Fanfic Writers’ Support Group
#2676
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 04:12
#2677
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 04:14
#2678
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 04:35
Drussius wrote...
My chosen method of encouragement is mock outrage and overly-dramatic threats. Of course, writer's block is something that has to be waited out or worked through at your own pace. And writing is done best when it's done when you're in a writing mood. I will patiently wait for more Shepard and Liara.
But I may still threaten to employ pointy objects and possibly biotic henchmen. It's my way of letting my fellow writers know that they have my support.
I'm an odd one that way.
And I suppose I could get behind a revolt wielding waffle cones and ice cream. And after I put in all the effort to sharpen my pitchfork. Darn it!
I'll pitch in with playful jabs and occasional witty non-sequiteurs <<insert something droll here>>. But yeah, if you see threats of mob uprisings, that's us being supportive ;P
#2679
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 06:15
I was bored of the synthesis ending debate so instead of explaining why I don't like it in points, I wrote a story about it.
But I kinda went too wild with the story and it ended up being much much longer than I meant it to be and I'm kinda proud of it in a weird way. Can I post it on this board?
#2680
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 06:21
MetioricTest wrote...
Wait am I allowed to post fanfiction on this board?
I was bored of the synthesis ending debate so instead of explaining why I don't like it in points, I wrote a story about it.
But I kinda went too wild with the story and it ended up being much much longer than I meant it to be and I'm kinda proud of it in a weird way. Can I post it on this board?
I'm not the moderator, so I can't say, but I imagine if all of us started posting our fics, it'd get full quick, and be confusing.
How about a link to a DA or ff.net account? Those are easy enough to create, and I'm sure some of us would be more than happy to give it a glance (at least me, for one, once I finish fleshing ideas out for my own fic,
#2681
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 06:25
Seracen wrote...
MetioricTest wrote...
Wait am I allowed to post fanfiction on this board?
I was bored of the synthesis ending debate so instead of explaining why I don't like it in points, I wrote a story about it.
But I kinda went too wild with the story and it ended up being much much longer than I meant it to be and I'm kinda proud of it in a weird way. Can I post it on this board?
I'm not the moderator, so I can't say, but I imagine if all of us started posting our fics, it'd get full quick, and be confusing.
How about a link to a DA or ff.net account? Those are easy enough to create, and I'm sure some of us would be more than happy to give it a glance (at least me, for one, once I finish fleshing ideas out for my own fic,)
This would be the best course of action. Post it on DA or FFnet and link to it in your sig, or in a post (sig preferably, more efficient).
I mean, we love fanfiction here, but posting the whole thing in a help/support thread probably would just be confusing. Unless you have a paragraph or so that you're wanting critique on, or whatnot.
#2682
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 06:35
does DA do fanfics?
#2683
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 06:48
DA does written submissions, but it's a big hassle. They don't have a good foundation for chapters, making it annoying to provide links to the next submission sometimes.MetioricTest wrote...
Tried FF.net. Won't let me upload for 2 days...
does DA do fanfics?
FFnet has a 2 day waiting period, yes, but it's easier to upload and update your work there, and it's a busier place, and has a good, effective search function.
I mean, I will admit I have a bias against DA for written stuff primarily because their written submission system blows...and most people looking up ass effect related stuff are looking for artwork and skip over the written submissions. That's just what I observe, though. Others may feel differently.
#2684
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 07:06
fluffywalrus wrote...
DA does written submissions, but it's a big hassle. They don't have a good foundation for chapters, making it annoying to provide links to the next submission sometimes.MetioricTest wrote...
Tried FF.net. Won't let me upload for 2 days...
does DA do fanfics?
FFnet has a 2 day waiting period, yes, but it's easier to upload and update your work there, and it's a busier place, and has a good, effective search function.
I mean, I will admit I have a bias against DA for written stuff primarily because their written submission system blows...and most people looking up ass effect related stuff are looking for artwork and skip over the written submissions. That's just what I observe, though. Others may feel differently.
