have the option to abuse power when they're not happy.
I've not been banned. Many of my friends have been. Most of the time they've done nothing wrong.
A moderator is just like a police officer that writes a speeding ticket. Legally, you can write that ticket if they're going 1mph over the speed limit, but it's still a pretty crap-tastic thing to do.
No offense of course.
#34
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:17
I can accept this, but disagree that we "abuse power." We have only had one or two Moderators in the history of our online community that have actually "abused their power," and in both cases, the Moderator has been relieved of duty. In these cases, it's best to discuss things with the Moderator in question. We are very approachable. If the Moderator cannot be dealt with, you should message Chris Priestly, the forum's Community Coordinator.Logan Cloud wrote...
Ninja Stan wrote...
Other people not being caught and/or punished means you didn't do anything wrong. It's so obvious.
Sorry, but that kind of logic simply doesn't fly with us.
But the moderators (even you) are human beings, and sometimes they're having a crappy day, and ban someone for pretty stupid reasons because they have the option to abuse power when they're not happy.
It's hard to not take offense when you're accusing us of abusing our power. In your example, the law is still being broken and the officer is well within his rights to write you a ticket for going even 1 mph over the speed limit. Just because you disagree with the enforcement of that law does not make it okay to break that law, nor does it make the officer wrong. Instead, the fact that most officers will let speeders slide if they go 4, 5, or even 10 mph over the limit should be praised, but you'll never hear drivers say nice things about being allowed to speed because they feel entitled to do so.I've not been banned. Many of my friends have been. Most of the time they've done nothing wrong.
A moderator is just like a police officer that writes a speeding ticket. Legally, you can write that ticket if they're going 1mph over the speed limit, but it's still a pretty crap-tastic thing to do.
No offense of course.
In my opinion, it's a "pretty crap-tastic thing to do" to expect officers to excuse your breaking of the law just because you disagree with it. Man, I feel like I used two whole paragraphs to say the exact same thing 4 or 5 times.
#35
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:23
I have gotten an infraction here or there but hey no ones perfect and we all make stupid mistakes now and then.
Modifié par Hyperglide, 24 mai 2012 - 03:24 .
#36
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:28
I thought I was fighting for people who wanted a more inviting environment in which to participate. I was wrong.
#37
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:28
I just believe in appropriate punishment, and not things that seem to take enormous proportions.Ninja Stan wrote...
Many of the complaints similar to yours that I hear, I usually attribute to subjectivity. Because you feel other people are getting away with something while you are being punished for it.Sylvianus wrote...
I'm not idiot, Stan. I watch before talking. I watch where moderators are involved in discussions and I saw in these discussions many things much worse and they don't do anything or they just threat or lock topics without any ban.Ninja Stan wrote...
Other people not being caught and/or punished means you didn't do anything wrong. It's so obvious.
Sorry, but that kind of logic simply doesn't fly with us.
I'm not saying that we Moderators will always catch every rules violation in our forums, but we do deal with a lot of troublemakers and rules violators complaining that "others are getting away with it," as if that somehow excuses them from breaking the rules themselves.
you know how this forum can be rude and insulting, that was the case for me. " if you think this, then you're stupid. " Does it really deserve a ban for three days ? I don't think so. There are many people who tell to other folks how they are idiots without using this word. We should ban them too in this case.
I know it was wrong but I am a human being like you when yourself as a moderator you could have some rude words for other people on this forum ( and i don't mean those vulgar ). I think it should have been just a warning and i would have immediately understood. I'm no child. I'm just saying that. I see everyday people using words with **** and they don't have any ban. Almost all the time on this forum I try to be civil, and to be banned for that, yes I was disguted. That was and that is just my feelings.
A ban is a serious matter, at least for me, and it should be used when using vulgar words or breaking the rules essential as homophobia or racism or I don't know for me. There are many many many people in a debate that can say sometimes to others you are an idiot, or you are stupid. I mean, it isn't that terrible. Just ask them to stop and they'll stop. I felt it was more the option to abuse power infortunately and I wonder if it isn't because of the new rules.
Modifié par Sylvianus, 24 mai 2012 - 03:35 .
#38
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:29
If it ever happens in the future, it's because of my good looks.
#39
Guest_Logan Cloud_*
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:31
Guest_Logan Cloud_*
As I've said, I've not been banned. I've not recieved any tickets while driving either. I don't gain anything from disagreeing with an officer who writes a ticket for going 1mph over, but I probably will anyway if it happens to someone.
