Drussius wrote...
First off, Happy New Year to all. Hope everyone had a great night and is enjoying the start to their 2013.Gisle-Aune wrote...
Samara: "Only three Ardat-Yakshi are in existance today..."
Codex: "Up to 1% of the asari population dwells on the Ardat-Yakshi spectrum."
Don't have a lot to add on the other issues discussed because I happen to agree with most of it. As for this, however, my personal feeling was that these were never meant to contradict each other. I took it instead as similar to genetic diseases like Taysachs. 1% of the asari population carries the recessive gene that contributes to the Ardat-Yakshi mutation, but like Taysachs, the mutation only actually occurs in children when both parents carry the gene. Hence the information given that it's a mutation that results only from asari-exclusive pairings. That sort of thing.
I mean, Samara is not an Ardat-Yakshi, but all three of her children were. So she apparently carries some sort of recessive gene that she passed on to her offspring, but she herself is not sterile, so the mutation isn't active in her physical makeup.
However, if you want to point out inconsistencies, there's something else in play with Samara. She says there are only three Ardat-Yakshi in existence today. And yet there's a whole Ardat-Yakshi monastery where her daughters are staying, and where logs make reference to multiple other Ardat-Yakshi.
The codex is a primary canon source, and it says "Contrary to popular belief, Ardat-Yakshi are neither extremely rare
(around one per cent of asari dwell on the AY spectrum), nor are they
all murderers." And that codex entry was around in ME2 too. And Aeian, the PTSD asari's dialogue says her friend Neaira is an Ardat-Yaskhi implicitly, but certainly, and serving among the elite forces (Commandos) at that.
Samara might have left out the sufferers of weaker variants when she told Shepard about it, since it is a great shame to her species and Shepard didn't really have to know there might be tens of millions of them.
Besides, if maybe a hundred million had the recessive gene, there would be more than three of them.
Modifié par Gisle-Aune, 01 janvier 2013 - 11:23 .





Retour en haut