Cool! Thanks for the information. Finally managed to get it up on DA: Hassle was right lol.
http://fav.me/d576c4t
Give me some slack because it's the first and quite possibly last thing I ever came up with and I literally wrote it as I went like a rant. So sorry if it's too long.
But hopefully you will enjoy
I wrote too much for no human to avoid not suffering through it!
#2685
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 08:51
DA’s problem is that it has no concept of chapters, so authors need to add links themselves. Most don’t, which makes multipart things hard to read.
…
On topic of sites, I noticed that FFN has added some more info in the Publish > Manage Stories view; it shows follower and review counts, and even some kind of a total view count. It shows almost a third more than my numbers, though, so I have no idea how reliable one should consider it — but it’s definitely Visitors-based rather than Hits (were it the latter, it’d be something like 3-4 times the number I have).
#2686
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 09:27
If so, where do you think someone like Miranda would have hers 'concealed'? (Not meant to sound rude!)
I'm thinking of including a bit in the Kai Leng encounter where he manages to disable it up close.
Modifié par hot_heart, 13 juillet 2012 - 09:28 .
#2687
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 10:00
I’ve gone with the base assumption that the field generated must be attuned or molded so that it autonomously envelops the bearer — the alternative to that would have to be some type of a distribution system built into the armor that had conduits that allowed the field to be kind of pushed out of individual parts (think water pushed into a bag with lots of tiny holes).
It’d be attractive to think that it’s solely a box that projects a human-shaped shield, which would enable anyone to wear one, in any kind of clothing, but — while I’ve left it unexplained — I think a more reasonable compromise is some type of grid built into armor, clothing, or the undersuit. This grid, by some means, ‘attracts’ or guides the field progression, causing it to wrap around the user rather than project out. A further refinement could be that without the grid, a shield generator can only project a flat or slightly curved surface, like an actual shield rather than a suit of armor. Technically — or nontechnically, as the case may be — the need for the grid could be obviated by handwaving that the body’s magnetic field (or whatever) acts as the affinity, but that seems a little sillier than usual.
So, er.
Proper armor would have a generator and a builtin grid, perhaps with amplifiers, enabling the most comprehensive and robust covering.
A complete shield could also be achieved by wearing a detachable generator box or belt, and (more sparsely) gridded clothing or undergarments, or possibly even by something like little bracelets around various body parts, or by implanted anchor points.
A non-gridded shield would only be able to project a more or less static field a little further from the body, and it might be difficult to achieve even 75% directional protection.
An external shield generator could be seen as either directly projecting onto nearby grids (which makes logical sense, if not necessarily technological), or then just supplying energy to be channeled through the user’s generator.
So…
I’d say Miranda will have a reasonably high-tech skinsuit (hopefully under some clothing, but you could even use the honeycomb pattern the white suit shows…) with a builtin grid. I think you can put the generator anywhere — small of the back, for example, or between the shoulders — but for realism, you might want to stipulate that it’s in a special compartment that has built-in heat dissipation and some armoring around it.
…
(Also, grammatical suggestions are always welcome
Modifié par lillitheris, 13 juillet 2012 - 10:08 .
#2688
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 10:15
I am at work but it's quiet so I shall try and find the odd bit here and there that scanned oddly with me (not necessarily wrong) and add them here.
Cheers again for the help!
EDIT:
Ch 1.
Only the absence of return fire and the woman's warning to not move quelled the desire.
Really fussy, I know but 'not to move' avoids the split infinitive.
they had still been losing 3 ships for every Reaper craft.
Not sure about stylistic standards but I tend to favour the written form of numbers over the numeric in these instances
Hackett had been forced to change strategy to harrying the enemy and drawing the Reapers away from the Crucible rather than even trying to destroy them.
Something just looks odd about calling Reapers 'the enemy' and then referring to them as Reapers right after. Might just be a case of switching that 'and' for a comma, or 'Hackett had been forced to change strategy to harrying the Reapers, drawing them away from the Crucible rather than (even) trying to destroy them.