I don't gain anything from saying what a moderator does is unnecessary either. But as a by-stander with nothing to gain either way, I'll throw my support where I think it belongs, and often times, the people who are banned have done nothing wrong.
Other people have also complained about the severity of their punishments. One person will be perma-banned for something, and someone else will do the same thing and get a warning. That's certainly not fair, and I have seen it happen. I'm sure it's not your intention as moderators to be unfair, but you still do it.
This is an opinion however, so if you or another moderator feels that someone needs to be banned, it's in your power to do so. I may not agree, but I can't do much about it.
#40
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:32
#41
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:34
Without seeing these situations first-hand, all I have is your say-so that our reactions to your post was unjust. Sorry.Sylvianus wrote...
I just believe in appropriate punishment, and not things that seem to take enormous proportions.
you know how this forum can be rude and insulting, that was the case for me. " if you think this, then you're stupid. " Does it really deserves a ban for three days ? I don't think so. There are many people who tell to other how they are idiots without using this word. We should ban them too in this case.
And sharing your opinions is cool. But please note that as Moderators, we cannot allow the rules violators and punishments decide their own punishment. We Mods have to use our best judgement at the time based on the subject at hand. If you disagree, you are always free to tell us so.I know it was wrong but I am a human being like you when yourself as a moderator you could have some rude words for other people on this forum ( and i don't mean those vulgar ). I think it should have been just a warning and i would have immediately understood. I'm no child. I'm just saying that. I see everyday people using words with **** and they don't have any ban. almost all the time on this forum I 'm trying to be civil, and to be banned for that, yes I was disguted. That was and that is just my feelings.
Agreed.A ban is a serious matter, at least for me, and it should be used when using vulgar words or breaks the rules essential as homophobia or racism or I don't know for me. There are many many many people in a debate that can say sometimes to others you are an idiot, or you are stupid. I mean, it isn't that terrible. Just ask them to stop and they'll stop.
#42
Guest_Son Ov Mars_*
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:35
Guest_Son Ov Mars_*
#43
Guest_greengoron89_*
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:35
Guest_greengoron89_*
Pacifien wrote...
I had access to the ban hammer once. I was strict, and I advocated harder punishments to those I noticed were repeatedly being banned. However, I didn't read every single post made on every single forum in which I moderated, plus, as I am not a robot, subjectivity was going to be an ever-present accusation. And I still think many people thought I got paid to do the job, which is... no. No. Just no. Not even. No.
I thought I was fighting for people who wanted a more inviting environment in which to participate. I was wrong.
Oh wow, I didn't even realize you weren't a mod anymore until I looked in the mod lists on the forum home just now. O_o
#44
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:35
Second was for resurrectin a bunch of 6 month or older threads.
Third was because someone else started ressurectin threads, and Priestly banned me while I was banned for some reason.
Fourth was for trollin the Indoctrination Thread. I got it closed, it was Legendary.
I'll probably get a fifth and final one soon, I've got somethin big planned. Definetely permaban worthy.
#45
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:35
You're too pretty to be banned, bmwcrazy, but that won't stop me from trying.bmwcrazy wrote...
I've never gotten banned.
If it ever happens in the future, it's because of my good looks.
#46
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:36
Modifié par Marixus99.9, 24 mai 2012 - 03:37 .
#47
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:36
#48
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:38
ErichHartmann wrote...
I'm a paragon of virtue. It's impossible for me to get banned.
Writing this down for future reference.
#49
Guest_Son Ov Mars_*
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:39
Guest_Son Ov Mars_*
HiddenKING wrote...
Fourth was for trollin the Indoctrination Thread. I got it closed, it was Legendary.
.
Indeed. And it was glorious!!
#50
Posté 24 mai 2012 - 03:39
Most of the time, they *have* done something wrong, they just never bothered to read the site rules. Or their interpretation is different from the moderator that banned them. Or they think they only crossed the line a little bit, everyone else was doing it, so why did they get the ban?Logan Cloud wrote...
Most of the time they've done nothing wrong.
I had many debates over the use of the term "idiot" or "stupid" during an argument. I understand another person feeling such terminology is completely appropriate. I've had debates over people having a bit of fun during a "in before the lock" thread. I understand that as well. I just disagreed with them, and as a moderator, I had the authority to ban them for a day.
Of course, because there's a disagreement, the other person is going to feel that 1) they did nothing wrong and




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