The heat of the thermal had resealed the wound reasonably well, and his only remaining medi-gel pouch and hacking the reserves in his suit to flood his system had been enough to dull the pain and start replacing the lost blood.
This sentence reads a little awkwardly. Without major revision, I would switch that 'and' after the comma for a 'while'.
She was silent for a moment to make sure he got to a good rhythm, and then continued, her breathing audibly strained from supporting Mkawa's bulk. "I only found you by pure luck. I followed this keeper to the
corridor you were in and I probably would have thought you one of these poor souls,"
Some of this dialogue seems to be repeating what she's already said (finding him by accident, following keepers) and it's pure exposition. I would start from the "I probably would have..." bit . And you closed the speech marks at the end of the first paragraph here when I think it's supposed to run-on?
Modifié par hot_heart, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:22 .
#2689
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:06
…
And, yes, I’d say there’s definitely some kind of a device that generates the shield and as such it can be disabled.
#2690
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:19
Moderately successful, he looked the remnants of his leg over for bleeding.
Really persnickety again, but I would put it as 'looked over'.
"Let's see if I can cut down the distance any for you if you do come back,"
Personal preference really, but I would put a comma before that second 'if'.
Overall, though, I'm liking it. Some of the dialogue feels a bit dry and a tad too focused on exposition but I suppose that's understandable given the circumstances and characters during this chapter. Will have to read more later when I can give it my full attention.
Modifié par hot_heart, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:20 .
#2691
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:46
hot_heart wrote...
Continuing...
Moderately successful, he looked the remnants of his leg over for bleeding.
Really persnickety again, but I would put it as 'looked over'.
"Let's see if I can cut down the distance any for you if you do come back,"
Personal preference really, but I would put a comma before that second 'if'.
These two I slightly disagree with…the former I might yet change, but in the case of the second, I think I prefer the cadence of it without the comma. With the comma added, it feels like it overemphasizes the if aspect, if you see what I’m saying?
But this is wonderfully helpful, a big thank you for taking the time! I already got the fixes in :happy:
Overall, though, I'm liking it. Some of the dialogue feels a bit dry and a tad too focused on exposition but I suppose that's understandable given the circumstances and characters during this chapter. Will have to read more later when I can give it my full attention.
I’m glad to hear that! The first chapter is definitely the worst on exposition…I’ve been thinking about ways to avoid it, but the setup required would probably need a heavy restructuring of the events, and I just don’t have the time to do that
The dryness is one of the things I’m sometimes worried about. As I said a bit earlier, I try to consciously avoid the badassery and quippiness…even though that seems to come naturally to me. So I try to make sure things are mostly more understated, but I probably overcorrect in some cases. Then, on the other hand, when I do go for badassery upon occasion, I wonder if it doesn’t stand out too much…
Writing’s hard, let’s go shopping!
Modifié par lillitheris, 13 juillet 2012 - 11:47 .
#2692
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:53
I ask because I've had a few readers request... intimacy scenes, lol. The scene(s) is in capable hands, so I'm not worried in that regard.
#2693
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:54
lillitheris wrote...
^ Good, thanks! Think I agree with each. I sometimes struggle with the numbers…the general rule is that <10 (or even <20) should always be written out, but sometimes it seems like it would be better as a number to indicate precision. In this case, it does pop out a little even visually, so mayhaps it’s better written…
I think the general rule is that single digits are spelt out, double+ are numerical.
#2694
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:56
lillitheris wrote...
I’m glad to hear that! The first chapter is definitely the worst on exposition…I’ve been thinking about ways to avoid it, but the setup required would probably need a heavy restructuring of the events, and I just don’t have the time to do thatSo long as it’s not too bad…
The dryness is one of the things I’m sometimes worried about. As I said a bit earlier, I try to consciously avoid the badassery and quippiness…even though that seems to come naturally to me. So I try to make sure things are mostly more understated, but I probably overcorrect in some cases. Then, on the other hand, when I do go for badassery upon occasion, I wonder if it doesn’t stand out too much…
Writing’s hard, let’s go shopping!
I'm not sure what's so bad about exposition. It is definitely possible to get carried away with it, but if it's sparse enough that it helps to set an image in the mind properly, I'm not sure I see the downside. This may have something to do with my tendency to include exposition frequently, but still, details belong in narrative stories.
As to the second point, there is nothing wrong with either quippiness or badassery, imo, as long as they are done in moderation. Especially when your work is based around a game trilogy featuring the most ultimate squad of badasses ever! (I may be overstating things slightly, but given the record of Shepard and her team, how can you not consider them to be badass?)
#2695
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:58
Oh, I know what you mean. I'm not sure if there is a grammatical rule about separate clauses like that but I just go with what feels right, as I'm sure you do. Everyone has their own approach. In this instance, I just had to reread the line, and figured the italicised 'do' already emphasied the inflection in the dialogue, while the comma gave an appropriate pause before that.lillitheris wrote...
in the case of the second, I think I prefer the cadence of it without the comma. With the comma added, it feels like it overemphasizes the if aspect, if you see what I’m saying?
Regarding the dialogue in general terms, I wouldn't take this chapter as being an overall representation, plus it's not a major thing. After all, these are effectively military personnel engaged in battle, so aren't going to be chatting it up unnecessarily. The main standout would be Kasumi. Though I can't vouch for knowing the character that well, I would've thought she'd be trying to reassure Mkawa more than explaining how she got there and how lucky he is.
Modifié par hot_heart, 13 juillet 2012 - 12:00 .
#2696
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 11:59
noxiuniversitas1 wrote...
lillitheris wrote...
^ Good, thanks! Think I agree with each. I sometimes struggle with the numbers…the general rule is that <10 (or even <20) should always be written out, but sometimes it seems like it would be better as a number to indicate precision. In this case, it does pop out a little even visually, so mayhaps it’s better written…
I think the general rule is that single digits are spelt out, double+ are numerical.
Is this the rule? I tend to spell out anything that's not a massive and complicated number.
"I saw forty-two of them."
"I'll pay you a thousand credits not to do that."
"I think she's about a hundred and fifty years old!"
"There are 87,942,437,652 distinct geth programs in this server."
This seems to work well for me.
#2697
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 12:05
Yeah, same for me.Drussius wrote...
Is this the rule? I tend to spell out anything that's not a massive and complicated number.
This seems to work well for me.
Oh, no, I agree. We're talking about too much exposition in the dialogue. Sometimes it just sits at odds with what the character might be saying. Where they're sort of narrating from outside, explaining events rather than speaking in the moment.Drussius wrote...
I'm not sure what's so bad about exposition. It is definitely possible to get carried away with it, but if it's
sparse enough that it helps to set an image in the mind properly, I'm not sure I see the downside. This may have something to do with my tendency to include exposition frequently, but still, details belong in narrative stories.
Modifié par hot_heart, 13 juillet 2012 - 12:09 .
#2698
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 12:09
tbh I think as long as you don't write numerals for the single digits, and you don't go OTT with the longer numbers, it's fine. But it does appear as if numbers <10 are spelt, everything else is digits.
#2699
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 12:10
The best part is that when someone reads it, they will inevitably point out at least a dozen gramatical errors even after I've combed through the chapter eleven times...
#2700
Posté 13 juillet 2012 - 12:12
hot_heart wrote...
Oh, no, I agree. We're talking about too much exposition in the dialogue. Sometimes it just sits at odds with what the character might be saying. Where they're sort of narrating from outside, explaining events rather than speaking in the moment.Drussius wrote...
I'm not sure what's so bad about exposition. It is definitely possible to get carried away with it, but if it's
sparse enough that it helps to set an image in the mind properly, I'm not sure I see the downside. This may have something to do with my tendency to include exposition frequently, but still, details belong in narrative stories.
Ah. I missed the point of the discussion. I'd have to agree then that it could feel a little out-of-place.





Retour en haut





